Literature DB >> 3514826

Occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridges of cross-arch extension. II. Unilateral posterior two-unit cantilevers.

D Lundgren, L Laurell.   

Abstract

The pattern of axially (perpendicular to the occlusal plane) directed occlusal forces developed during light tooth tapping in habitual occlusion, chewing, swallowing and maximal biting was studied in twelve subjects whose dentitions were periodontally treated and prosthetically restored with cross-arch bridges with unilateral posterior two-unit cantilevers. The measuring devices consisted of four strain-gauge transducers uniformly and bilaterally mounted in pontics of maxillary bridges to represent the posterior (end abutment and distal cantilever respectively) and anterior regions. Thus, the forces could be studied locally in various parts of the dentition simultaneously as well as totally over the entire dentition. The results demonstrated that the distal cantilever unit, on average, was subjected to forces about or less than half of those over the contralateral end abutment unit irrespective of the activity studied. Furthermore, the cantilever forces either equalled or were even significantly smaller than those of the anterior regions. All subjects preferred the end abutment side as the chewing side. When the cantilever side was used as the chewing side, which occurred most infrequently, the bolus was usually located in the anterior region. The mean total chewing force (about 50 N) was only about half of that found in a previous study of subjects supplied with cross-arch bridges with bilateral end abutments (Lundgren & Laurell, 1985). Furthermore, on average only 26% of the voluntary muscular capacity was used during chewing, compared with 37% in the 'bilateral end abutment group' referred to. The reasons for the comparably small forces over the distal cantilever unit and the lower muscular utilization during chewing in cross-bridges with unilateral posterior two-unit cantilevers as well as the implications of the findings for the dimension of such bridge constructions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3514826     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb00651.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  The remodeling of alveolar bone supporting the mandibular first molar with different levels of periodontal attachment.

Authors:  Yanfang Zhao; Weifeng Wang; Haitao Xin; Shunlai Zang; Zhiyuan Zhang; Yulu Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Maxillary rehabilitation of periodontally compromised patients with extensive one-piece fixed prostheses supported by natural teeth: a retrospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alexander Heschl; Michael Haas; Josef Haas; Michael Payer; Walther Wegscheider; Raoul Polansky
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Assessment of various factors for feasibility of fixed cantilever bridge: a review study.

Authors:  Ashu Sharma; G R Rahul; Soorya T Poduval; Karunakar Shetty
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-03-01

4.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution pattern in a mandibular first molar tooth restored with five different restorative materials.

Authors:  Kathleen Manuela D'souza; Meena Ajay Aras
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  Stress distribution among periodontally compromised abutments: A comparative study using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Rajkiran Chitumalla; Swapna Munaga; Amit Khare; Surendra Agarwal; Anjali Bhoyar; Swapnil Parlani
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.