| Literature DB >> 35146078 |
Bhedita J Seewoo1,2,3, Eng Guan Chua4, Yasmin Arena-Foster1,2, Lauren A Hennessy1,2, Anastazja M Gorecki1,2, Ryan Anderton5, Jennifer Rodger1,2.
Abstract
Gut microbiome composition is associated with mood-relating behaviours, including those reflecting depression-like phenotypes. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, is an effective treatment for depression, but its effects on the gut microbiome remain largely unknown. This study assessed microbial changes from rat faecal samples longitudinally following chronic restraint stress (CRS) and 10 Hz low-intensity rTMS treatment. CRS increased abundance within the Proteobacteria (Deltaproteobacteria, Desulfovibrionales) and Firmicutes (Anaerostipes, Frinsingococcus), with decreases in Firmicutes family (Acidaminococcaceae) and genera (Roseburia, Phascolarctobacterium and Fusicatenibacter) persisting for up to 4 weeks post CRS. The decrease in Firmicutes was not observed in the handling control and LI-rTMS groups, suggesting that handling alone may have sustained changes in gut microbiome associated with CRS. Nonetheless, LI-rTMS was specifically associated with an increase in Roseburia genus that developed 2 weeks after treatment, and the abundance of both Roseburia and Fusicatenibacter genera was significantly correlated with rTMS behavioural and MRI outcomes. In addition, LI-rTMS treated rats had a reduction in apoptosis pathways and several indicators of reduced inflammatory processes. These findings provide evidence that the brain can influence the gut microbiome in a "top-down" manner, presumably via stimulation of descending pathways, and/or indirectly via behavioural modification.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Chronic restraint stress; Depression; Microbiome; rTMS
Year: 2022 PMID: 35146078 PMCID: PMC8819474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Stress ISSN: 2352-2895
Fig. 1Experimental timeline. The research design consisted of an initial one-week period of habituation upon arrival of the animal. Rats then underwent chronic restraint stress for 2.5 h daily for 13 consecutive days. Animals were randomly allocated to 3 groups: active animals received 10 min of 10 Hz LI-rTMS three times daily (1 h apart, five days a week for two weeks), sham animals received a sham version of the stimulation protocol and depression control animals received no stimulation or extra handling. Faecal samples were collected at baseline (before the start of CRS), after the end of the 13 days of CRS (Post-CRS), after the end of the treatment period (Post-rTMS) and two weeks after the end of the treatment period (Follow-up).
Fig. 2Effect of chronic restraint stress on abundance of Deltaproteobacteria class (a), and its corresponding Desulfovibrionales order (b), and The figure shows boxplots of centered log-ratio transformed taxa abundances for taxa identified as significant in the ANCOM's W-statistic (threshold of 0.7). Between-timepoint comparisons were made by Wilcoxon signed rank test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 3Changes in abundance of taxa between timepoints within the active, sham and depression control groups. The figure shows boxplots of centered log-ratio transformed taxa abundances for taxa identified as significant in the ANCOM's W-statistic (threshold of 0.7). Quade test was used to determine if there was a significant effect of timepoint (post-CRS, post-rTMS and follow-up) in each group. Between-timepoint comparisons were made by Post hoc Wilcoxon signed rank test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction. †p < 0.1; *p < 0.05.
Summary of changes in abundance for KEGG functional pathways following chronic restraint stress (CRS) and between timepoints within the active, sham and depression control groups. Active animals received 10 min of 10 Hz LI-rTMS three times daily (1 h apart, five days a week for two weeks), sham animals received a sham version of the stimulation protocol with the coil turned off and control animals received no stimulation or extra handling.
| KEGG | Functional pathway | Group | Quade test | Timepoint comparison | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apoptosis | Active | F(2,22) = 8.272, p = 0.002 | Post-CRS vs Post-rTMS pFDR = 0.031 | Post-CRS = −2.71 ± 0.53 | |
| Sham | F(2,22) = 7.286, p = 0.003 | Post-CRS vs Follow-up pFDR = 0.078 | Post-CRS = −3.25 ± 0.96 | ||
| Caprolactam degradation | Sham | F(2,22) = 5.016, p = 0.016 | Post-CRS vs Post-rTMS pFDR = 0.007 | Post-CRS = −5.00 ± 0.67 | |
| beta-Lactam resistance | Sham | F(2,22) = 6.790, p = 0.005 | Post-CRS vs Follow-up pFDR = 0.031 | Post-CRS = 1.85 ± 0.42 | |
| Non-homologous end-joining | Control | F(2,12) = 7.455, p = 0.008 | Post-CRS vs Post-rTMS pFDR = 0.070 | Post-CRS = −2.94 ± 1.35 | |
| Flavonoid biosynthesis | Control | F(2,12) = 5.243, p = 0.023 | Post-CRS vs Post-rTMS pFDR = 0.070 | Post-CRS = −4.37 ± 1.77 | |
| Shigellosis | Control | F(2,12) = 17.71, p < 0.001 | Post-CRS vs Post-rTMS pFDR = 0.023 | Post-CRS = −7.58 ± 0.41 |
Fig. 4Changes in KEGG pathways between timepoints within the active, sham and depression control groups. The figure shows boxplots of centered log-ratio transformed KEGG pathway abundances for pathways identified as significant in the ANCOM's W-statistic (threshold of 0.7). Quade test was used to determine if there was a significant effect of timepoint (post-CRS, post-rTMS and follow-up) in each group. Between-timepoint comparisons were made by Post hoc Wilcoxon signed rank test with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction. †p < 0.1; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig. 5Correlations between microbiome data and MRI and behavioural measures. Centered log-ratio transformed abundances of taxa and KEGG pathways for taxa and pathways identified as significant in the ANCOM's W-statistic (threshold of 0.7) were correlated to the following parameters by Spearman correlations: GABA/tCr and Glutamate/tCr ratios from 1H-MRS data; hippocampal volume; connectivity (average z-scores) of the cingulate cortex, interoceptive network, salience network and default mode network from the rs-fMRI data; number of exits from the open arms from elevated plus maze data; and time spent immobile (Immobility) and swimming, and latency time to exhibit first immobility behaviour from forced swim test data. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (no multiple comparison correction).