| Literature DB >> 35147892 |
Sarah Metzger1, Annette Weiser1, Nicolas U Gerber1, Maria Otth1,2, Katrin Scheinemann2,3,4, Niklaus Krayenbühl5, Michael A Grotzer1, Ana S Guerreiro Stucklin6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The challenges of treating central nervous system (CNS) tumors in young children are many. These include age-specific tumor characteristics, limited treatment options, and susceptibility of the developing CNS to cytotoxic therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term survival, health-related, and educational/occupational outcomes of this vulnerable patient population.Entities:
Keywords: Brain tumors; Educational/occupational outcomes; Long-term outcome; Pediatrics; Survival
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35147892 PMCID: PMC9021074 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-03963-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.506
Fig. 1Characteristics of Study Population. A Tumor subgroups in percentage of whole cohort. B Age distribution according to tumor type. C Location of tumors according to tumor type. D Progression free survival and overall survival of whole cohort with 95%-confidence intervals and corresponding risk table. Censored cases are depicted as crosses
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier Curves A–D depicting progression free survival and overall survival of the four main tumor subgroups with corresponding risk-tables. Censored cases are depicted as crosses
Health-related outcomes for each tumor subgroup
| LGG | HGG | Ependymoma | Medulloblastoma | Embryonal tumor | Germ cell tumor | Choroid plexus tumor | Other | Total n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 46 | 14 | 21 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 128 (100) |
| Age at diagnosis years (median [IQR]) | 2.32 [0.94, 3.41] | 2.34 [1.62, 3.54] | 1.68 [1.11, 2.68] | 2.90 [1.46, 3.35] | 1.53 [0.20, 2.22] | 0.02 [0.00, 0.30] | 0.39 [0.20, 0.66] | 2.05 [1.36, 3.17] | |
| Any abnormal neurological finding (%) | 26 (56.5) | 10 (71.4) | 12 (57.1) | 10 (71.4) | 6 (66.7) | 2 (50.0) | 6 (75.0) | 7 (58.3) | 79 (61.7) |
| Seizures (%) | 10 (21.7) | 3 (21.4) | 1 (4.8) | 4 (28.6) | 5 (55.6) | 1 (25.0) | 2 (25.0) | 2 (16.7) | 28 (21.9) |
| Neuroendocrine sequelae (%) | 10 (21.7) | 1 (7.1) | 6 (28.6) | 4 (28.6) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 3 (25.0) | 28 (21.9)* |
| Hearing outcome (%) | |||||||||
| Chang Grade 0 | 39 (84.8) | 12 (85.7) | 13 (61.9) | 10 (71.4) | 8 (88.9) | 3 (75.0) | 7 (87.5) | 12 (100.0) | 104 (81.2) |
| Chang Grade 1b | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (9.5) | 2 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (3.9) |
| Chang Grade 2a | 2 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.5) |
| Chang Grade 2b | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.3) |
| Chang Grade 3 | 1 (2.2) | 1 (7.1) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (3.9) |
| Chang Grade 4 | 1 (2.2) | 1 (7.1) | 5 (23.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (6.2) |
*Including 2 patients with transient endocrine alterations
Characteristics of patients with diagnosis of a secondary malignancy
| Age at diagnosis of first tumor (years) | Sex | Pathology primary tumor | Deceased | OS (years) | Surgery | Chemo | Radiation | Time from first diagnosis to second (years) | Type of secondary malignancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 | Male | Fibrillary astrocytoma | No | 16.9 | Yes, GTR | Yes | Yes, Photon | 9.2 | T-ALL |
| 1.5 | Female | ATRT | No | 12.2 | Yes, STR | Yes | Yes, Proton | 10.5 | Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (outside of radiation field) |
| 3.4 | Male | Classic medulloblastoma | Yes | 3.3 | Yes, GTR | Yes | Yes, Photon | 3.2 | High grade diffuse brainstem glioma |
Fig. 3Educational/occupational outcomes by age at last follow-up