Literature DB >> 35150320

Race and Age Impact Osteoporosis Screening Rates in Women Prior to Hip Fracture.

Gregory Benes1, Justin David2, Molly Synowicz3, Alex Betech4, Vinod Dasa4, Peter C Krause4, Deryk Jones5, Lauren Hall6, Lauren Leslie5, Andrew G Chapple4,7.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density screening and clinical risk factors are important to stratify individuals for increased risk of fracture. In a population with no history of fractures or baseline bone density measurement, black women were less likely to be screened than white counterparts prior to hip fracture.
PURPOSE: To evaluate overall BMD (bone mineral density) screening rates within two years of hip fracture and to identify any disparities for osteoporosis screening or treatment in a female cohort who were eligible for screening under insurance and national recommendations.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 1,109 female patients listed in the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet) database, which consists of multiple health partner systems in Louisiana and Texas. Patients < 65 years old or with a history of hip fracture or osteoporosis diagnosis, screening or treatment more than 2 years before hip fracture were removed.
RESULTS: Only 223 (20.1%) females were screened within the two years prior to hip fracture. Additionally, only 23 (10%) of the screened patients received treatment, despite 187 (86.6%) patients being diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia. Screening rates reached a maximum of 27.9% in the 75-80 age group, while the 90 + age group had the lowest screening rates of 12%. We found a quadratic relationship between age and screening rates, indicating that the screening rate increases in age until age 72 and then decreases starkly. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that black patients had significantly decreased screening rates compared to white patients (adjusted OR = .454, 95% CI = .227-.908, p value = .026) which held in general and for patient ages 65-97.
CONCLUSION: Despite national recommendations, overall BMD screening rates among women prior to hip fracture are low. If individuals are not initially screened when eligible, they are less likely to ever be screened prior to fracture. Clinicians should address racial disparities by recommending more screening to otherwise healthy black patients above the age of 65. Lastly, treatment rates need to increase among those diagnosed with osteoporosis since all patients went on to hip fracture.
© 2022. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparities; Fracture prevention; Osteoporosis; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35150320     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01076-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  10 in total

1.  Health care disparities in postmenopausal women referred for DXA screening.

Authors:  Irene Hamrick; Kenneth K Steinweg; Doyle M Cummings; Lauren M Whetstone
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  FRAX Prediction With and Without Bone Mineral Density Testing.

Authors:  Rachel C Simpkins; Tara N Downs; Matthew T Lane
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2017-05

Review 3.  FRAX(®) with and without bone mineral density.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Eugene McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; William D Leslie
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010-2050.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Aijing Z Starr; James A Nunley
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 5.  Defining ethnic and racial differences in osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.

Authors:  Yasmin Bastos-Silva; Luiza Borges Aguiar; Aarão M Pinto-Neto; Luiz Francisco Baccaro; Lúcia Costa-Paiva
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  African Americans, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and osteoporosis: a paradox.

Authors:  John F Aloia
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Repeat bone mineral density screening and prediction of hip and major osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Elizabeth J Samelson; Michael J Pencina; Robert R McLean; L Adrienne Cupples; Kerry E Broe; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The Efficacy of Bisphosphonates for Prevention of Osteoporotic Fracture: An Update Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Byun; Sunmee Jang; Sumin Lee; Suyeon Park; Hyun Koo Yoon; Byung-Ho Yoon; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2017-02-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.