Young Shin Cho1, Miyoung Moon1, Gábor Holló2, István Lagzi2,3, Sung Ho Yang1. 1. Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education (KNUE), Chungbuk 28173, Republic of Korea. 2. MTA-BME Condensed Matter Physics Research Group, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest H-1111, Hungary. 3. Department of Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest H-1111, Hungary.
Abstract
The Liesegang phenomenon is a spontaneous pattern formation, which is a periodic distribution of the precipitate discovered in diffusion-limited systems. Over the past century, it has been experimentally attempted to control the periodicity of patterns and structures of precipitates by varying the concentration of the hydrogel or electrolytes, adding organic or inorganic impurities, and applying an electric or pH field. In this work, the periodic patterns of calcium phosphate were manipulated with an anionic macromolecular additive inspired by bone mineralization in which various noncollagenous proteins are involved in the formation of a polymer-induced liquid precursor. The periodic patterns were systematically controlled by adjusting the amount of poly(acrylic acid), and they were numerically simulated by adjusting the threshold concentration of nucleation. The change of the pattern is explained by improved stability and directional diffusion of the intermediate.
The Liesegang phenomenon is a spontaneous pattern formation, which is a periodic distribution of the precipitate discovered in diffusion-limited systems. Over the past century, it has been experimentally attempted to control the periodicity of patterns and structures of precipitates by varying the concentration of the hydrogel or electrolytes, adding organic or inorganic impurities, and applying an electric or pH field. In this work, the periodic patterns of calcium phosphate were manipulated with an anionic macromolecular additive inspired by bone mineralization in which various noncollagenous proteins are involved in the formation of a polymer-induced liquid precursor. The periodic patterns were systematically controlled by adjusting the amount of poly(acrylic acid), and they were numerically simulated by adjusting the threshold concentration of nucleation. The change of the pattern is explained by improved stability and directional diffusion of the intermediate.
The spontaneous self-organization
and self-assembly of components
into controllable microstructures and periodic patterns have gained
growing interest in the field of material science.[1−4] The Liesegang phenomenon is one
of the spontaneous pattern formation, which is a periodic distribution
of the precipitate discovered in diffusion-limited systems. Over the
past century, numerical models have been developed for explaining
the spatial periodicity of Liesegang patterns and for improving their
accuracy, regularities, and validity in terms of macroscopic quantities
such as the position of the precipitation zones, their appearance
time, and widths.[5] On the other hand, it
has been experimentally attempted to control the periodicity of patterns
and structures of precipitates[2,5−13] with aims of potential applications in materials science for a bottom-up
fabrication tool,[3,14] as well as fundamental studies
in biogenic and geological patterns.[15−17] The pattern and structures
have been controlled by varying the concentration of the hydrogel
or electrolytes, adding organic or inorganic impurities, and applying
electric or pH fields.[8,10−13,18−20]In most previous studies, the Liesegang phenomenon
has been numerically
interpreted based on a simple precipitation mechanism. However, in
the view of crystallization, the phenomenon could be interpreted as
more complicated processes including nucleation, growth, and phase
transformation.[21] Furthermore, there is
an increasing number of discoveries, suggesting that the phenomenon
occurs through the attachment of amorphous intermediate particles
larger than atoms/ions/molecules.[22−24] In a recent crystallization
theory, it has been emphasized to investigate characteristic properties
of amorphous intermediates, such as their stability, diffusivity,
or reactivity.[25−27] In this context, the recent viewpoint of crystallization
can give insight into the control and interpretation of the Liesegang
phenomenon.The field of crystallization and biomineralization
has drawn great
attention because organic/inorganic hybrid materials formed by a biological
process have superior mechanical properties such as high stiffness,
toughness, and low brittleness.[28−30] Among the many biominerals, calcium
phosphate (CaP), the main component of hard tissues of vertebrates,
has been intensively studied with the purpose of biomedical treatment
on physical damage or loss of bone, as well as fundamental understanding
of the pathological pathway of bone disease.[31,32] In the process of bone formation, various noncollagenous proteins
(NCPs) are involved in the formation and transformation of biogenic
CaP through specific interactions at the inorganic/organic interface.[33] For example, mineralization inhibitors, including
osteopontin, osteocalcin, and fetuin, stabilize amorphous calcium
phosphate (ACP), which is an intermediate precursor for a mature bone.[33,34] In the early stage of mineralization, it is generally postulated
that ACP stabilized by NCPs has a liquidlike property called the polymer-induced
liquid precursor (PILP).[35,36] Because of its fluidity,
NCP-stabilized ACP can infiltrate into the supramolecular structure
of collagen by capillary action or electrostatic interactions. Many
of the NCPs are negatively charged caused by abundant carboxylate
groups in aspartic and glutamic acid residues.[37] By mimicking the anionic nature of NCPs, anionic organic
polymers such as poly-l-aspartic acid (pAsp) or poly(acrylic
acid) (PAA) have been used for controlling the nucleation and growth
of CaP.[36,38] The biomimetic process has been widely used
for producing integrated organic/inorganic structures by taking full
advantage of polyanionic-stabilized mineral precursors including wettability,
morphological changeability, and diffusible abilities.Recently,
we found the inhomogeneity in single bands of CaP Liesegang
patterns formed under slow and controlled diffusion in a gelatin medium.
It was demonstrated that the overall structure of each band was dependent
on the diffusive properties of ACP precursors.[21] Although anionic polymers have been used in biomimetic
approaches to generate complicated microstructures of biogenic materials,
it has not been used to control the Liesegang phenomenon. In a few
previous reports, soluble organic molecules have been added to control
polymorphs, composition, and hierarchical organization of CaCO3 and BaCO3.[39,40] However, generated
periodic patterns were formed only at the surface of a single crystal,
and it was not spatially extended.[39,40] We speculated
that the periodic patterns of the Liesegang bands also can be precisely
controlled by adopting the role of NCPs that stabilize the intermediates
during biomineralization.Inspired by biomineralization, here,
we show, for the first time,
how to control CaP Liesegang patterns with an organic macromolecular
additive in contrast to the previous reports that have used single
ions or molecules. PAA was used as an analog of NCPs, and CaP crystallization
was performed in a gelatin hydrogel mimicking a collagen matrix. The
periodic patterns were systematically controlled by the amount of
PAA, and they were numerically simulated by adjusting the threshold
concentration of the nucleation. The change in the pattern is explained
by the improved stability and fluidity of the intermediate.
Experimental Section
Materials
Calcium
nitrate tetrahydrate (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 99%). Sodium phosphate dibasic
(Na2HPO4, 99.0%), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA, MW
= 1.8 kDa, viscosity: ≤2000 cP, Tg: 106 °C), and gelatin
(type A, gel strength 300) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and
ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm) from a Direct-Q system (Merck Millipore,
Germany) was used.
Settings
The hydrogel was prepared
by mixing 3.5% (w/v)
gelatin with a 0.05 M Na2HPO4 solution, and
the mixture was heated to 65 °C until the solution become homogenous.
In the experiments with PAA polymers, a solution of PAA was also added
to the Na2HPO4 solution initially to give the
desired concentration (0.01, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/mL) depending on the
experimental condition. Then, the obtained hot gel solution was cooled
at room temperature for gelation. After that, crystallization experiments
were performed in a single-diffusion system in which the Ca(NO3)2·4H2O solution was poured into
the preformed gelatin gel mixture. Subsequently, the reaction was
observed at room temperature for 5 days.
Characterization
The structure of each band was identified
with an intensity profile based on the variation of lightness. The
photograph was converted to an 8-bit image, and the lightness of each
pixel was measured with the gray level using Image J. The spatiotemporal
development of a single band was obtained from the setup for a cylindrical
hydrogel, which was used in our previous work.[21] Three-dimensional (3D) curves were recorded using a camcorder
(HDR-CX360, Sony, Japan) and processed with the line profile function
of MATLAB (R2017a, The Mathworks, Inc., USA). The morphology of CaP
precipitates was investigated by field emission scanning electron
microscopy (SEM, FEI Co., Netherlands). For SEM analysis, the gel
column containing crystalized CaP was sliced into sections, and the
precipitate in these slices was dehydrated in 98% ethanol solution.
The dehydrated gels were critical-point-dried with carbon dioxide
(CO2) using a critical point dryer (SAMDRI-PVT-3D, Tousimis,
USA). The surface and the cutting edge of the samples were identified
with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV after sputter-coating with platinum.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Alpha eco-ATR, Bruker
Optik Co., Germany) and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert
PRO MRD, Cu Kα = 1.54 Å, PAN Analytical, Netherlands) were
used to investigate crystalline phases. The samples were prepared
by washing with distilled water for 1 day to thoroughly eliminate
sodium chloride and then dried with a freeze dryer (TFD8503, IlShinBioBase,
Korea). The X-ray tube was operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. In experiments
to trace the pH variation during the band formation, a few drops of
the indicator (universal indicator or bromocresol purple) were added
to the mixture of 3.5% (w/v) gelatin and 0.05 M Na2HPO4 solution. In all bands, the color of the universal indicator
always changed first, and the color change of bromocresol purple was
followed. The hydrogel’s spatial pH was measured using a pH
meter (Seven Compact, pH/Ion meter S220, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland).
The diameter of the pH electrode (Mettler Toledo InLab Ultra-micro
pH electrode) is 3 mm.
Simulation
The reaction–diffusion
system (a
set of partial differential equations) was solved numerically using
the method of lines technique: spatial discretization of the partial
differential equations (eq ) on an equidistant grid combined with a forward Euler method
for the integration in time. We applied the following initial conditions a(t = 0, x) = 0, b(t = 0, x) = 1.0, c(t = 0, x) = 0, p(t = 0, x) = 0, and d(t = 0, x) = 0 to reflect
the initial conditions in the experiments, namely, phosphate ions
were uniformly distributed in the gel. We applied the Dirichlet boundary
condition at x = 0 and no-flux boundary conditions
at x = L for all chemical species,
where L is the length of the simulation domain. At x = 0, we applied the following Dirichlet boundary condition
for the chemical species of A: a(t, x = 0) = 1.0 (the concentrations of other chemical
species at the boundary were zero), to reflect the fact that the calcium
ions diffused from outside into the gel, keeping its concentration
constant overtime at the gel interface (x = 0). All
quantities and parameters are in dimensionless units.
Result and
Discussion
As Ca2+ diffused into gelatin hydrogel
containing HPO42–, the periodic precipitation
bands of
calcium phosphate (CaP) crystals were formed in the hydrogel. Four
different systems were tested for investigating the influence of the
macromolecular additive on the periodic bands of CaP by varying the
concentration of PAA. In a control experiment, periodic precipitation
was observed (Figure a). The pattern was confirmed as the Liesegang phenomenon by three
laws: the spacing law, the time law, and the width law (Supporting
Information, Figure S1). The width of the
single bands was narrowed by the addition of PAA (0.01 mg/mL) and
gradually decreased by increasing the amount of PAA (0.1 mg/mL) (Figure b, c). In a high
concentration of PAA (2 mg/mL), a continuous precipitation zone was
formed without the formation of periodic bands (Figure d). The opacity profile also confirmed the
effect of the PAA additive (Figure ). The opacity of each band was measured by the gray
value obtained from the 8-bit digital images. In a control experiment,
the typical pattern of Liesegang bands was observed as mentioned in
our previous report.[21] A continuous band
was formed at the near reservoir, and periodic patterns consisted
of asymmetric bands (Figure a). As the concentration of PAA increased, the opacity profile
of each band became sharper, and the intensity was decreased (Figure b, c). In the case
of 1.0 mg/mL PAA, the continuous band became wider, and the number
of bands decreased. In the presence of 2.0 mg/mL PAA, the pattern
disappeared, and a continuous band was formed with low intensity (Figure d). Because the amount
of the precipitate is proportional to the opacity, the decreased opacity
(caused by PAA) indicates that the density of the precipitate is reduced
by the addition of PAA. The trend is consistent with the previous
report that crystallization is generally inhibited by an interaction
between anionic macromolecules and precursors.
Figure 1
Photograph (left) and
its gray value profile (right) of Liesegang
patterns formed in hydrogels. The PAA concentration is (a) 0, (b)
0.01, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 mg/mL. Black arrows indicate the direction
of the diffusion of Ca2+ ions.
Photograph (left) and
its gray value profile (right) of Liesegang
patterns formed in hydrogels. The PAA concentration is (a) 0, (b)
0.01, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 mg/mL. Black arrows indicate the direction
of the diffusion of Ca2+ ions.The process of a single band formation in Liesegang patterns was
spatiotemporally investigated (Figure ). As the density of the precipitate can be inferred
by the intensity of lightness in a hydrogel, the development of a
single band was visualized with three-dimensional (3D) plots based
on the variation of gray values at each location in real time. The
density of CaP in every single band was assigned as different colors,
depending on its numerical gray value as a function of diffusion distance
and time. The lines indicated that the process of single band formation
was varied, depending on the concentration of PAA. In the presence
of 0.01 and 1 mg/mL PAA, a single band was formed much faster than
in a control experiment, and the width of the band dramatically decreased
(Figure a–c).
In the case of 2 mg/mL of PAA, a continuous band with weak intensity
was sequentially formed along the Ca2+ diffusion direction
(Figure d). The band
formation process could be traced by a color change of the indicator
because protons are released when the Ca2+ ions react with
HPO42– (Figure e, f). Because of the decreasing pH during
crystallization, it is possible to infer the crystallization process
by identifying the change in pH. Two different indicators were used
to track the pH change from 8 to ∼6 with the universal indicator
and from 8 to <5 with bromocresol purple. Although pH 6 and 5 did
not indicate the exact point of crystal nucleation and maturation,
the color change of the two indicators could be used to identify the
rate of crystallization in every band formation process. When the
precursors were formed at the reaction front, the pH decreased, which
could be measured by the color change of the universal indicator from
green to yellow. As crystallization proceeded, the pH decreased further,
which could be indicated by the color change of bromocresol purple
from purple to yellow. The band located farther from the Ca2+ reservoir had a longer time interval between the color change of
the two indicators. It is noticeable that the time interval for the
two indicators became longer when PAA was added in hydrogel even at
nearly the same distance. For example, at ∼4.0 cm (n = 11, nth band), the color of the universal
indicator changed at ∼60 h and that of bromocresol purple changed
at ∼80 h in the control experiments, which means that the time
interval for color change of both indicators was ∼20 h (Figure e). In contrast,
in the presence of 1 mg/mL of PAA, the time interval for color change
of both indicators was ∼33 h at the same distance (n = 10); the universal indicator changed its color at ∼47
h and bromocresol purple did at ∼80 h (Figure f). In summary, the results indicate that
it takes a longer incubation time for nucleation, but the band is
rapidly grown once the crystallization starts in the presence of PAA.
Figure 2
Single
band formation analyzed spatiotemporally: (a) control, (b)
0.01, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 mg/mL of PAA. Graph of color change measured
by universal (Black Circle) and bromocresol purple (Black Square)
indicators. The PAA concentration is (e) 0 and (f) 1.0 mg/mL.
Single
band formation analyzed spatiotemporally: (a) control, (b)
0.01, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 mg/mL of PAA. Graph of color change measured
by universal (Black Circle) and bromocresol purple (Black Square)
indicators. The PAA concentration is (e) 0 and (f) 1.0 mg/mL.In fact, PAA is an acidic polymer that can influence
the pH of
the hydrogel, and this can directly affect the mineralization of CaP.
To verify the pH change in the whole process of band formation, the
spatial pH distribution of the hydrogels was measured according to
the distance from the interface of the Ca2+ reservoir after
5 days of reaction in the presence of PAAs of 0, 0.01, 0.1, and 0.2
mg/mL, respectively (Supporting Information, Figure S2). Because protons are continuously released during crystallization,
the degree of crystallization can be inferred from the pH change.
The pH at ∼35 mm became lower as a function of the PAA concentration,
which means that the pH of the hydrogel become acidic with the addition
of PAA in the initial stage. Although the pH range varied in 6.5–7.5,
the pH difference is negligible at such neutral conditions. In addition,
the final pH converged into 4.3–4.5 as crystallization proceeded
regardless of the concentration of PAA. The result indicated that
the overall crystallization process occurred under similar pH conditions.
Therefore, it was concluded that the effect of initial pH caused by
the acidity of PAA was tolerable in our system.The patterns
were characterized by FT-IR and XRD (Figure ). In the control experiment,
it was confirmed that the patterns are composed of octacalcium phosphate
(OCP) by the peaks at 1121, 1103, 1023, and 962 cm–1 in the FT-IR spectrum, which is assigned as the ν3 vibration of PO43– in OCP (Figure a, black line).[41] The XRD pattern also confirmed the characteristic
peaks of OCP at 4.7°, 27.4°, 31.7°, and 33.6°
which are indexed as (100), (41-1), (3-11)/(41-1), and (5-30) planes
in OCP crystals, respectively (Figure b, black line).[42] As the
concentration of PAA increased, the intensity of peaks decreased generally
in FT-IR spectra. However, it is noticeable that a peak at 1040 cm–1 became characteristic in the spectrum of 2.0 mg/mL
PAA, which is attributed to the amorphous nature of CaP (Figure a, green line).[43] It indicated that the final phase of CaP was
ACP under the high concentration of PAA. The amorphous nature of CaP
formed with PAA was also supported by XRD analysis. The peaks originating
from the OCP crystal were reduced in the spectrum of 0.01 mg/mL PAA
(Figure b, red line)
and disappeared in the spectra of both 0.1 and 1 mg/mL PAA (Figure b, blue and green
line). Instead, a broad peak was detected at 21°, which is assigned
as ACP.[44] The results mean that the phase
of CaP was changed from OCP to ACP as a function of PAA. The crystal
phase of CaP formed after 1 h reaction was also investigated with
XRD analysis (Supporting Information, Figure S3). In contrast to 24 h samples, the dominant phase of CaP at 1 h
was ACP regardless of the concentration of PAA. This implies that
ACP was commonly formed in the early stage of band formation in all
experimental conditions. Considering that the peak assigned to OCP
becomes less prominent as the PAA concentration increases, it is reasonable
that PAA stabilizes the ACP and inhibits the transformation of ACP
into OCP. It is further supported by XRD analysis on 1 h samples;
the intensity of small peaks of (3-11)/(41-1) and (5-30) planes in
OCP increased as the concentration of PAA decreased. Based on the
results, we speculated that the variation of Liesegang patterns resulted
from different stabilities of ACP during the crystallization caused
by PAA.
Figure 3
(a) FT-IR and (b) XRD of CaP formed in hydrogels. The PAA concentration
is 0 (black), 0.01 (red), 1.0 (blue), and (d) 2.0 mg/mL (green).
(a) FT-IR and (b) XRD of CaP formed in hydrogels. The PAA concentration
is 0 (black), 0.01 (red), 1.0 (blue), and (d) 2.0 mg/mL (green).For more detailed analysis, the microstructures
of the composite
were observed by SEM. In a control, platelike crystals were observed
on a micrometer scale (Figure a). With the addition of 0.01 mg/mL PAA, the shape of crystals
changed to the ribbon-like structure, which looked like a diminished
structure of platelike crystals in a control (Figure b). In the presence of 1 mg/mL PAA, more
diminished crystals were embedded in the gelatin network (Figure c and Supporting
Information, Figure S4c). Using 2 mg/mL
of PAA, only nanometer-sized granules were attached to the network
(Figure d and Supporting
Information, Figure S4d). Decreased sizes
and diminished structures suggest that overall crystallization including
nucleation and growth was inhibited by PAA. Considering that the platelike
and spherical shape is a typical structure of OCP[21,45] and ACP,[46] the variation of the CaP shape
indicates that the growth of OCP and transformation of ACP into OCP
were more inhibited by the function of PAA that was consistent with
the XRD analysis. Also, dangled precipitation on the gelatin surface
at a high PAA concentration is similar to previous reports that explain
the intrafibrillar mineralization of CaP induced by the addition of
anionic polyelectrolytes.[35,36]
Figure 4
SEM micrograph of CaP
formed in hydrogels. The PAA concentration
is (a) 0, (b) 0.01, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 mg/mL. The scale bar is 500
nm [inset in (d): 200 nm]. Yellow arrows indicate dangled CaP particles
on the gelatin hydrogel.
SEM micrograph of CaP
formed in hydrogels. The PAA concentration
is (a) 0, (b) 0.01, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 mg/mL. The scale bar is 500
nm [inset in (d): 200 nm]. Yellow arrows indicate dangled CaP particles
on the gelatin hydrogel.
Simulations
To
describe and understand the variation
of the pattern in the experiments, we modified a reaction–diffusion
model, which has been used for describing asymmetric CaP Liesegang
bands in our previous work.[21] The system
is described by a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) that
have the formwhere c, D, and r are the concentrations, diffusion
coefficients, and kinetic
terms of the corresponding chemical species, respectively, and ∇
is the Nabla operator. The numerical solution of eq describes the spatiotemporal pattern formation.Our model comprises four independent processes. Precipitation is
described with the corresponding chemical rates (v) and rate constants (k) to describe pattern formation:where a, b, c, p, and d are the concentrations of the
chemical species A (Ca2+), B (HPO42–), C (intermediate), P (precipitate),
and D (Ca2+-PAA complex), respectively, Θ is the
Heaviside step function, and c*, α*, and p* are the threshold concentrations of precipitation processes
described by eqs −5, respectively. We used chemical equations (eqs −5) in a form having 2P as a product to reflect the mass conservation.The initial step in the precipitation mechanism is the formation
of the intermediate shown in eq , and a sufficiently large reaction rate constant (k1) means that it is readily formed. When the
concentration of the intermediate exceeds the critical threshold concentration
(c*), the intermediates aggregate each other and
subsequently transformed to crystalline precipitates described in eq . Once the precipitate
is generated, it can grow easily by absorbing intermediates or constituent
ions into them in the threshold-limited processes, as shown in eqs and 5. In our previous report, eq was an essential step to simulate the asymmetric microstructure
of a single band, and k2 is much smaller
than other reaction rate constants, which means that the aggregation
of intermediates is a rate-determining step and that the overall precipitation
patterns mainly result from eq .[21] In this work, the Liesegang
pattern varied by a function of PAA additives was successfully simulated
by applying a threshold concentration (α*) in eq and introducing a reversible step
describing the interaction between Ca2+ and PAA (eqs and 7) (Figure ). The
reaction rate constant of the formation of Ca2+-PAA complex
(k5) is increased as the PAA content increased.
The width of the precipitation bands decreased as the value of the
threshold concentration became higher (Figure b, c). In the excessive threshold condition,
the periodic pattern disappeared and only a continuous band was formed,
which is similar to the experimental result (Figure d).
Figure 5
Simulated Liesegang pattern at t = 10. Distribution
(right) and cross-sectional profile (left) of precipitates in the
hydrogel when the threshold in eq and reaction rate constant in eq are (a) α* = 0, k5 = 0, and k6 = 0, (b) α*
= 0.01, k5 = 102, and k6 = 103, (c) α* = 0.1, k5 = 103, and k6 = 103, and (d) α* = 1.0, k5 = 104, and k6 = 103. The following set of parameters was used: DA = DB = 0.1, DC = 0.01, c* = 0.05, p* = 2.0, Δx = 10–3 (grid spacing), and Δt = 5 × 10–7 (time step).
Simulated Liesegang pattern at t = 10. Distribution
(right) and cross-sectional profile (left) of precipitates in the
hydrogel when the threshold in eq and reaction rate constant in eq are (a) α* = 0, k5 = 0, and k6 = 0, (b) α*
= 0.01, k5 = 102, and k6 = 103, (c) α* = 0.1, k5 = 103, and k6 = 103, and (d) α* = 1.0, k5 = 104, and k6 = 103. The following set of parameters was used: DA = DB = 0.1, DC = 0.01, c* = 0.05, p* = 2.0, Δx = 10–3 (grid spacing), and Δt = 5 × 10–7 (time step).The detailed process of band formation was analyzed based on the
numerical simulations (Figure ). In a control simulation, asymmetric bands were formed as
mentioned in our previous work (Figure a).[21] Precipitation started
at the middle of the nth band while consuming neighboring
intermediates which subsequently decreased its concentration. Because
Ca2+ was incessantly supplied from its reservoir, the precipitate
was first formed in the region nearer to the reservoir than to the
central point, which resulted in the formation of the spike. Then,
the central point was covered with some precipitates, and the spire
began to develop because the intermediates only exist at the end of
the band. Because the concentration of the intermediates (green line)
decreased in the first band as a result of their aggregation and attachment
to the precipitate, the intermediates presented in front of a reaction
front are gathered by backward diffusion because of the concentration
gradient. Finally, more crystals were precipitated at the end of the
band, leading to the further development of the spire structure. The
depletion caused by the backward mass transport of intermediates resulted
in the void regions, in which the concentration of intermediates did
not exceed the critical threshold. In the presence of threshold in
the C + P step, the concentration of the intermediates could increase
beyond the threshold only at a specific position, which resulted in
precipitation in a narrow region (Figure b). It is noticeable that the band was abruptly
formed as soon as the concentration of intermediates exceeded the
threshold (Figure b, ii–iv). The simulation nicely matches with an experimental
result; the narrow band was quickly developed in the presence of 0.1
and 1 mg/mL PAA, while the wide band with an asymmetric microstructure
forms slowly in a control experiment (Figure a). The narrow band was grown by gathering
the intermediates in both sides of the band, but it is mostly attributed
to intermediates left behind the reaction front rather than those
in the front of the band.[47,48] The accumulated intermediates
in front of the band were used for the growth of the next band (Figure b, vi–viii).
This simulation result indicates that the narrow band was mainly developed
by the forward mass transport of the intermediates accumulated behind
the reaction front. In the case of high PAA concentration, the precipitation
reaction was strongly inhibited by an excessively high threshold (Figure c). Thus, a tiny
amount of precipitate was continuously and slowly deposited in the
whole region without producing local accumulation of intermediates
during the band formation.
Figure 6
Simulated concentration of A (Ca2+; blue line), B (HPO42–; black line),
C (intermediate; green
line), and P (precipitate; red line) when the threshold in eq is (a) α* = 0, k5 = 0, and k6 =
0, (b) α* = 0.1, k5 = 103, and k6 = 103, and (c) α*
= 1.0, k5 = 104, and k6 = 103. The band development as
a function of the dimensionless time at (a) (i) 1.1600, (ii) 1.1900,
(iii) 1.2100, (iv) 1.2400, (v) 1.4100, (vi) 1.4600, (vii) 1.4800,
(viii) 1.6300, (b) (i) 0.9300, (ii) 1.1400, (iii) 1.1494, (iv) 1.1534,
(v) 1.1800, (vi) 1.4200, (vii) 1.4300, (viii) 1.4600 and (c) (i) 1.0000,
(ii) 4.0000, (iii) 7.0000, (iv) 10.0000. The left y-axis (black) is the concentrations of A, B, and C, and the right y-axis (red) is that of P. The following set of parameters
was used: DA = DB = 0.1, DC = 0.01, c* = 0.05, p* = 2.0, Δx =
10–3 (grid spacing), and Δt = 5 × 10–7 (time step).
Simulated concentration of A (Ca2+; blue line), B (HPO42–; black line),
C (intermediate; green
line), and P (precipitate; red line) when the threshold in eq is (a) α* = 0, k5 = 0, and k6 =
0, (b) α* = 0.1, k5 = 103, and k6 = 103, and (c) α*
= 1.0, k5 = 104, and k6 = 103. The band development as
a function of the dimensionless time at (a) (i) 1.1600, (ii) 1.1900,
(iii) 1.2100, (iv) 1.2400, (v) 1.4100, (vi) 1.4600, (vii) 1.4800,
(viii) 1.6300, (b) (i) 0.9300, (ii) 1.1400, (iii) 1.1494, (iv) 1.1534,
(v) 1.1800, (vi) 1.4200, (vii) 1.4300, (viii) 1.4600 and (c) (i) 1.0000,
(ii) 4.0000, (iii) 7.0000, (iv) 10.0000. The left y-axis (black) is the concentrations of A, B, and C, and the right y-axis (red) is that of P. The following set of parameters
was used: DA = DB = 0.1, DC = 0.01, c* = 0.05, p* = 2.0, Δx =
10–3 (grid spacing), and Δt = 5 × 10–7 (time step).
Mechanisms
Based on the inhibition on the CaP precipitate
growth by PAA, the mechanism of each CaP band formation on different
PAA concentrations was proposed on a microscopic scale (Figure ). In our simulation, crystallization
occurred through formation (eq ), aggregation (eq ), and attachment (eq ) of the intermediate, as well as the attachment of ions (eq ). It should be noted that
the effect of PAA concentration on the pattern formation was successfully
simulated by applying a critical threshold in eq , which implies that the variation of the
patterns mainly resulted from retardation in the attachment of the
intermediate to the precipitate.[22,49] Therefore,
the addition of PAA changed the reactivity and stability of amorphous
intermediates, which finally resulted in a variation in precipitation
patterns. Previous studies have demonstrated that soluble organic
PAA containing COO– can stabilize the amorphous
precursors of CaP by sequestering calcium and phosphate ions, which
results in the delay of the crystal growth and precipitation.[34] In our system, the intermediates are interpreted
as amorphous precursors, and the concentration of PAA can modulate
the stability of the precursor, which is related to the critical threshold
shown in eq . Because
the factors for the inhibition of nucleation and crystal growth are
completely excluded in the control, the mineralization is readily
initiated at the relatively low level of supersaturation, leading
to the expansion of the nucleation region and formation of wide bands
(Figure a). As the
stability of the precursor decreased, the precipitate easily grow
by the particle attachment of intermediates (eq ), which resulted in a larger size of crystals
compared with those formed with PAA. The average size and crystallinity
of OCP in a control (in the absence of PAA) and a sample with 0.01
mg/mL PAA were also determined using full width at half maximum (FWHM)
of the 4.7° peak, the main peak of OCP. The FWHM value of the
control (0.011327 radian) was almost identical compared with that
of the 0.01 mg/mL PAA sample (0.010705 radian), which indicates that
the crystallinity of OCP was not altered by the presence of PAA. Furthermore,
the size of the crystallite was also calculated to be similar in control
(12.25 nm) and 0.01 mg/mL PAA conditions (12.96 nm) according to Scherrer’s
equation. In fact, the peak broadening in XRD is sensitive to the
single crystalline domain, and the result of calculation with Scherrer’s
equation was not the total size of aggregates but the size of the
individual single domain.[50] This suggests
that the final crystalline precipitates consist of several smaller
crystalline domains that have a similar size. Considering that the
growth of precipitates occurred mainly by the aggregation of intermediates
based on the simulation, aggregated precursors subsequently transformed
into crystalline precipitates that have similar crystallinity without
merging with each other. However, the aggregation of intermediates
is inhibited in the presence of PAA, which diminishes the total size
of final aggregates. Notably, the backward diffusion of the precursor
formed a spire and produced the depleted zone in the last stage of
band formation (Figure a).
Figure 7
Scheme of band formation with (a) no PAA (control), (b) low PAA
concentration, and (c) high PAA concentration.
Scheme of band formation with (a) no PAA (control), (b) low PAA
concentration, and (c) high PAA concentration.In the presence of PAA in a hydrogel, the PAA adsorbed on the surface
of ACP-blocked incoming constituent ions and increased the stability
of the precursors.[36,38] Thus, the level of threshold
should be increased for crystallization. In the presence of a low
PAA concentration, the concentration of precursors surpassed the crystallization
threshold only in the limited point at the center of the band (Figure b). As soon as the
nucleation started after a long period of incubation, stabilized precursors
were rapidly dragged to the nucleation point from both sides, which
resulted in narrow bands. Although the precursors were supplied from
both sides of the nucleation point, those left behind the nucleation
point were more contributed to the growth of the band through forward
diffusion. Because the overall crystallization was retarded by stabilizing
the precursors, the total size of the formed aggregated crystals was
reduced by mainly inhibiting the attachment of precursors on the surface
of the crystal, although the size of the single domain was maintained.
In addition, once the precursor transformed into the crystalline precipitate,
its crystallinity was not different from the precipitates formed without
PAA.In the presence of a great amount of PAA, the total density
of
precipitation is remarkably reduced because of an extremely elevated
threshold for crystal growth. As a result, the precipitation was continuously
formed in an extremely low density because there was no abrupt nucleation
which induced a depleted zone for periodic patterns (Figure c). Instead, tiny precipitates
were adsorbed on the hydrogel network.
Conclusions
In
this study, we demonstrated a bioinspired method to control
and engineer the precipitation pattern of Liesegang bands by adding
an organic polymer (PAA) that stabilized intermediates in the gelatin
hydrogel. In previous studies, PAA was successfully used in the synthesis
of amorphous calcium carbonate spheres and quantum dots[51,52] and crystallization control of barium sulfate.[53] In these studies, PAA affected the microscopic properties
of the formed crystals. However, here, we showed that PAA can affect
the macroscopic morphology of the pattern consisting of those small
crystals. The width of the formed band drastically decreased in the
presence of PAA. However, at high PAA concentrations, continuous precipitation
was observed. While ACP was commonly observed at the early mineralization
of CaP under all experimental conditions, OCP was the main crystalline
phase of CaP after 5 days of reaction in the control experiment, and
the addition of PAA favored the formation of ACP, which is considered
the precursor phase of OCP. It was found that the overall size of
precipitates was diminished as the concentration of PAA increased.
These results indicate that increasing the amount of PAA stabilizes
the transient ACP by retarding the transformation of ACP to OCP and
hinders the overall crystallization, including nucleation and growth.
To explain our experimental observation, we modified our previous
reaction–diffusion model by varying the threshold concentrations
in the attachment of intermediate processes. Based on simulation results,
we suggest that the amorphous precursor of CaP was stabilized by the
interaction between PAA and ACP that inhibited the growth and precipitation
of CaP. This stabilization effect of PAA on the precursor induces
different precipitation patterns depending on the PAA concentration.
Previously, we found that the crystallization was initialized from
the central part of the band because of the crossed initial concentration
gradient of Ca2+ and HPO42– in the one-dimensional (1D) diffusion system.[21] In the moderate PAA concentration system, the level of
supersaturation to surpass the threshold was increased by PAA. Thus,
nucleation can occur in the limited area near the center of the band,
resulting in a diminished bandwidth of the Liesegang band. Notably,
in the course of band formation, the spire was developed by the backward
diffusion of precursors, producing the depleted zone in a control,
but the growth of the narrow band resulted from the diffusion of the
precursor phase from both sides. At a high PAA concentration, because
the crystallization of CaP was highly suppressed, the local decrease
in the concentration of precursors was too small to induce backward
diffusion to form periodic patterns. Therefore, a continuous band
was formed in the high PAA experiment.