Brooke T Nezami1, Lex Hurley2, Julianne Power2, Carmina G Valle1,3, Deborah F Tate1,2,3. 1. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the efficacy of a lower-burden, simplified dietary self-monitoring approach compared with a standard calorie monitoring approach for self-monitoring adherence and weight loss in a mobile-delivered behavioral weight loss intervention. METHODS: Participants (n = 72) with overweight or obesity who had children 2 to 12 years of age living in the home were randomly assigned to a group that used simplified dietary self-monitoring of high-calorie foods (Simplified) or a group that tracked calories (Standard). Both groups received a wireless scale, Fitbit trackers, and a 6-month intervention delivered via a smartphone application with lessons, text messages, and weekly personalized feedback messages. RESULTS: Percentage weight loss at 6 months was 5.7% (95% CI: -8.3% to -3.2%) in the Standard group and 4.0% (95% CI: -5.7% to -2.3%) in the Simplified group, which was not significantly different. Similar proportions reached 5% weight loss at 6 months (43.2% in Standard and 42.9% in Simplified). There were no differences in number of dietary tracking days or change in average daily caloric intake between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Two mobile-delivered weight loss interventions produced clinically meaningful levels of weight loss at 6 months, with no differences in dietary tracking adherence or dietary intake. The results suggest that simplified monitoring of high-calorie foods could be a promising alternative to calorie monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the efficacy of a lower-burden, simplified dietary self-monitoring approach compared with a standard calorie monitoring approach for self-monitoring adherence and weight loss in a mobile-delivered behavioral weight loss intervention. METHODS: Participants (n = 72) with overweight or obesity who had children 2 to 12 years of age living in the home were randomly assigned to a group that used simplified dietary self-monitoring of high-calorie foods (Simplified) or a group that tracked calories (Standard). Both groups received a wireless scale, Fitbit trackers, and a 6-month intervention delivered via a smartphone application with lessons, text messages, and weekly personalized feedback messages. RESULTS: Percentage weight loss at 6 months was 5.7% (95% CI: -8.3% to -3.2%) in the Standard group and 4.0% (95% CI: -5.7% to -2.3%) in the Simplified group, which was not significantly different. Similar proportions reached 5% weight loss at 6 months (43.2% in Standard and 42.9% in Simplified). There were no differences in number of dietary tracking days or change in average daily caloric intake between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Two mobile-delivered weight loss interventions produced clinically meaningful levels of weight loss at 6 months, with no differences in dietary tracking adherence or dietary intake. The results suggest that simplified monitoring of high-calorie foods could be a promising alternative to calorie monitoring.
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John M Jakicic; Deborah F Tate; Wei Lang; Kelli K Davis; Kristen Polzien; Amy D Rickman; Karen Erickson; Rebecca H Neiberg; Eric A Finkelstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lora E Burke; Molly B Conroy; Susan M Sereika; Okan U Elci; Mindi A Styn; Sushama D Acharya; Mary A Sevick; Linda J Ewing; Karen Glanz Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jing Wang; Susan M Sereika; Eileen R Chasens; Linda J Ewing; Judith T Matthews; Lora E Burke Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Sara Wilcox; Alycia Boutté; Brent E Hutto; Camelia Singletary; Eric R Muth; Adam W Hoover Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-06-10 Impact factor: 5.002