Literature DB >> 35148893

Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide.

Ross N Cuthbert1, Christophe Diagne2, Emma J Hudgins3, Anna Turbelin2, Danish A Ahmed4, Céline Albert2, Thomas W Bodey5, Elizabeta Briski6, Franz Essl7, Phillip J Haubrock8, Rodolphe E Gozlan9, Natalia Kirichenko10, Melina Kourantidou11, Andrew M Kramer12, Franck Courchamp13.   

Abstract

The global increase in biological invasions is placing growing pressure on the management of ecological and economic systems. However, the effectiveness of current management expenditure is difficult to assess due to a lack of standardised measurement across spatial, taxonomic and temporal scales. Furthermore, there is no quantification of the spending difference between pre-invasion (e.g. prevention) and post-invasion (e.g. control) stages, although preventative measures are considered to be the most cost-effective. Here, we use a comprehensive database of invasive alien species economic costs (InvaCost) to synthesise and model the global management costs of biological invasions, in order to provide a better understanding of the stage at which these expenditures occur. Since 1960, reported management expenditures have totalled at least US$95.3 billion (in 2017 values), considering only highly reliable and actually observed costs - 12-times less than damage costs from invasions ($1130.6 billion). Pre-invasion management spending ($2.8 billion) was over 25-times lower than post-invasion expenditure ($72.7 billion). Management costs were heavily geographically skewed towards North America (54%) and Oceania (30%). The largest shares of expenditures were directed towards invasive alien invertebrates in terrestrial environments. Spending on invasive alien species management has grown by two orders of magnitude since 1960, reaching an estimated $4.2 billion per year globally (in 2017 values) in the 2010s, but remains 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than damages. National management spending increased with incurred damage costs, with management actions delayed on average by 11 years globally following damage reporting. These management delays on the global level have caused an additional invasion cost of approximately $1.2 trillion, compared to scenarios with immediate management. Our results indicate insufficient management - particularly pre-invasion - and urge better investment to prevent future invasions and to control established alien species. Recommendations to improve reported management cost comprehensiveness, resolution and terminology are also made.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosecurity; Delayed control and eradication; Global trends; InvaCost; Invasive alien species; Socio-economic impacts

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35148893     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Global economic costs of herpetofauna invasions.

Authors:  Ismael Soto; Ross N Cuthbert; Antonín Kouba; César Capinha; Anna Turbelin; Emma J Hudgins; Christophe Diagne; Franck Courchamp; Phillip J Haubrock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  The Bugs in the Bags: The Risk Associated with the Introduction of Small Quantities of Fruit and Plants by Airline Passengers.

Authors:  Roberta Pace; Roberta Ascolese; Fortuna Miele; Elia Russo; Raffaele V Griffo; Umberto Bernardo; Francesco Nugnes
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand.

Authors:  Thomas W Bodey; Zachary T Carter; Phillip J Haubrock; Ross N Cuthbert; Melissa J Welsh; Christophe Diagne; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Abiotic and biotic correlates of the occurrence, extent and cover of invasive aquatic Elodea nuttallii.

Authors:  Kate Crane; Louise Kregting; Neil E Coughlan; Ross N Cuthbert; Anthony Ricciardi; Hugh J MacIsaac; Jaimie T A Dick; Neil Reid
Journal:  Freshw Biol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.538

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.