Literature DB >> 35146284

Emerging challenges in evidence-based public health and how to address them.

Mark Petticrew1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 35146284      PMCID: PMC8734145          DOI: 10.25646/6500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Monit        ISSN: 2511-2708


× No keyword cloud information.
Public health has been defined as ‘the process of mobilizing and engaging local, state, national, and international resources to assure the conditions in which people can be healthy’ [1]. ‘Evidence-based public health’ aims to put scientific evidence at the core of this process, integrating it into public health decision-making, alongside other evidence and expertise [2]. This is of course challenging. One reason is that public health evidence derives from many sources, collected using a wide range of scientific methods. That evidence is often difficult to produce, and generalise from. This can make primary research (e.g. evaluations), and secondary research (e.g. systematic reviews), difficult and costly. Straightforward epidemiological concepts – even apparently simple ones like ‘population,’ ‘intervention’ and ‘outcome’ – can also be more difficult to define in public health contexts [3]. Overall, then, this has been one of the greatest challenges facing public health: how to develop and use meaningful actionable evidence. In the face of such complexity, researchers often retreat into using simpler approaches. However simplistic models of evidence and evaluation are often misleading, and can even be harmful. In contrast, conceptualising interventions as changes in complex systems (rather than as discrete, bounded events) can help with the development and implementation of public health interventions. Systems-based approaches require that we think about public health evidence and public health methods quite differently. This can be a challenge in itself – but such systems-based approaches offer great promise [4]. Not least, they can help us to think about how to implement evidence across very different contexts. This is of practical importance because many non-communicable diseases (NCDs, and their related inequalities) arise from systems. Such systems include markets for unhealthy commodities – such as tobacco, alcohol, unhealthy food, gambling and many others. For example it has been argued that if we want to understand why people are consuming more unhealthy foods – a major public health challenge in low and middle income countries, as well as in better-off countries – we need to study the transformations to economic and social systems that are favouring their increasing availability and affordability [5]. This presentation will aim to describe how applying a complex systems lens to public health can help address major public health problems (like NCDs), but can also help us create more useful, actionable evidence. It will use examples from tobacco, alcohol, and food, among others [6, 7].
  6 in total

1.  The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health.

Authors:  Harry Rutter; Natalie Savona; Ketevan Glonti; Jo Bibby; Steven Cummins; Diane T Finegood; Felix Greaves; Laura Harper; Penelope Hawe; Laurence Moore; Mark Petticrew; Eva Rehfuess; Alan Shiell; James Thomas; Martin White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  [Same words, different meanings: How epidemiological terminology struggles with population health intervention research].

Authors:  M Petticrew; S Viehbeck; S Cummins; T Lang
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.019

3.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

Review 4.  Alcohol advertising and public health: systems perspectives versus narrow perspectives.

Authors:  M Petticrew; I Shemilt; T Lorenc; T M Marteau; G J Melendez-Torres; A O'Mara-Eves; K Stautz; J Thomas
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco.

Authors:  David Stuckler; Martin McKee; Shah Ebrahim; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  'Nothing can be done until everything is done': the use of complexity arguments by food, beverage, alcohol and gambling industries.

Authors:  Mark Petticrew; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Cécile Knai; Rebecca Cassidy; Nason Maani Hessari; James Thomas; Heide Weishaar
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.710

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.