Volcanoes around the world vary tremendously in terms of how often they erupt and the composition and amount of their emissions. Some lie dormant for decades and then experience a large explosion, like Mount St. Helens in Washington state. Others, like Montserrat’s Soufrière Hills or Kīlauea in Hawai’i, simmer, so to speak, emitting lava, ash, and gases over decades, continuously exposing local populations.Volcanic emissions include sulfur dioxide (), hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen fluoride,[9] a highly soluble gas that becomes hydrofluoric acid in water and can contaminate water supplies.[10,11]
exposures following volcanic eruptions have been associated with increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses and deaths.[12,13,14] High levels of typically occur with so-called effusive eruptions, in which lava flows over the ground, such as the fall 2021 eruption of Cumbre Vieja in the Canary Islands.[15]
reacts with oxygen and moisture to create a hazy mixture of gas and fine particles called volcanic smog, or vog.[16]The emissions hazards at any volcano can change. For example, communities on the Big Island of Hawai’i have lived with vog more or less continuously since the early 1980s, says David Damby, a research scientist for the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Volcano Hazard Program. But the huge pulse of ash ejected during the 2018 Kīlauea eruption—the first in almost a century—added a new hazard for residents downwind.The air around Nyiragongo contains extremely high concentrations of owing to both passive degassing and active eruptions.[17,18] In addition to sulfurous gases, carbon dioxide () escapes through fractures on the volcano’s flanks.[19] Because it is heavier than oxygen, the gas sinks into low-lying depressions to form pockets of air known as mazuku (“evil winds” in Swahili), which kill livestock and people alike.[19] Few studies have examined the human health impact of mazuku, although the phenomenon is well known to local populations.[19]
Mazuku occurs in other volcanic areas such as Mammoth Mountain in eastern California[20] and Mount Amiata in central Italy.[21]Gases can also saturate water bodies near volcanoes. Earthquakes and gas saturation of the water are thought to increase the chances of a limnic eruption, in which a cloud of is released from the water. In 1986, a limnic eruption at Cameroon’s Lake Nyos killed approximately 1,700 people.[22] Lake Kivu, near Goma, contains the equivalent of 2.6 gigatons of , as well as methane;[23] a limnic eruption here would put millions of people at risk.[24]A degassing system was engineered and installed on Lake Nyos after the 1986 eruption. The same has been called for on Lake Kivu by the United Nations Environment Program’s Division of Early Warning and Assessment[25] and others[26] but has not been implemented. Methane harvesting does occur in Lake Kivu in both DRC and neighboring Rwanda, but whether it reduces the chances of a limnic eruption is unclear.[27]In 1986, Lake Nyos in Cameroon, released a cloud of into the atmosphere in what is known as a limnic eruption. The event killed 1,700 people and 3,500 domestic animals. Engineers installed piping anchored to a raft (left) to artificially remove the gas from the lake to prevent similar disasters in the future. The self-driven fountain (right), which can reach a height of above the lake surface, dissipates the . Both images: Bill Evans/U.S. Geological Survey.Caroline Michellier, a postdoctoral geography researcher at the Royal Museum for Central Africa in Belgium, says that water contamination from volcanic emissions is potentially more problematic to public health than inhaling ash or gases. Past research on Nyiragongo has documented eruption-related contamination of rainwater—the main source of drinking water for local rural populations—with heavy metals and acidic halogens, including fluoride and chloride.[24,28,29] “The water available in the area surrounding the volcano is contaminated by volcanic gas particles due to the permanent plume that can spread over a large distance,” she says. “These particles make the water unsafe to drink.”
Planning for disasters and establishing local expertise can prevent or minimize the many consequences of volcanic eruptions, including loss of life, psychological trauma, disease outbreaks, and more. In one such effort, IVHHN is working to create an organization of experts available during eruption crises. It offers an online hub for evidence-based information on volcanic impacts on health and guidance for responding to emergencies.The idea for IVHHN had its roots in the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Those who responded to the event realized early that a coordinated, multiagency effort was needed, drawing on scientists and practitioners from a wide range of disciplines. “A large number of people became involved in research, but there was no network to bring their expertise together. And then the eruption finished, and people went back to their day jobs,” says Horwell.During Horwell’s later graduate research on Soufrière Hills, she talked to people in various disciplines: toxicologists, medics, public health specialists, chemists, environmental scientists, and geologists. “I was building a network around me, and it became clear to me that this should be more formalized.” With support from her advisor, Steve Sparks, she created IVHHN in 2003.“The network aims to make as much information as accessible in as many languages and through as many channels as possible, so that people have actionable information during a volcanic crisis,” says Damby, who with Horwell is one of four codirectors of IVHHN. Although most volcanologists know of the network, many local health agencies do not. IVHHN researchers are raising awareness of their knowledge bank at the local level so emergency managers and others can tap into the network’s expertise.Red triangles mark locations of active volcanoes across the world. In 2015, more than people were estimated to live within of a volcano, a distance within which they could potentially experience direct impacts of an eruption.[62] Image: Worldinmaps.comMeanwhile, the Center for the Study of Active Volcanoes (CSAV) in Hilo, Hawai’i, runs an international training program to provide low- and middle-income countries with local capacity to manage volcano hazards. The center was created after the disastrous 1985 eruption of Colombia’s Nevado del Ruiz. “It was pretty well known the volcano was building to an eruption, but Colombia simply didn’t have the [capacity] to make decisions on evacuating the population,” says center director Don Thomas. “The end result was that 23,000 people were killed by a relatively small eruption and one where the deaths were entirely preventable.[57] Everyone that was killed could have walked to safety if they knew what to do.”The Volcano Disaster Assistance Program, a partnership between the U.S. Agency for International Development and USGS, often provides instructors for CSAV courses. “We’ve held classes since 1990 where we bring folks in, predominantly from developing countries, and provide them with training on a full spectrum of methods for checking the pulse of an active volcano,” says Thomas. This training can help save lives as well as reduce exposures and health risks.The CSAV international training program provides low- and middle-income countries with local expertise for managing volcano hazards. Top left: trainees from the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, and the Marianas Islands set up a Global Positioning System receiver. Bottom left: Jeff Sutton of the Hawai’i Volcano Observatory explains how a continuous gas sampling monitor works. Right: A trainee from China samples molten lava. All images: Center for the Study of Active Volcanoes.From Nyiragongo to Kīlauea, Soufrière Hills, and beyond, scientists continue to study the impacts of volcanoes on human health, eruption by eruption, so their impacts can be understood and minimized. Volcanic threats to human livelihood, health, and life—not to mention climate and the economy—have the potential to be globally catastrophic. For instance, the 1815 eruption of Tambora in Indonesia—the biggest eruption in recorded history—had such a profound impact on climate worldwide that it led to the “Year Without a Summer” in 1816 due to volcanic ash and aerosols blocking the sun.[58]“[Tambora] pumped a lot of sulfur into the stratosphere, and that changed the climate. There were frosts in New England in June, crops were destroyed and damaged. The growing season was short on both sides of the Atlantic,” explains University of Cambridge volcanologist Clive Oppenheimer. “There’s a pretty credible argument linking that eruption to the food crisis and outbreaks of typhus in Ireland.”Even moderate eruptions can cause economic disruption. For example, when Iceland’s Eyjafjallajökull erupted in 2010, the ash traveled unusually far for an event of its size.[59] Travel and trade disruptions cost the global economy an estimated in the first week alone.[60]To some, volcanic eruptions may seem like isolated news events far away. However, a large eruption like Tambora will eventually happen again, potentially disrupting climate and causing food crises and disease outbreaks far away. The January 2022 eruption of Hunga-Tonga-Hunga-Ha’apai in the Tongan archipelago literally sent shock waves around the world;[61] the impacts of this event are still unfolding. More importantly, though, even “typical” eruptions have a major impact on the populations nearby. And while living with the clear and present danger of a volcanic eruption is a way of life for some communities, like those near Nyiragongo, supporting resiliency efforts for these communities can help reduce harmful impacts when volcanoes do erupt. That goes not only for people in the path of danger but also for those around the world who may someday be affected.
Authors: Emilio Cuoco; Dario Tedesco; Robert J Poreda; Jeremy C Williams; Stefano De Francesco; Charles Balagizi; Thomas H Darrah Journal: J Hazard Mater Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 10.588
Authors: Claire J Horwell; Benedict J Williamson; Ken Donaldson; Jennifer S Le Blond; David E Damby; Leon Bowen Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: Magnús T Gudmundsson; Thorvaldur Thordarson; Armann Höskuldsson; Gudrún Larsen; Halldór Björnsson; Fred J Prata; Björn Oddsson; Eyjólfur Magnússon; Thórdís Högnadóttir; Guðrún Nína Petersen; Chris L Hayward; John A Stevenson; Ingibjörg Jónsdóttir Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 4.379