Literature DB >> 35145645

Early and late acute kidney injury: temporal profile in the critically ill pediatric patient.

Amanda Ruth1, Rajit K Basu2, Scott Gillespie3, Catherine Morgan4, Joshua Zaritsky5, David T Selewski6, Ayse Akcan Arikan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing AKI diagnosis precision to refine the understanding of associated epidemiology and outcomes is a focus of recent critical care nephrology research. Timing of onset of acute kidney injury (AKI) during pediatric critical illness and impact on outcomes has not been fully explored.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Angina and Epidemiology (AWARE) database. AKI was defined as per Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Early AKI was defined as diagnosed at ≤48 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, with any diagnosis >48 h denoted as late AKI. Transient AKI was defined as return to baseline serum creatinine ≤48 h of onset, and those without recovery fell into the persistent category. A second incidence of AKI ≥48 h after recovery was denoted as recurrent. Patients were subsequently sorted into distinct phenotypes as early-transient, late-transient, early-persistent, late-persistent and recurrent. Primary outcome was major adverse kidney events (MAKE) at 28 days (MAKE28) or at study exit, with secondary outcomes including AKI-free days, ICU length of stay and inpatient renal replacement therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 1262 patients had AKI and were included. Overall mortality rate was 6.4% (n = 81), with 34.2% (n = 432) fulfilling at least one MAKE28 criteria. The majority of patients fell in the early-transient cohort (n = 704, 55.8%). The early-persistent phenotype had the highest odds of MAKE28 (odds ratio 7.84, 95% confidence interval 5.45-11.3), and the highest mortality rate (18.8%). Oncologic and nephrologic/urologic comorbidities at AKI diagnosis were associated with MAKE28.
CONCLUSION: Temporal nature and trajectory of AKI during a critical care course are significantly associated with patient outcomes, with several subtypes at higher risk for poorer outcomes. Stratification of pediatric critical care-associated AKI into distinct phenotypes is possible and may become an important prognostic tool.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute kidney injury; outcome; pediatric critical care; prognostication; renal recovery

Year:  2021        PMID: 35145645      PMCID: PMC8825224          DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Kidney J        ISSN: 2048-8505


INTRODUCTION

Evidence has demonstrated the association of acute kidney injury (AKI) with higher morbidity and mortality in both hospitalized and critically ill populations [1, 2], but has largely focused on peak injury. Epidemiological studies have shown that AKI is common in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), with prevalence ranging from 10% to 82% [3-6]. This foundational work has been limited in exploring the components covered under the umbrella of AKI, making our understanding of AKI phenotypes incomplete, particularly in terms of temporal course and trajectory. Breakdown of MAKE28 by phenotype. Cumulative incidence of 28-day discharge while accounting for death as a competing risk by AKI group. To optimize efforts to prevent AKI occurrence and modify the disease course, we need to understand whether different phenotypes of AKI exist and study associated risk factors to explore intervention opportunities. Much of our knowledge on pediatric AKI has been derived from the somewhat artificial construct of ‘AKI peak’. As timeline has been poorly characterized, it is as yet unknown whether AKI that develops after 48 h represents a different phenotype than that diagnosed within 48 h of ICU admission, paralleling the worse morbidity and mortality of progressive or sequential multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [7], and how AKI trajectory during an ICU stay may impact outcome. We present a secondary analysis of the AWARE (Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Angina and Epidemiology) cohort to investigate the temporal phenotypes of AKI based on the time course of AKI evolution. The landmark paper from the AWARE database evaluated 4683 patients and found AKI in 26.9% of patients (11.6% severe AKI) [5]. The aim of our study is to understand the epidemiology, and the impact of the timing of AKI onset (early/late) and AKI course (transient/persistent) might have on different outcome implications, specifically mortality and discharge renal function. We hypothesized that timing of onset, rapid reversibility and progression of AKI will have distinct clinical courses and impact on major adverse kidney event (MAKE) outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AWARE study was a prospective, observational study that recruited patients from 32 international PICUs as previously described [4]. All patients aged between 3 months and 25 years with a predicted ICU stay of at least 48 h were eligible. Data were collected daily for the first 8 days of ICU admission (Day 0 to Day 7), with an additional outcome assessment point at Day 28 or study exit, whichever came first. If patients were discharged prior to Day 28, the data point closest to 28 days was captured. Baseline serum creatinine (SCr) recorded was the lowest within 3 months prior to ICU admission if available. Those without a baseline SCr had it imputed to an estimated creatinine clearance of 120 mL/min/1.73 m2, as previously validated [5, 8]. Outcomes were censored on Day 28 or study exit, whichever came first. For this analysis, all patients in the AWARE database who met Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI criteria on ICU Day 0 up to ICU Day 6 either by SCr or urine output (UOP) were included.

Definition of AKI phenotype

Early AKI was defined as AKI at ≤48 h of ICU admission. Any AKI occurring after 48 h was termed late AKI. Patients who no longer fulfilled either AKI diagnostic criterion within 48 h of diagnosis and with no further AKI episodes during their admission were categorized as transient AKI. Those who still fulfilled KDIGO criteria beyond 48 h or died were considered to have persistent AKI. Another AKI phenotype was defined as recurrent phenotype. Patients were categorized as such if they developed two distinct AKI events during study period. These patients recovered (no longer defined as AKI by KDIGO criteria) after their initial diagnosis but developed a second AKI episode at least 48 h after recovery. The cumulative number of days with AKI was computed for all the subgroups. The different phenotypes of AKI were further analyzed in groups as such: early-transient, early-persistent, late-transient, late-persistent and recurrent.

Outcomes definitions

The primary outcome was MAKE at study exit. MAKE was modeled after MAKE30, which is a composite score of persistent renal dysfunction (meeting any KDIGO AKI criteria at last datapoint available), in-hospital mortality and new renal replacement therapy (RRT). However, as AWARE data collection stopped at 28 days, we computed MAKE at either 28 days or study exit (MAKE28). Secondary outcomes include AKI-free days, mechanical ventilation free (MV-free) days, 28-day ICU discharge, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and receipt of RRT. Severity of illness (SOI) scores such as the Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 (PIM-2), Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score (PRISM) and PELOD (Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction) score were collected when available. Patients were flagged as having a high SOI score if any score was >75th percentile for the relevant score. As a surrogate of severity of illness at the point of AKI diagnosis, the use of inotropic support was collected. Percent fluid overload (%FO) was calculated as previously described [9] and median cumulative value of %FO reported at the time of AKI diagnosis. With regard to use of nephrotoxic agents, we analyzed receipt of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other nephrotoxins (specifically vancomycin, aminoglycosides, amphotericin administration and radiocontrast exposure) administered in the ICU pre-AKI diagnosis.

Missing data

A proportion of our patients qualified solely on KDIGO UOP criterion (n = 443, 35.1%) with no available SCr. As these patients could not be evaluated for renal recovery based on the SCr criterion of KDIGO, they were conservatively adjudicated as ‘renal recovery’ in analyses. A further 23 patients had no follow-up SCr values after their initial, hence the number of patients adjudicated to renal recovery totaled 466. It was decided a priori to conduct a sensitivity analysis for this cohort who qualified via the UOP criterion only, as they potentially represent a distinct subpopulation.

Statistical analysis

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were summarized overall and by AKI phenotype combinations (early-transient, early-persistent, late-transient, late-persistent and recurrent) using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for discrete characteristics. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression considered the odds of MAKE28 by groups of AKI phenotypes, unadjusted and adjusted for patient covariates. Age at ICU admission, gender, need for mechanical ventilation and inotropic support use were included as adjustors in the multivariable model, irrespective of statistical significance. Additional covariates were added using backward selection and retained if the corresponding P-values were <0.05. Results are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using early-transient as reference. Incidence of any of the following: (i) mortality, (ii) need for RRT at discharge or (iii) failure of renal recovery at 28 days, constituted a MAKE28 event. For all analyses, missing data for mortality and need for RRT at discharge were assumed ‘no’ (thus all patients had MAKE adjudicated). For failure of renal recovery at study exit or 28 days, missing data were practically treated as ‘no’ for MAKE28 but removed from the denominator for descriptive reporting and hypothesis testing. For the secondary outcome time until 28-day ICU discharge, competing risks analysis was performed to model the probability over time for two mutually exclusive endpoints: ICU discharge and mortality; the remaining patients were alive without ICU discharge. As with the primary aim, models principally considered the association with AKI phenotypes and assessed the relationship unadjusted and adjusted for patient covariates. Results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI using early-transient as reference. Results from these analyses are visually plotted using cumulative incidence curves. AKI phenotype differences between cumulative incidence curves for each endpoint were tested using Gray's tests, with pairwise analyses adjusted for multiple comparisons using Holm's procedure. For each outcome analysis, SOI scores were considered as bivariable predictors by pooling across the PRISM-III, PIM-2 and PELOD measures, and calculating an overall indicator variable. Since SOI scores were only available in 42.2% (532/1262) of the sample, these metrics were not included in the primary multivariable analysis due to listwise deletion. All analyses were performed in SAS v.9.4 (Cary, NC, USA) and CRAN R v.4.0 (Vienna, Austria), and statistical significance was assessed at the 0.05 level.

RESULTS

Demographics and population breakdown

Overall, 1262 patients met our inclusion criteria. The majority had early transient AKI (n = 704, 55.8%), with late persistent AKI comprising the smallest group (n = 34, 2.7%) (Figure 1). The most common primary diagnosis was respiratory, followed by shock. Mortality was 6.4% (n = 81) in the cohort, with 34.2% (n = 432) fulfilling at least one criterion in the MAKE28. While a significant portion of the cohort required mechanical ventilation (39.4%, n = 497), only a small number required RRT during ICU stay (5%, n = 63). The median cumulative AKI days of the cohort was 1 day (IQR 1–3).
Figure 1:

Breakdown of MAKE28 by phenotype.

Median %FO at AKI diagnosis was 3.6% (IQR 1–7.5%), and this was highest in the late-persistent phenotype (9.1%, IQR 4.9–13.9%) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Demographics and characteristics of AKI phenotypes

Characteristics, n (%)Overall, n = 1262Early-transient, n = 704 (55.8%)Early-persistent, n = 325 (25.8%)Late-transient, n = 134 (10.6%)Late-persistent, n = 34 (2.7%)Recurrent, n = 65 (5.2%)P-value (ES)
Age, years6 (1.3, 13.6)6.9 (1.5, 14)4.8 (1, 13.6)4.9 (1.4, 12.4)4.2 (1.9, 12.5)4.3 (0.7, 12.9)0.143 (0.130)
Male gender700 (55.5)395 (56.1)176 (54.2)70 (52.2)20 (58.8)39 (60)0.803 (0.082)
Primary diagnosis group
 Cardiovascular70 (5.6)28 (4)29 (8.9)7 (5.2)1 (2.9)5 (7.7) 0.025 (0.135)
 Respiratory519 (41.1)227 (32.2)163 (50.2)69 (51.5)22 (64.7)38 (58.5) <0.001 (0.303)
 Surgical or trauma280 (22.2)182 (25.9)55 (16.9)28 (20.9)4 (11.8)11 (16.9) 0.009 (0.167)
 Neurologic217 (17.2)133 (18.9)52 (16)20 (14.9)4 (11.8)8 (12.3)0.403 (0.101)
 Shock429 (34)221 (31.4)152 (46.8)32 (23.9)10 (29.4)14 (21.5) <0.001 (0.253)
 Pain34 (2.7)21 (3)8 (2.5)3 (2.2)1 (2.9)1 (1.5)0.952 (0.048)
Comorbidities
 Cardiovascular213 (16.9)101 (14.4)69 (21.2)20 (14.9)7 (20.6)16 (24.6) 0.021 (0.137)
 Pulmonary468 (37.1)250 (35.5)124 (38.2)52 (38.8)13 (38.2)29 (44.6)0.615 (0.077)
 Neurologic428 (33.9)245 (34.8)92 (28.3)47 (35.1)15 (44.1)29 (44.6) 0.040 (0.175)
 Hepato-intestinal320 (25.4)154 (21.9)105 (32.3)35 (26.1)6 (17.7)20 (30.8) 0.006 (0.178)
 Hematologic132 (10.5)61 (8.7)42 (12.9)14 (10.5)3 (8.8)12 (18.5)0.061 (0.142)
 Oncologic143 (11.3)76 (10.8)51 (15.7)6 (4.5)3 (8.8)7 (10.8) 0.012 (0.167)
 Immunologic48 (3.8)25 (3.6)18 (5.5)4 (3)1 (2.9)0 (0)0.215 (0.153)
 Infectious disease134 (10.6)57 (8.1)47 (14.5)17 (12.7)2 (5.9)11 (16.9) 0.009 (0.182)
 Rheumatologic17 (1.4)7 (1)8 (2.5)1 (0.8)1 (2.9)0 (0)0.213 (0.135)
 Neuromuscular176 (14)93 (13.2)42 (12.9)17 (12.7)9 (26.5)15 (23.1) 0.044 (0.194)
 Metabolic192 (15.2)116 (16.5)51 (15.7)12 (9)2 (5.9)11 (16.9)0.109 (0.187)
 Nephrologic/urologic129 (10.2)55 (7.8)52 (16)14 (10.5)3 (8.8)5 (7.7) 0.003 (0.122)
% Fluid overload, at AKI diagnosis[a]3.6 (1, 7.5)3.1 (0.8, 6.2)3.3 (0.9, 7.7)7.5 (3.1, 14.5)9.1 (4.9, 13.9)4.6 (1.6, 9.9) <0.001 (0.411)
Severity of illness[a]
 PRISM-III5 (0, 9)3 (0, 7)9.5 (5, 16)3 (0, 6)3 (0, 9)3.5 (1.0, 10.0) <0.001 (0.477)
 PIM-21 (1, 4)1 (0, 3)3 (1, 10)2 (1, 4)1 (1, 3)1.5 (1.0, 5.0) <0.001 (0.446)
 PELOD-R10, (1, 12)10 (1, 11)11.5 (10, 20)10 (1, 12)5.5 (0.5, 11)11.0 (2.0, 11.0) <0.001 (0.463)
Any severity score >75th percentile[a]159 (29.9)55 (19.2)75 (53.6)16 (23.9)3 (20)10 (41.7) <0.001 (0.398)
Inotropic support, at AKI diagnosis222 (17.6)82 (11.7)113 (34.8)12 (9)4 (11.8)11 (16.9) <0.001 (0.293)
Exposure to nephrotoxins pre-AKI[a]
 NSAIDs96 (13.3)55 (13.3)13 (12.4)16 (11.9)8 (23.5)4 (11.4)0.482 (0.137)
 Other[b]220 (30.5)91 (22)47 (44.8)55 (41)16 (47.1)11 (31.4) <0.001 (0.272)

Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). Values in bold denote statistical significance. NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; ES = effect size, interpreted using Cohen's f as small (0.1), moderate (0.25) and large (0.4).

Reduced sample sizes: % fluid overload (n = 1240), PRISM (n = 405), PIM (n = 365), PELOD (n = 189), any SS >75th percentile (n = 532), NSAIDs (n = 722), other (n = 722).

Other nephrotoxins: vancomycin, amphotericin, aminoglycosides and radiocontrast exposure.

Demographics and characteristics of AKI phenotypes Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). Values in bold denote statistical significance. NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; ES = effect size, interpreted using Cohen's f as small (0.1), moderate (0.25) and large (0.4). Reduced sample sizes: % fluid overload (n = 1240), PRISM (n = 405), PIM (n = 365), PELOD (n = 189), any SS >75th percentile (n = 532), NSAIDs (n = 722), other (n = 722). Other nephrotoxins: vancomycin, amphotericin, aminoglycosides and radiocontrast exposure. Outcomes Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). Values in bold denote statistical significance. ES, effect size, interpreted using Cohen's f as small (0.1), moderate (0.25), and large (0.4). aMAKE28 calculated by any of three events: mortality, need for RRT at discharge, failure of renal recovery at study exit or 28 days. For missing data, components of the MAKE28 definition were adjudicated as ‘no’. bReduced sample sizes: ICU LOS and 28 ICU-free days (n = 1 178), receipt of MV (n = 1231), length of MV and 28-day MV-free days (n = 493/497 with MV), failure of renal recovery is at study exit or 28 days (n = 796).

Factors associated with MAKE28

On bivariate analysis, cardiovascular, respiratory and shock admitting diagnoses were associated with MAKE28 (Table 3). Having any severity score >75th percentile, need for inotropic support at AKI diagnosis and mechanical ventilation were similarly associated with MAKE28. Older patients had lower odds of having a MAKE28 outcome [odds ratio (OR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.67–0.81].
Table 3.

Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models for risk of MAKE28

Characteristic, n (column %)No MAKE28, n = 830 (65.8%)MAKE28, n = 432 (34.2%)Bivariable OR (95% CI)Multivariable[a] OR (95% CI)
Recurrent36 (4.3)29 (6.7)2.78 (1.66, 4.68)3.82 (2.07, 7.06)
Late-persistent23 (2.8)11 (2.5)1.65 (0.79, 3.46)2.60 (1.16, 5.83)
Late-transient111 (13.4)23 (5.3)0.72 (0.44, 1.16)0.78 (0.46, 1.34)
Early-persistent114 (13.7)211 (48.8)6.40 (4.79, 8.54)7.84 (5.45, 11.3)
Early-transient546 (65.8)158 (36.6)ReferenceReference
Age, years[b]7.5 (2.1, 14.4)2.8 (0.8, 11.2)0.74 (0.67, 0.81)0.64 (0.57, 0.72)
Male gender455 (54.8)245 (56.7)1.08 (0.85, 1.36)0.99 (0.75, 1.31)
Primary diagnosis group
 Cardiovascular37 (4.5)33 (7.6)1.77 (1.09, 2.88)
 Respiratory316 (38.1)203 (47)1.44 (1.14, 1.82)
 Surgical or trauma200 (24.1)80 (18.5)0.72 (0.54, 0.96)
 Neurologic140 (16.9)77 (17.8)1.07 (0.79, 1.45)
 Shock258 (31.1)171 (39.6)1.45 (1.14, 1.85)
 Pain25 (3)9 (2.1)0.69 (0.32, 1.48)
Comorbidities
 Cardiovascular134 (16.1)79 (18.3)1.16 (0.86, 1.58)
 Pulmonary304 (36.6)164 (38)1.06 (0.83, 1.35)
 Neurologic292 (35.2)136 (31.5)0.85 (0.66, 1.09)
 Hepato-intestinal182 (21.9)138 (31.9)1.67 (1.29, 2.17)1.39 (1.02, 1.90)
 Hematologic76 (9.2)56 (13)1.48 (1.02, 2.13)1.62 (1.03, 2.54)
 Oncologic81 (9.8)62 (14.4)1.55 (1.09, 2.21)1.58 (1.04, 2.40)
 Immunologic25 (3)23 (5.3)1.81 (1.02, 3.23)
 Infectious disease81 (9.8)53 (12.3)1.29 (0.89, 1.87)
 Rheumatologic13 (1.6)4 (0.9)0.59 (0.19, 1.81)
 Neuromuscular124 (14.9)52 (12)0.78 (0.55, 1.10)
 Metabolic122 (14.7)70 (16.2)1.12 (0.81, 1.54)1.50 (1.02, 2.22)
 Nephrologic/urologic63 (7.6)66 (15.3)2.19 (1.52, 3.17)1.86 (1.20, 2.88)
% FO, at AKI diagnosis3.7 (1.1, 7.4)3.5 (1.0, 7.9)1.00 (0.99, 1.02)
Severity of illness
 PRISM-III3 (0, 7)7 (3, 13)1.10 (1.06, 1.14)
 PIM-21 (1, 3)3 (1, 11.5)1.06 (1.03, 1.09)
 PELOD-R10 (1, 11)11 (1, 20)1.05 (1.01, 1.09)
Any severity score >75th percentile77 (21.5)82 (47.1)3.25 (2.20, 4.81)
Inotropic support, at AKI diagnosis115 (13.9)107 (24.8)2.05 (1.52, 2.75)1.30 (0.89, 1.90)
Nephrotoxins pre-AKI diagnosis
 NSAIDs85 (14.7)11 (7.6)0.47 (0.25, 0.92)
 Other[c]156 (27)64 (44.1)2.13 (1.46, 3.11)
ICU LOS, days5 (3, 8)5 (3, 9)1.01 (0.99, 1.03)
Receipt of MV308 (38.1)189 (44.7)1.31 (1.03, 1.66)0.98 (0.72, 1.34)
MV duration4 (2, 7)6 (2, 11)1.04 (1.01, 1.06)
Total AKI days1 (1, 2)2 (1, 5)1.56 (1.45, 1.67)

Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Age at ICU admission, gender, mechanical ventilation and inotropic support included in model, regardless of statistical significance.

OR for age at ICU admission increment in units of 5 years.

Vancomycin, ambisome/amphotericin, aminoglycosides, radiocontrast exposure.

Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models for risk of MAKE28 Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Age at ICU admission, gender, mechanical ventilation and inotropic support included in model, regardless of statistical significance. OR for age at ICU admission increment in units of 5 years. Vancomycin, ambisome/amphotericin, aminoglycosides, radiocontrast exposure. On multivariable analysis, the associations with MAKE28 held for hepato-intestinal, oncologic and nephrologic/urologic comorbidities. Metabolic comorbidity also was found to have significant association.

AKI phenotypes and outcomes

Among the subgroups, the early-persistent AKI phenotype had the worst outcome overall with the highest mortality rate (18.8%), highest percentage of patients requiring RRT during admission (15.1%) and the lowest 28-day MV-free days (19 days, IQR 0–24). At discharge, this phenotype also had the highest percentage of patients with failure of renal recovery (58.2%, 189/325) (Table 2).
Table 2.

Outcomes

Characteristics, n (%)Overall, n = 1262Early-transient, n = 704 (55.8%)Early-persistent, n = 325 (25.8%)Late-transient, n = 134 (10.6%)Late-persistent, n = 34 (2.7%)Recurrent, n = 65 (5.2%)P-value (ES)
MAKE28[a]432 (34.2)158 (22.4)211 (64.9)23 (17.2)11 (32.4)29 (44.6) <0.001 (0.524)
 Mortality81 (6.4)4 (0.6)61 (18.8)4 (3)5 (14.7)7 (10.8) <0.001 (0.355)
 Need for RRT at discharge39 (3.1)2 (0.3)33 (10.2)3 (2.2)0 (0)1 (1.5) <0.001 (0.246)
 Failure of renal recovery[b]397 (49.9)153 (39.8)189 (62.8)20 (41.7)8 (44.4)27 (60) <0.001 (0.262)
ICU length of stay[b]5 (3, 8)3 (2, 5)7 (4, 13)6 (5, 9)8 (8, 11)10 (8, 15) <0.001 (0.621)
28-Day ICU-free days[b]23 (18, 25)25 (23, 26)18 (6, 22)22 (19, 23)18 (13, 20)18 (9, 20) <0.001 (0.682)
Receipt of MV[a]497 (40.4)192 (28.4)186 (57.6)68 (50.8)13 (38.2)38 (58.5) <0.001 (0.330)
Length of MVb4 (2, 9)3 (1, 5)6 (3, 11)5 (3, 7)7 (5, 9)8 (5, 14) <0.001 (0.348)
28-Day MV-free days[b]23 (15, 26)25 (23, 27)19 (0, 24)23 (21, 25)21 (14, 23)20 (0, 23) <0.001 (0.533)
RRT during admission63 (5)7 (1)49 (15.1)3 (2.2)1 (2.9)3 (4.6) <0.001 (0.252)
Total AKI days1 (1, 3)1 (1, 1)4 (3, 6)1 (1, 1)3 (2, 4)3 (2, 4) <0.001 (1.512)

Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). Values in bold denote statistical significance. ES, effect size, interpreted using Cohen's f as small (0.1), moderate (0.25), and large (0.4).

aMAKE28 calculated by any of three events: mortality, need for RRT at discharge, failure of renal recovery at study exit or 28 days. For missing data, components of the MAKE28 definition were adjudicated as ‘no’.

bReduced sample sizes: ICU LOS and 28 ICU-free days (n = 1 178), receipt of MV (n = 1231), length of MV and 28-day MV-free days (n = 493/497 with MV), failure of renal recovery is at study exit or 28 days (n = 796).

MAKE28 outcomes

The early-persistent phenotype had the highest percentage of patients meeting a MAKE28 criteria (64.9%, n = 211). Under bivariate analysis, and relative to early-transient patients, this group carried the highest odds of having MAKE28 (OR 6.40, 95% CI 4.79–8.54), followed by the recurrent phenotype (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.66–4.68). In the multivariable logistic regression model, our findings remained consistent with the early-persistent phenotype retaining the strongest association with MAKE28 (OR 7.84, 95% CI 5.45–11.3), followed by the recurrent phenotype (OR 3.82, 95% CI 2.07–7.06) (Table 3).

28-Day discharge modeling

In this model where lower HR indicate a lower likelihood of ICU discharge, relative to early-transient and accounting for death as a competing risk, patients with the late-persistent AKI phenotype had the least desirable outcome with an HR of 0.30 (95% CI 0.22–0.42), followed by those in the recurrent phenotype (HR 0.33, CI 0.27–0.42), after adjustment (Table 4) (Figure 2).
Table 4.

Bivariable and multivariable CRA models for 28-day ICU discharge

Characteristic, n (column %)No event, n = 95 (7.5%)28-Day death, n = 74 (5.9%)28-Day discharge, n = 1093 (86.6%)Bivariable HR (95% CI)Multivariable[a] HR (95% CI)
Recurrent9 (9.5)6 (8.1)50 (4.6)0.29 (0.24, 0.36)0.33 (0.27, 0.42)
Late-persistent3 (3.2)4 (5.4)27 (2.5)0.31 (0.23, 0.41)0.30 (0.22, 0.42)
Late-transient15 (15.8)4 (5.4)115 (10.5)0.50 (0.43, 0.58)0.56 (0.48, 0.65)
Early-persistent28 (29.5)58 (78.4)239 (21.9)0.29 (0.25, 0.33)0.38 (0.33, 0.45)
Early-transient40 (42.1)2 (2.7)662 (60.5)ReferenceReference
Age, years[b]5.1 (0.7, 13)4.7 (0.9, 11.8)6.2 (1.4, 13.7)1.05 (1.01, 1.09)1.00 (0.99, 1.02)
Male gender54 (56.8)42 (56.8)604 (55.3)1.01 (0.91, 1.13)1.01 (0.90, 1.14)
Primary diagnosis group
 Cardiovascular6 (6.3)15 (20.3)49 (4.5)0.57 (0.43, 0.75)0.66 (0.49, 0.89)
 Respiratory46 (48.4)43 (58.1)430 (39.3)0.70 (0.62, 0.78)0.82 (0.72, 0.93)
 Surgical or trauma20 (21.1)4 (5.4)256 (23.4)1.29 (1.15, 1.46)
 Neurologic15 (15.8)15 (20.3)187 (17.1)1.05 (0.90, 1.21)0.82 (0.69, 0.96)
 Shock35 (36.8)40 (54.1)354 (32.4)0.87 (0.77, 0.98)
 Pain1 (1.1)1 (1.4)32 (2.9)1.27 (0.93, 1.73)
Comorbidities
 Cardiovascular20 (21.1)21 (28.4)172 (15.7)0.73 (0.63, 0.85)
 Pulmonary42 (44.2)28 (37.8)398 (36.4)0.91 (0.81, 1.02)
 Neurologic36 (37.9)21 (28.4)371 (33.9)1.03 (0.92, 1.16)
 Hepato-intestinal21 (22.1)19 (25.7)280 (25.6)0.92 (0.81, 1.03)
 Hematologic10 (10.5)19 (25.7)103 (9.4)0.74 (0.61, 0.90)0.82 (0.68, 0.98)
 Oncologic6 (6.3)11 (14.9)126 (11.5)0.94 (0.79, 1.12)
 Immunologic6 (6.3)6 (8.1)36 (3.3)0.86 (0.60, 1.24)
 Infectious disease16 (16.8)13 (17.6)105 (9.6)0.70 (0.59, 0.85)0.75 (0.59, 0.97)
 Rheumatologic1 (1.1)0 (0)16 (1.5)1.12 (0.84, 1.48)
 Neuromuscular23 (24.2)8 (10.8)145 (13.3)0.93 (0.80, 1.08)
 Metabolic21 (22.1)7 (9.5)164 (15)1.14 (0.97, 1.34)
 Nephrologic/urologic10 (10.5)9 (12.2)110 (10.1)0.91 (0.76, 1.08)1.17 (1.00, 1.37)
% FO at AKI diagnosis4.8 (1.7, 9.9)6.8 (3.2, 10.8)3.4 (0.9, 7.2)0.97 (0.96, 0.98)0.99 (0.98, 1.00)
Severity of illness
 PRISM-III8 (4, 14)14 (9, 22)4 (0, 8)0.94 (0.93, 0.96)
 PIM-23 (1, 16)5 (3.5, 52)1 (1, 3)0.96 (0.95, 0.97)
 PELOD-R11 (1, 13)20 (10, 32)10 (1, 11)0.95 (0.93, 0.97)
Any severity score >75th percentile13 (52)31 (77.5)115 (24.6)0.49 (0.40, 0.60)
Inotropic support, at AKI diagnosis23 (24.2)41 (55.4)158 (14.5)0.50 (0.42, 0.58)0.77 (0.65, 0.91)
Exposure to nephrotoxins, pre-AKI diagnosis
 NSAIDs7 (14)3 (10.3)86 (13.4)1.11 (0.90, 1.37)
 Other[c]15 (30)17 (58.6)188 (29.2)0.65 (0.55, 0.75)
Receipt of MV48 (75)56 (75.7)393 (36)0.44 (0.39, 0.49)0.51 (0.45, 0.59)
MV duration24.5 (17, 28)5 (2, 10)4 (2, 7)0.91 (0.89, 0.93)
RRT during admission12 (12.6)21 (28.4)30 (2.7)0.29 (0.20, 0.41)0.48 (0.35, 0.68)
Total AKI days2 (1, 5)2 (2, 5)1 (1, 2)0.82 (0.80, 0.84)

Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). aAge at ICU admission, gender, mechanical ventilation and inotropic support included in model, regardless of statistical significance.

HR for age at ICU admission increment in units of 5 years.

Vancomycin, ambisome/amphotericin, aminoglycosides, radiocontrast exposure.

Figure 2:

Cumulative incidence of 28-day discharge while accounting for death as a competing risk by AKI group.

Bivariable and multivariable CRA models for 28-day ICU discharge Where data are not presented as n (%), they are median (IQR). aAge at ICU admission, gender, mechanical ventilation and inotropic support included in model, regardless of statistical significance. HR for age at ICU admission increment in units of 5 years. Vancomycin, ambisome/amphotericin, aminoglycosides, radiocontrast exposure. Cumulative incidence of 28-day discharge while accounting for death as a competing risk by AKI group Values in bold denote statistical significance.

Sensitivity analysis

Patients who met inclusion criteria solely based on UOP (443/1262) were analyzed separately and conservatively assumed to have renal recovery for statistical purposes. Comparing them to patients who had both SCr and UOP available, patients qualifying on UOP appeared to be less severely ill, with only a 2% mortality rate (versus 19%) and one patient (0.2% versus 17.2%) needing RRT at discharge (Supplementary data).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this report is one of the first to study the timing of AKI as it relates to outcomes in critically ill children. While intuitively it seems that the timing of AKI onset would affect outcomes, we found that the trajectory of the resolution of AKI is a more significant predictor, with early-persistent AKI strongly associated with poorer outcomes. A surprising finding was the recurrent phenotype, where a second onset of AKI seemed to be a strong signal of poor prognosis. It is well established that AKI during a pediatric ICU admission is an independent predictor for mortality and morbidity, and much recent work has illuminated the need for more sophisticated stratifications of cohorts with pediatric critical care illness-related AKI. Our findings show that delineating the temporal nature and trajectory of AKI in a pediatric critical illness course carries a significant impact on patient outcomes. Recent consensus definitions for AKI have increasingly recommended inclusion of the temporal characteristics of AKI [10, 11]. However, the definitions of timing have so far have been widely variable, with some studies framing early AKI as present at admission versus up to a week into the hospital stay [12, 13]. The original KDIGO definition stipulates a timeline (a 0.3 mg/dL increase in SCr within 48 h or 1.5× SCr within 7 days), yet this time-sensitive aspect of the definition has frequently been ignored in the pediatric literature [8]. Available adult data actually show that many AKI events occur >48 h after ICU admission [14, 15]. More data are emerging—one recent paper exploring the effects of FO on AKI patients found that delineating distinct phenotypes within their cohort had implications for outcomes [16]. Another potentially illustrative analog is the work investigating the MODS population. While existing data show patients with Day 1 MODS have worse outcomes compared with those without [17], a recent study of septic pediatric patients showed the subsets of population whose MODS progressed and those who developed new MODS had worse morbidity and mortality [7]. One unique phenotype we introduced was the recurrent subgroup; while they comprise a small percentage of patients, their outcomes were significantly worse. This raises a question of a ‘second-hit’ theory (parallel to the findings in new and progressive MODS), in which some ICU patients who recovered from their initial AKI suffered another complication and worsening of their underlying diagnosis, versus underrecognition and undertreatment of subtle but ongoing AKI. While sparse, data in the surgical cardiac population suggest that a first episode of AKI may portend a worse episode later, potentially due to lower renal reserve [18]. Another possibility that would be challenging to differentiate is that the second onset of AKI is simply a marker of the underlying severity of illness. Nevertheless, whichever the underlying pathophysiology happens to be, the signal remains clear that this pattern of AKI represents a distinctive subset of patients, consistent with emerging literature [19, 20]. In 2015, Perinel et al. [21] examined critically ill adult patients and found that those with persistent AKI had a higher rate of mortality compared with those with transient AKI. An additional paper by Sanchez-Pinto et al. [22] examined the association of AKI progression in critically ill children with mortality, and found that patients whose AKI worsened from admission to peak and reached an AKI stage of 2 or 3 had higher mortality than patients without AKI and those whose AKI remained at stage 1. Of note, this study also found that despite AKI resolution, patients with stage 1 AKI still had increased mortality compared with those without. Since then, there has been no further pediatric study done on how the course of AKI during an ICU admission correlates with outcomes, but these findings suggest that the progression of AKI may be a clinically significant signal. While adult data on transient versus persistent AKI have so far been inconclusive, our study strengthens the assertion that rapid recovery of renal function is a favorable prognostic factor. Subtle differences in our definitions notwithstanding (adult studies have defined persistent AKI as ≥72 h, while we used a 48 h cut off), our study suggests that there are groups of patients—such as those with persistent AKI—who warrant additional attention in clinical practice, with the ‘early-persistent’ subgroup potentially a target for intervention. Certainly, our results seem in line with the evolving thought that AKI recovery pattern should acquire more importance in our prognostication [23-25] for both in-hospital and outpatient outcomes. In addition, we present a stratification framework that might be leveraged for interventional trials to fine-tune renal morbidity and selectively target at-risk patients expected to have worse outcomes for prognostic enrichment [26, 27]. Our study has several limitations arising from the retrospective nature of the analysis. As AWARE only collected data up to 7 days in the ICU, this created challenges for our follow-up, especially of the ‘late-persistent’ and the ‘recurrent’ subgroups whose second AKI incidences were diagnosed much later in the ICU stay. While this accounted for a small subset of our total cohort (168 patients in the ‘late-persistent’, 65 patients in the ‘recurrent’ category and only 13 patients whose AKI were diagnosed on Day 7 of ICU stay), data for potential renal recovery in this group is incomplete. We do not have enough granular follow-up data to ascertain precisely when late-persistent AKI resolved as their outcome data point was collected at Day 28 or at hospital discharge. Therefore, it is likely that we have underestimated the median duration of AKI in the cohort. In addition, we had a subset of the population whose inclusion was based solely on UOP data without an SCr value, which could skew our results. However, recent literature has demonstrated that patients diagnosed with AKI by either the SCr or UOP criterion only are distinct from those diagnosed based on both SCr and UOP criteria, and that although their clinical characteristics may be different, those diagnosed through the UOP criterion alone had comparable outcomes to patients who qualified through SCr criterion [28]. While we are aware that UOP data collection could be imprecise, we believed that this cohort remained important to include as they potentially represent a distinct subpopulation with discrete patient outcomes. The sensitivity analysis we conducted on the cohort supported this assumption (Supplementary data). Finally, while we had patients with missing data, we decided a priori to adjudicate patients with missing data to more favorable outcomes (i.e. no continuous RRT, MAKE28) in order to conservatively bias us away from an effect.

CONCLUSION

We present a novel classification strategy of AKI in pediatric critical care illness. Our study shows that there are clear differences between subgroups outcomes. While the timing of AKI onset did not seem to hold a large significance, we found that AKI trajectory and renal recovery are valuable information for prognostication, with AKI resolution potentially playing an important part. Our findings with regard to the recurrent and early-persistent subgroups are intriguing and raise questions regarding identifying underlying causes. These subgroups may also represent rich targets for further investigation and clinical interventions. Click here for additional data file.
Table 5.

Cumulative incidence of 28-day discharge while accounting for death as a competing risk by AKI group

Study group n Mortality eventsDischarge events28-Day discharge incidence (95% CI)Gray's P-valuePairwise (1)Pairwise (2)Pairwise (3)Pairwise (4)
Recurrent5865086.2% (73.8%, 93.0%) <0.001
Late-persistent3142787.1% (65.1%, 95.7%)1.000
Late-transient120411595.8% (89.8%, 98.3%) 0.001 0.038
Early-persistent3015823979.4% (74.4%, 83.5%)1.0001.000 0.001
Early-transient668266299.1% (97.9%, 99.6%) 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001

Values in bold denote statistical significance.

  27 in total

1.  Association Between Acute Kidney Injury Duration and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Rashid Alobaidi; Natalie Anton; Shauna Burkholder; Daniel Garros; Gonzalo Garcia Guerra; Emma H Ulrich; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Risk Factors for Recurrent Acute Kidney Injury in Children Who Undergo Multiple Cardiac Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Denise C Hasson; John T Brinton; Ellen Cowherd; Danielle E Soranno; Katja M Gist
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Pediatric patients with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Stuart L Goldstein; Michael J G Somers; Michelle A Baum; Jordan M Symons; Patrick D Brophy; Douglas Blowey; Timothy E Bunchman; Cheryl Baker; Theresa Mottes; Nancy McAfee; Joni Barnett; Gloria Morrison; Kristine Rogers; James D Fortenberry
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Shigehiko Uchino; Rinaldo Bellomo; Donna Goldsmith; Samantha Bates; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study.

Authors:  Eric A J Hoste; Sean M Bagshaw; Rinaldo Bellomo; Cynthia M Cely; Roos Colman; Dinna N Cruz; Kyriakos Edipidis; Lui G Forni; Charles D Gomersall; Deepak Govil; Patrick M Honoré; Olivier Joannes-Boyau; Michael Joannidis; Anna-Maija Korhonen; Athina Lavrentieva; Ravindra L Mehta; Paul Palevsky; Eric Roessler; Claudio Ronco; Shigehiko Uchino; Jorge A Vazquez; Erick Vidal Andrade; Steve Webb; John A Kellum
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Ascertainment and epidemiology of acute kidney injury varies with definition interpretation.

Authors:  Michael Zappitelli; Chirag R Parikh; Ayse Akcan-Arikan; Kimberley K Washburn; Brady S Moffett; Stuart L Goldstein
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Epidemiology of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Children and Young Adults.

Authors:  Ahmad Kaddourah; Rajit K Basu; Sean M Bagshaw; Stuart L Goldstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Validation of the KDIGO acute kidney injury criteria in a pediatric critical care population.

Authors:  David T Selewski; Timothy T Cornell; Michael Heung; Jonathan P Troost; Brett J Ehrmann; Rebecca M Lombel; Neal B Blatt; Kera Luckritz; Sue Hieber; Robert Gajarski; David B Kershaw; Thomas P Shanley; Debbie S Gipson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Utilizing electronic health records to predict acute kidney injury risk and outcomes: workgroup statements from the 15(th) ADQI Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Scott M Sutherland; Lakhmir S Chawla; Sandra L Kane-Gill; Raymond K Hsu; Andrew A Kramer; Stuart L Goldstein; John A Kellum; Claudio Ronco; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-02-26

10.  Association Between Early Recovery of Kidney Function After Acute Kidney Injury and Long-term Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Pavan K Bhatraju; Leila R Zelnick; Vernon M Chinchilli; Dennis G Moledina; Steve G Coca; Chirag R Parikh; Amit X Garg; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Alan S Go; Kathleen D Liu; T Alp Ikizler; Edward D Siew; James S Kaufman; Paul L Kimmel; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Mark M Wurfel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Neglected Price of Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury: Non-renal Implications.

Authors:  Chetna K Pande; Mallory B Smith; Danielle E Soranno; Katja M Gist; Dana Y Fuhrman; Kristin Dolan; Andrea L Conroy; Ayse Akcan-Arikan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.569

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.