Boyang Zheng1, Mianbo Wang2, Wendy Stevens3, Susanna Proudman4, Mandana Nikpour3, Murray Baron5. 1. McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. 2. Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. 3. University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 4. University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. 5. McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: murray.baron.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is a multifaceted disease for which the Composite Response Index in dcSSc (CRISS) was developed as a global outcome measure. We aimed to further validate the CRISS by examining its association with other disease measures, patient reported quality of life (QoL), and mortality. METHODS: DcSSc patients with ≤5 year disease duration were recruited from multinational registries. CRISS improvers (score ≥0.6) and non-improvers (score <0.6) were identified after one year. Median changes in European Scleroderma Group Activity Index (EScSG-AI), Medsger Disease Severity Scale (DSS), Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Damage Index (SCTC-DI), and Short Form 36 physical component score (SF-36 PCS) after one year was compared between CRISS groups. Kaplan Meier and adjusted Cox analyses compared SCTC-DI damage accrual and mortality between CRISS groups. RESULTS: Of 212 patients, 68 (32.1%) were CRISS improvers. CRISS improvers had improved median EScSG-AI (-1.1 points [IQR -2.6, -0.3] vs. 0 [-1.1, 1.0], p<0.001), DSS (-1 [-3, 1] vs. 0 [-2, 2], p = 0.015), and SF-36 PCS (+3.6 [-1.0, 8.9] vs. -0.3 [-5.9, 4.5], p<0.001) compared to non-improvers. CRISS improvers were less likely to accumulate damage on the SCTC-DI (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.68 [0.47, 0.96]) adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, and immunosuppression use. CRISS improvers had a trend towards better survival. CONCLUSION: CRISS improvers had more favourable changes in measures of disease activity, disease severity, and QoL compared to non-improvers. These findings support the construct validity of a CRISS outcome after one year in early dcSSc.
OBJECTIVE: Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is a multifaceted disease for which the Composite Response Index in dcSSc (CRISS) was developed as a global outcome measure. We aimed to further validate the CRISS by examining its association with other disease measures, patient reported quality of life (QoL), and mortality. METHODS: DcSSc patients with ≤5 year disease duration were recruited from multinational registries. CRISS improvers (score ≥0.6) and non-improvers (score <0.6) were identified after one year. Median changes in European Scleroderma Group Activity Index (EScSG-AI), Medsger Disease Severity Scale (DSS), Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Damage Index (SCTC-DI), and Short Form 36 physical component score (SF-36 PCS) after one year was compared between CRISS groups. Kaplan Meier and adjusted Cox analyses compared SCTC-DI damage accrual and mortality between CRISS groups. RESULTS: Of 212 patients, 68 (32.1%) were CRISS improvers. CRISS improvers had improved median EScSG-AI (-1.1 points [IQR -2.6, -0.3] vs. 0 [-1.1, 1.0], p<0.001), DSS (-1 [-3, 1] vs. 0 [-2, 2], p = 0.015), and SF-36 PCS (+3.6 [-1.0, 8.9] vs. -0.3 [-5.9, 4.5], p<0.001) compared to non-improvers. CRISS improvers were less likely to accumulate damage on the SCTC-DI (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.68 [0.47, 0.96]) adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, and immunosuppression use. CRISS improvers had a trend towards better survival. CONCLUSION: CRISS improvers had more favourable changes in measures of disease activity, disease severity, and QoL compared to non-improvers. These findings support the construct validity of a CRISS outcome after one year in early dcSSc.