Literature DB >> 3514812

Multiple axon collaterals of single corticospinal axons in the cat spinal cord.

Y Shinoda, T Yamaguchi, T Futami.   

Abstract

To investigate intraspinal branching patterns of single corticospinal neurons (CSNs), we recorded extracellular spike activities from cell bodies of 408 CSNs in the motor cortex in anesthetized cats and mapped the distribution of effective stimulating sites for antidromic activation of their terminal branches in the spinal gray matter. To search for all spinal axon branches belonging to single CSNs in the "forelimb area" of the motor cortex, we microstimulated the gray matter from the dorsal to the ventral border at 100-micron intervals at an intensity of 150-250 microA and systematically mapped effective stimulating penetrations at 1-mm intervals rostrocaudally from C3 to the most caudal level of their axons. From the depth-threshold curves, the comparison of the antidromic latencies of spikes evoked from the gray matter and the lateral funiculus, and the calculated conduction times of the collaterals, we could ascertain that axon collaterals were stimulated in the gray matter rather than stem axons in the corticospinal tract due to current spread. Virtually all CSNs examined in the forelimb area of the motor cortex had three to seven branches at widely separated segments of the cervical and the higher thoracic cord. In addition to terminating at the brachial segments, they had one to three collaterals to the upper cervical cord (C3-C4), where the propriospinal neurons projecting to forelimb motoneurons are located. About three quarters of these CSNs had two to four collaterals in C6-T1. This finding held true for both fast and slow CSNs. About one third of the CSNs in the forelimb area of the motor cortex projected to the thoracic cord below T3. These CSNs also sent axon collaterals to the cervical spinal cord. CSNs in the "hindlimb area" of the motor cortex had three to five axon branches in the lumbosacral cord. These branches were mainly observed at L4 and the lower lumbosacral cord. None of these CSNs had axon collaterals in the cervical cord. CSNs terminating at different segments of the cervical and the thoracic cord were distributed in a wide area of the motor cortex and were intermingled. To determine the detailed trajectory of single axon branches, microstimulation was made at a matrix of points of 100 or 200 micron at the maximum intensity of 30 microA, and their axonal trajectory was reconstructed on the basis of the location of low-threshold foci and the latency of antidromic spikes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3514812     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.55.3.425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

Review 1.  What can studying musicians tell us about motor control of the hand?

Authors:  Alan H D Watson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Pyramidal tract neurons receptive to different forelimb joints act differently during locomotion.

Authors:  Erik E Stout; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Robustness of muscle synergies underlying three-dimensional force generation at the hand in healthy humans.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation on mouse spinal network and complex multijoint movements.

Authors:  Zaghloul Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Transneuronal transport of wheat germ agglutinin conjugated horseradish peroxidase into last order spinal interneurones projecting to acromio- and spinodeltoideus motoneurones in the cat. 2. Differential labelling of interneurones depending on movement type.

Authors:  B Alstermark; H Kümmel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A Brain-Spinal Interface (BSI) System-on-Chip (SoC) for Closed-Loop Cortically-Controlled Intraspinal Microstimulation.

Authors:  Shahab Shahdoost; Shawn B Frost; David J Guggenmos; Jordan Borrell; Caleb Dunham; Scott Barbay; Randolph J Nudo; Pedram Mohseni
Journal:  Analog Integr Circuits Signal Process       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Tests for presynaptic modulation of corticospinal terminals from peripheral afferents and pyramidal tract in the macaque.

Authors:  A Jackson; S N Baker; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Muscle synergies during locomotion in the cat: a model for motor cortex control.

Authors:  Trevor Drew; John Kalaska; Nedialko Krouchev
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Differential connections by intracortical axon collaterals among pyramidal tract cells in the cat motor cortex.

Authors:  Y Kang; K Endo; T Araki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: cortical motor maps in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  L J Streletz; J K Belevich; S M Jones; A Bhushan; S H Shah; G J Herbison
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.