| Literature DB >> 35147200 |
Fadime Mutlu Icduygu1, Egemen Akgun2, Demet Sengul3, Asuman Ozgoz4, Ebru Alp2.
Abstract
Long non‑coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are molecules that are >200 base pairs long and do not encode a protein. However, they perform important roles in regulating gene expression. Recent studies have revealed that the changes in the expressions of lncRNAs serve a role in the development and metastases of a number of types of cancer. A number of studies have been published on the association of SOX2 overlapping transcript (SOX2OT), differentiation antagonizing non‑protein coding RNA (DANCR) and tissue differentiation‑induced non‑coding RNA (TINCR) expression with various types of cancer. However, researchers have not yet studied their roles in papillary thyroid cancer or at least, those roles are not clarified. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression and clinical significance of SOX2OT, DANCR and TINCR in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). A total of 102 patients with PTC were included in the present study. Reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR method was used to determine the relative gene expression levels of lncRNAs and then the relationship between expressions of lncRNAs and clinical characteristics of the subjects was analyzed in detail. Expression levels of SOX2OT (P=0.016) and DANCR (P=0.017) increased in the tumor samples in contrast to the normal tissues. No significant difference was observed in the expression level of TINCR (P=0.298). In addition, SOX2OT expression was associated with micro carcinoma (P<0.001), tumor size (P=0.010) and primary tumor (P=0.006), while DANCR expression was associated with age (P=0.030) and micro carcinoma (P=0.004). The findings of the present study indicated that DANCR may contribute to the development of PTC while SOX2OT may contribute to both the development and progression of PTC.Entities:
Keywords: SOX2 overlapping transcript; differentiation antagonizing non‑protein coding RNA; long non‑coding RNA; papillary thyroid cancer; reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR; tissue differentiation‑induced non‑coding RNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35147200 PMCID: PMC8855165 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
Figure 1.Expression of SOX2OT lncRNA in tumor and normal tissue. (A) The comparisons of lncRNA SOX2OT relative expression levels between normal and tumor tissues of the total patient group (n=102). (B) The comparisons of lncRNA SOX2OT relative expression levels between normal and tumor tissues of patients whose tumor size was >1 cm (n=66). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. lnc, long non-coding.
Figure 2.Expression of DANCR lncRNA in tumor and normal tissue. (A) The comparisons of lncRNA DANCR relative expression levels between normal and tumor tissues of the total patient group (n=102). (B) The comparisons of lncRNA DANCR relative expression levels between normal and tumor tissues of patients whose tumor size is larger than 1 cm (n=66). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the statistics. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. lnc, long non-coding.
Figure 3.Expression of TINCR lncRNA in tumor and normal tissue. (A) The comparisons of lncRNA TINCR relative expression levels between normal and tumor tissues of the total patient group (n=102). (B) The comparisons of lncRNA TINCR relative expression levels between normal and tumor tissues of patients whose tumor size larger is than 1 cm (n=66). All of the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. lnc, long non-coding.
Association between expression level of SOX2OT and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with PTC. Low/high decided by the median expression of SOX2OT. Chi square test was used for statistical analysis.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Number of patients | Low | High | P-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Age, years | 0.759 | 1.143 (0.490-2.680) | |||
| <45 | 30 | 16 | 14 | ||
| ≥45 | 72 | 36 | 36 | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 81 | 42 | 39 | 0.730 | 1.185 (0.450-3.100) |
| Male | 21 | 10 | 11 | ||
| Microcarcinoma | <0.001[ | 0.203 (0.080-0.500) | |||
| No | 66 | 25 | 41 | ||
| Yes | 36 | 27 | 9 | ||
| Histological type | 0.129 | ||||
| Classical PTC | 17 | 1 | 10 | ||
| Follicular PTC | 62 | 31 | 31 | ||
| Classical-Follicular PTC | 5 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Unknown | 18 | 13 | 5 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.010[ | 2.940 (1.290-6.720) | |||
| <2 | 62 | 38 | 24 | ||
| ≥2 | 40 | 14 | 26 | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.391 | 1.551 (0.570-4.250) | |||
| No | 83 | 44 | 39 | ||
| Yes | 19 | 8 | 11 | ||
| Primary tumor | 0.006[ | ||||
| T1 | 78 | 46 | 32 | ||
| T2 | 20 | 6 | 14 | ||
| T3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | ||
| TNM stage | 0.114 | 0.475 (0.390-0.580) | |||
| I | 99 | 52 | 47 | ||
| II | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.000 | 0.510 (0.050-5.810) | |||
| No | 50 | 49 | |||
| Yes | 2 | 1 | |||
| Extrathyroidal extension | 0.488 | 0.489 (0.120-2.070) | |||
| No | 93 | 46 | 47 | ||
| Yes | 9 | 6 | 3 | ||
| Multicentricity | 0.238 | 1.629 (0.720-3.68) | |||
| No | 65 | 36 | 29 | ||
| Yes | 37 | 16 | 21 | ||
| Multifocality | 0.712 | 1.160 (0.530-2.550) | |||
| No | 31 | 28 | |||
| Yes | 21 | 22 | |||
P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. PTC, papillary thyroid cancer.
Association between expression level of DANCR and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with PTC. Low/high decided by the median expression of DANCR. Chi square test was used for statistical analysis.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Number of patients | Low | High | P-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Age | 0.030[ | 2.645 (1.090-6.450) | |||
| <45 | 30 | 20 | 10 | ||
| ≥45 | 72 | 31 | 41 | ||
| Sex | 0.221 | 1.839 (0.690-4.910) | |||
| Female | 81 | 43 | 38 | ||
| Male | 21 | 8 | 13 | ||
| Microcarcinoma | 0.004[ | 0.286 (0.120-0.680) | |||
| No | 66 | 26 | 40 | ||
| Yes | 36 | 25 | 11 | ||
| Histological type | 0.562 | ||||
| Classical PTC | 17 | 10 | 7 | ||
| Follicular PTC | 62 | 31 | 31 | ||
| Classical-Follicular PTC | 5 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Unknown | 18 | 9 | 9 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.685 | 1.179 (0.530-2.610) | |||
| <2 | 62 | 32 | 30 | ||
| ≥2 | 40 | 19 | 21 | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.799 | 1.138 (0.420-3.090) | |||
| No | 83 | 42 | 41 | ||
| Yes | 19 | 9 | 10 | ||
| Primary tumor | 0.693 | ||||
| T1 | 78 | 41 | 37 | ||
| T2 | 20 | 8 | 12 | ||
| T3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||
| TNM stage | 1.000 | 2.041 (0.180-23.240) | |||
| I | 99 | 50 | 49 | ||
| II | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.000 | 2.041 (0.180-23.240) | |||
| No | 99 | 50 | 49 | ||
| Yes | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Extrathyroidal extension | 0.487 | 0.469 (0.110-1.990) | |||
| No | 93 | 45 | 48 | ||
| Yes | 9 | 6 | 3 | ||
| Multicentricity | 0.837 | 0.919 (0.410-2.060) | |||
| No | 65 | 32 | 33 | ||
| Yes | 37 | 19 | 18 | ||
| Multifocality | 0.160 | 0.567 (0.260-1.270) | |||
| No | 59 | 26 | 33 | ||
| Yes | 43 | 25 | 18 | ||
P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. PTC, papillary thyroid cancer.
Association between expression level of TINCR and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with PTC. Low/high decided by the median expression of TINCR. Chi square test was used for statistical analysis.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Number of patients | Low | High | P-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| Age, years | 0.385 | 1.462 (0.620-3.450) | |||
| <45 | 30 | 17 | 13 | ||
| ≥45 | 72 | 34 | 38 | ||
| Sex | 0.807 | 0.887 (0.340-2.320) | |||
| Female | 81 | 40 | 41 | ||
| Male | 21 | 11 | 10 | ||
| Microcarcinoma | 0.214 | 0.595 (0.260-1.350) | |||
| No | 66 | 30 | 36 | ||
| Yes | 36 | 21 | 15 | ||
| Histological type | 0.148 | ||||
| Classical PTC | 17 | 5 | 12 | ||
| Follicular PTC | 62 | 31 | 31 | ||
| Classical-Follicular PTC | 5 | 4 | 1 | ||
| Unknown | 18 | 11 | 7 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.417 | 0.719 (0.320-1.600) | |||
| <2 | 62 | 29 | 33 | ||
| ≥2 | 40 | 22 | 18 | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.075 | 2.566 (0.890-7.400) | |||
| No | 83 | 45 | 38 | ||
| Yes | 19 | 6 | 13 | ||
| Primary tumor | 0.029[ | ||||
| T1 | 78 | 35 | 43 | ||
| T2 | 20 | 15 | 5 | ||
| T3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | ||
| TNM stage | 1.000 | 2.041 (0.180-23.240) | |||
| I | 99 | 49 | 50 | ||
| II | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.000 | 2.041 (0.180-23.240) | |||
| No | 50 | 49 | |||
| Yes | 1 | 2 | |||
| Extrathyroidal extension | 0.160 | 3.900 (0.770-19.760) | |||
| No | 93 | 49 | 44 | ||
| Yes | 9 | 2 | 7 | ||
| Multicentricity | 0.837 | 0.919 (0.410-2.060) | |||
| No | 65 | 32 | 33 | ||
| Yes | 37 | 19 | 18 | ||
| Multifocality | 0.547 | 0.785 (0.360-1.730) | |||
| No | 59 | 28 | 31 | ||
| Yes | 43 | 23 | 20 | ||
P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. PTC, papillary thyroid cancer.