| Literature DB >> 35146180 |
Junichiro Kimura1, Hayami Kudo2, Akira Fukuda1, Michi Yamada3, Kohei Makita4, Kentaro Oka2, Motomichi Takahashi2, Yutaka Tamura1, Masaru Usui1.
Abstract
Tetracyclines (TCs) are widely used for livestock, and the high prevalence of TC-resistant Escherichia coli in livestock has become a serious concern worldwide. In Japan, the National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in 2016 aimed to reduce the TC resistance rate in E. coli derived from livestock. Flavophospholipol (FPL), used as a feed additive, has an inhibitory effect on the spread of plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance. The number of TC-resistant E. coli was determined in pigs administered TCs and/or FPL to clarify the effect of FPL on reducing the number of TC-resistant E. coli in pigs. TC-resistant E. coli and their plasmids were then analyzed. The pigs were divided into four groups: control, doxycycline (DOXY; a TC), FPL, and a DOXY-FPL combination. Their feces were collected from the nursing period to the day before being transported to the slaughterhouse, followed by estimation of TC-resistant E. coli (colony-forming units [CFU]/g). The number of TC-resistant E. coli increased with the use of DOXY, suggesting that DOXY administration provides a selective pressure for TC-resistant E. coli. Supplementation with FPL as a feed additive significantly suppressed the increase in the number of TC-resistant E. coli, especially during the DOXY administration period. Transfer and growth inhibition analyses were performed for TC-resistant isolates. FPL inhibited the conjugational transfer and growth of a few TC-resistant E. coli isolates. These results suggest that FPL is effective against the spread of TC-resistant E. coli.Entities:
Keywords: Conjugational transfer; Escherichia coli; Flavophospholipol; Pig; Tetracycline resistance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35146180 PMCID: PMC8818586 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2022.100236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Anim Sci ISSN: 2451-943X
tet gene prevalence and replicon types of 41 tetracycline (TC)-resistant E. coli.
| Inc | ||
|---|---|---|
| FIB | 100% (30) | 100% (11) |
| Frep | 100% (30) | 54.5% (6) |
| FIA | 36.7% (11) | 9.1% (1) |
| B/O | 6.7% (2) | 72.7% (8) |
| Y | 0% (0) | 72.8% (8) |
| P | 20.0% (6) | 0% (0) |
Forty-one TC-resistant E. coli strains were randomly selected from each tested group (11, 10, 10, and 10 from the Control, DOXY, FPL, and DOXY-FPL groups, respectively). Thirty tetA-positive (10, 9, 6, and 5 from the Control, DOXY, FPL, and DOXY-FPL groups, respectively) and 11 tetB-positive (1, 1, 4, and 5 from the Control, DOXY, FPL, and DOXY-FPL groups, respectively) E. coli strains were selected.
Three representative tetracycline (TC)-resistant strains and the tetracycline resistance plasmids harbored.
| Strain Name | Plasmid name | Plasmid size (kbp) | Replicon type | Antimicrobial resistance genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I66 | pI66 | 103.5 | FIB | |
| P63 | pP63 | 170 | FIA | |
| K38 | pK38 | 110 | B/O/K/Z |
Fig. 1(A): Number of tetracycline (TC)-resistant E. coli detected in the fecal samples of pigs (n = 5) from D55 to D150. In the doxycycline (DOXY) and DOXY with flavophospholipol (FPL) groups, the pigs were administered DOXY from D61 to D67. In the FPL and DOXY with FPL groups, the pigs were fed FPL from D36 to 121. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test compared with the abundance of TC-resistant E. coli on D55 within the group (*p < 0.05). (B): Comparison of the abundance of TC-resistant E. coli among the four groups during the DOXY administration period (D64). Statistical analyses were performed using Tukey's test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Fig. 2Transfer frequency of three tetracycline (TC)-resistant E. coli in the presence of flavophospholipol (FPL). (A) Donor: I66 (tetA, IncFIB). (B) Donor: P63 (tetA, IncFIA). (C) Donor: K38 (tetB, IncB/O/K/Z).
Fig. 3Growth-inhibitory effect of flavophospholipol (FPL) on transconjugants compared with no exposure to FPL. The vertical axis indicates the number of bacteria (CFU/mL), and the horizontal axis indicates the FPL concentration (μg/mL). All data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using Dunnett test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).