Literature DB >> 35147814

Rapid diagnostic test (Leptocheck-WB) for detection of acute leptospirosis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Norah Htet Htet1, Wong Siew Tung1, Siau Ek Hwee1, Cho Naing2, Joon Wah Mak1.   

Abstract

The majority of leptospirosis is subclinical or mild self-limiting systemic illness. A rapid and accurate diagnostic test for the detection of leptospirosis is essential to prevent disease progression from acute non-severe illness to potentially fatal infection. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) recognized as point-of-care (PoC) tests may support clinical decision-making in resource-poor settings. We aimed to assess the accuracy of PoC (Leptocheck-WB) for the detection of acute leptospirosis by meta-analysis of data from eligible studies. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guideline. The pooling of data was done only when there were two or more studies that used a particular type of reference test. A total of ten studies (n = 5369) were identified. The majority (70%) were from the Asian region. Using microscopic agglutination test (MAT) as reference test, the pooled sensitivity (0.75, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.84, 10 studies, I2: 85.9%) and specificity (0.87, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.94, 10 studies, I2: 97.37%) of Leptocheck-WB in the detection of leptospirosis were moderate. With the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reference test, the pooled sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.9, 4 studies, I2: 27.49%) and specificity 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71 to 0.85, 4 studies, I2: 58.9%) of Leptocheck-WB were also moderate. Diagnostic odds ratio of Leptocheck-WB with MAT (21, 95% CI: 10-44) or with ELISA as reference test (21, 95% CI: 9-46) showed an acceptable level of accuracy. Meta-regression analysis showed methodological quality of studies (p: 0.06) and study design (p: 0.09) were potential factors that affected the accuracy of Leptocheck-WB test. Findings suggest that Leptocheck-WB has a moderate level of acceptance for detection of acute leptospirosis. Further confirmation with large-sampled, prospectively designed studies using the same samples for evaluating test accuracy is recommended.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leptocheck-WB; Leptospirosis; Meta-analysis; Test accuracy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35147814     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-022-04420-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  2 in total

1.  To evaluate the different rapid screening tests for diagnosis of leptospirosis.

Authors:  Tanvi Panwala; Sangeeta Rajdev; Summaiya Mulla
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  Leptospirosis diagnosis: competancy of various laboratory tests.

Authors:  Suman Veerappa Budihal; Khalid Perwez
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-06-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.