| Literature DB >> 35148793 |
Marta Kożybska1, Jacek Kurpisz2, Iwona Radlińska1, Edyta Skwirczyńska3, Natalia Serwin4, Paulina Zabielska5, Artur Kotwas5, Beata Karakiewicz5, Zofia Lebiecka6, Jerzy Samochowiec6, Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Problematic Internet Use is defined as a use of the Internet which leads to various difficulties. The aim of this study was to check whether Problematic Internet Use is associated with health risks, such as: anti-health behaviors, depressive symptoms, abnormal body weight or eating disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Eating disorders; Health behaviors; Poland; Problematic Internet Use students
Year: 2022 PMID: 35148793 PMCID: PMC8832421 DOI: 10.1186/s12991-022-00384-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Gen Psychiatry ISSN: 1744-859X Impact factor: 3.455
Socio-demographics, Internet use characteristics and PIU, IZZ, BDI, EAT-26 scores
| % | Mean | SD | Me | Q3–Q1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||
| Females | 449 | 83.5 | ||||
| Males | 89 | 16.5 | ||||
| Field of study | ||||||
| Nursing | 163 | 30.3 | ||||
| Physiotherapy | 162 | 30.1 | ||||
| Medical analytics | 36 | 6.7 | ||||
| Cosmetology | 32 | 5.9 | ||||
| Health psychology | 32 | 5.9 | ||||
| Medical biotechnology | 30 | 5.6 | ||||
| Emergency medical services | 29 | 5.4 | ||||
| Dietetics | 25 | 4.6 | ||||
| Obstetrics | 22 | 4.1 | ||||
| Administration and management of health care | 7 | 1.3 | ||||
| Main device | ||||||
| Smartphone | 275 | 51.1 | ||||
| Computer and smartphone comparably | 201 | 37.4 | ||||
| Computer | 62 | 11.5 | ||||
| Main purpose of using the Internet | ||||||
| Communication with others | 200 | 37.2 | ||||
| Entertainment | 106 | 19.7 | ||||
| Studying | 78 | 14.5 | ||||
| Social media | 70 | 13.0 | ||||
| Other | 10 | 1.9 | ||||
| Work | 9 | 1.7 | ||||
| No response or no indication of one main objective | 65 | 12.1 | ||||
| PIU | ||||||
| Overall score | 17.01 | 13.24 | 13 | 16 | ||
| Very low | 20 | 3.7 | ||||
| Low | 196 | 36.4 | ||||
| Medium | 307 | 57.1 | ||||
| High | 15 | 2.8 | ||||
| Very high | 0 | 0 | ||||
| IZZ | ||||||
| Overall score | 76.15 | 14.07 | 77 | 20.75 | ||
| Low | 256 | 47.6 | ||||
| Medium | 191 | 35.5 | ||||
| High | 91 | 16.9 | ||||
| IZZ domain | ||||||
| Healthy eating habits | 3.1 | 0.83 | 3.17 | 1.17 | ||
| Preventive behaviors | 3.16 | 0.81 | 3.17 | 1 | ||
| Positive psychological attitude | 3.41 | 0.77 | 3.5 | 1 | ||
| Pro-health practices | 3.02 | 0.71 | 3 | 0.83 | ||
| BDI | ||||||
| 10 points | 146 | 27.1 | 8.81 | 8.21 | 6 | 9 |
| EAT-26 | ||||||
| 20 points | 37 | 6.9 | 7.83 | 6.68 | 6 | 7 |
PIU Problematic Internet Use Test, IZZ Health-Related Behavior Inventory, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, EAT-26 The Eating Attitudes Test
Comparison of the groups in terms of the PIU score (continuous variable)
| Variables | χ2 and Z scores | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sexa | |||
| Study mode (full time/extramural)a | |||
| Study cycle (bachelor, master, uniform)b | 2 | χ2 = 8.65b | |
| Year of studiesb | 3 | χ2 = 4.09b | NSf |
| Field of studiesb | 9 | χ2 = 32.44b | |
| Preferred device (computer/smartphone/computer and smartphone comparably)b | 2 | χ2 = 11.34b | |
| Purpose of Internet useb | 5 | χ2 = 29.35b | |
| Severity of IZZb, c | 2 | χ2 = 7.26b | |
| BDI risk categorya, d | |||
| EAT risk categorya, e | NS |
aMann–Whitney U test
bKruskal–Wallis test
cIZZ severity—groups of low, medium and high frequency of health-related behaviors
dBDI risk category—comparison of groups which meet and do not meet diagnostic criteria for a depressive episode
eEAT risk category—comparison of groups which meet and do not meet diagnostic criteria for eating disorders
fnot statistically significant
Correlations between PIU scores (continuous variable) and other investigated variables
| PIU | Age | Leisure time | BMI | EAT | BDI | IZZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIU | Spearman Correlation | 1 | −0.071 | −0 | −0 | |||
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.104 | 0.000 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.001 | ||
| N | 538 | 529 | 534 | 538 | 538 | 538 | 538 | |
| Age | Spearman Correlation | −0 | 1 | 0.100 | 0.085 | −0.054 | −0.065 | 0.074 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.104 | 0.022 | 0.052 | 0.216 | 0.133 | 0.088 | ||
| N | 529 | 529 | 525 | 529 | 529 | 529 | 529 | |
| Leisure time | Spearman Correlation | − | 1 | 0.023 | −0.047 | − | ||
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.000 | 0.022 | 0.602 | 0.283 | 0.004 | 0.000 | ||
| N | 534 | 525 | 534 | 534 | 534 | 534 | 534 | |
| BMI | Spearman Correlation | − | 0.085 | 0.023 | 1 | 0.001 | −0.017 | |
| significance (bilateral) | 0.03 | 0.052 | 0.602 | 0.049 | 0.988 | 0.694 | ||
| N | 538 | 529 | 534 | 538 | 538 | 538 | 538 | |
| EAT-26 | Spearman Correlation | –0.054 | −0.047 | 0.085 | 1 | −0.031 | ||
| significance (bilateral) | 0.002 | 0.216 | 0.283 | 0.049 | 0.000 | 0.473 | ||
| N | 538 | 529 | 534 | 538 | 538 | 538 | 538 | |
| BDI | Spearman Correlation | –0.065 | − | 0.001 | 1 | − | ||
| significance (bilateral) | 0.000 | 0.133 | 0.004 | 0.988 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| N | 538 | 529 | 534 | 538 | 538 | 538 | 538 | |
| IZZ | Spearman Correlation | − | 0.074 | 0.017 | −0.031 | − | 1 | |
| significance (bilateral) | 0.001 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 0.694 | 0.473 | 0.000 | ||
| N | 538 | 529 | 534 | 538 | 538 | 538 | 538 | |
aCorrelation is significant at 0.01 (bilateral)
bCorrelation is significant at 0.05 (bilateral)
PIU Problematic Internet Use scored, BMI Body Mass Index score, EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test score, BDI Beck Depression Inventory score, IZZ Health-Related Behavior Inventory score
Comparison of PIU risk groups in terms of the investigated variables (categorical variable)
| Variablesa | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 3 | 1.57 | NS |
| Amount of leisure time per day | 3 | 17.65 | |
| Year of study | 3 | 0.99 | NS |
| BMI | 3 | 2.18 | NS |
| IZZ | 3 | 16.63 | |
| BDI | 3 | 55.17 | |
| EAT-26 | 3 | 13.93 |
aKruskal–Wallis test for groups at a very low, low, average, high risk of PIU
BMI Body Mass Index score, IZZ Health-Related Behavior Inventory score, BDI Beck Depression Inventory score, EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test score, NS not statistically significant