Oxalate nephropathy: a review.

This review describes the clinical and pathological features of oxalate nephropathy (ON), defined as a syndrome of decreased renal function associated with deposition of calcium oxalate crystals in kidney tubules. We review the different causes of hyperoxaluria, including primary hyperoxaluria, enteric hyperoxaluria and ingestion-related hyperoxaluria. Recent case series of biopsy-proven ON are reviewed in detail, as well as the implications of these series. The possibility of antibiotic use predisposing to ON is discussed. Therapies for hyperoxaluria and ON are reviewed with an emphasis on newer treatments available and in development. Promising research avenues to explore in this area are discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Oxalate nephropathy (ON) is defined by an acute and/or chronic decrease in kidney function associated with the deposition of calcium oxalate crystals, in kidney tubules. There is also typically acute tubular injury and an associated acute/chronic interstitial nephritis or fibrosis [1-5]. The term ON is used in this review in preference to nephrocalcinosis as the latter term also (and according to some authors, exclusively) [6] includes calcium phosphate deposition. Furthermore, nephrocalcinosis is also often used as a term to describe calcification of the renal parenchyma as seen on radiological imaging [7], while ON implies a pathological diagnosis. See Figure 1 for representative light microscopic images including that of intratubular oxalate crystals as seen under polarized light. Calcium oxalate crystals are birefringent under polarized light, unlike calcium phosphate crystals. ON can often cause progressive kidney dysfunction and there is a significant risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [1-5]. This review will focus on the causes of ON, which in most cases is due to hyperoxaluria (defined by a 24-h urine oxalate of >40–45 mg/day) [8]. We will review the four largest series of ON that have been published recently and discuss the implications of these series. Then we will discuss the latest treatments being developed for hyperoxaluria and ON and outline areas in need of further attention. Issues of kidney transplant will be touched on briefly, but are not emphasized in this review.

FIGURE 1:

Renal oxalosis: (A) Massive deposition of oxalate crystals is noted in tubules with associated advanced chronic tubulointerstitial disease with atrophy and dropout of tubules and prominent interstitial fibrosis and nonspecific inflammation (H&E, bright field, 40X). (B) Same area visualized under polarized light reveals numerous intratubular crystals (H&E, polarized light, 40X). (C) Intratubular oxalate crystals are often transparent or reveal yellow or gray color, with needle or other shapes of crystals (H&E, bright field, 600X). (D) Same area visualized under polarized light reveals colorful crystals (H&E, polarized light, 600X)

PREVALENCE

The overall prevalence of ON has not been clear as a significant amount of the literature has been based on case reports, but two recent reviews have addressed this. Buysschaert et al. [2] found that ON made up 1% of native kidney biopsies in a Belgian series from 2010 to 2018. Only cases with progressive kidney dysfunction were included. Cases were excluded if there were other kidney diseases aside from non-specific nephrosclerosis or diabetic nephropathy. Our group, in a recently published study, which included other concomitant diagnoses, found that the prevalence of any oxalate deposition was as high as 4.07% of biopsies in a New York City metro area population [3]. Oxalate deposition in this study was considered the primary or contributing cause of kidney disease progression in 88% of the cases, with an estimated prevalence of 3.6%.

CAUSES OF ON

Primary hyperoxaluria

This topic has been reviewed in greater detail elsewhere by Cochat and Rumsby [9], but this review will emphasize a number of salient points. Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a group of autosomal recessive disorders causing primarily hepatic overproduction of oxalate, due to accumulation of the oxalate precursor glyoxylate. This leads to calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis and multisystem deposits of calcium oxalate, including in the kidneys, and accounts for 1–2% of pediatric ESKD. While the median age of onset is 5.5 years, it can sometimes present in adulthood with kidney stones or kidney failure, and should be considered in cases of hyperoxaluria and ON without another obvious cause. PH Type 1 (PH1), which accounts for ∼80% of PH cases, is also the most severe subtype. It is due to a deficiency of hepatic alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT), which normally catalyzes the metabolism of glyoxylate to glycine. A definitive diagnosis of PH requires genetic testing, such as for a mutation in AGXT, which encodes AGT, in PH1. See Figure 2 for a simplified summary of hepatic pathways of oxalate metabolism. It is notable that the urinary oxalate excretion tends to be higher in PH (>88 mg/day) as opposed to 44–70 mg/day in enteric hyperoxaluria [8]. However, there is enough overlap that a definitive distinction between PH and enteric hyperoxaluria cannot generally be made based on urinary oxalate excretion alone. Systemic oxalosis, due to very high plasma oxalate levels, is common in PH as renal failure progresses, but this is seen only very rarely in other forms of hyperoxaluria [10]. In patients with renal insufficiency, very high plasma oxalate levels might be useful in distinguishing PH from other forms of kidney disease, including secondary hyperoxaluria [11].

FIGURE 2:

Simplified hepatic pathways of glyoxylate metabolism

Enteric hyperoxaluria

Enteric hyperoxaluria (EH) is defined by hyperoxaluria occurring in the setting of fat malabsorption or steatorrhea [10, 12]. Normally, calcium binds oxalate in the bowel to form insoluble calcium oxalate that is excreted in the feces. In a state of fat malabsorption, calcium is bound by free fatty acids and becomes unavailable for oxalate binding. There is then increased soluble oxalate available to be absorbed by the bowel. Free fatty acids and bile salts may also directly increase colonic permeability to oxalate [13]. An intact colon appears likely to be important for oxalate absorption, and hyperoxaluria in EH has generally not been observed in patients where the colon is not utilized such as in patients with ileostomies after colectomy [14, 15]. Why this is so is not certain, and oxalate absorption also occurs in the proximal gut as evidenced by an increase in urinary oxalate in response to an oral oxalate load in patients with ileostomies in one study [16], though these particular patients did not have baseline EH. Solute-linked carrier 26 (SCL26) anion exchangers, which are a family of transporters that mediate transcellular oxalate transport, are differentially expressed along the gut [8], though it is felt that most oxalate absorption likely occurs paracellularly [17]. The risk of calcium oxalate precipitation is likely worsened by volume depletion from diarrhea as well as bicarbonate loss, which can lead to metabolic acidosis and hypocitraturia.

Both nephrolithiasis and ON were frequent complications of one of the first surgical treatments for obesity, jejunoileal bypass. This procedure involved bypassing much of the small bowel, causing significant malabsorption. This procedure was largely abandoned by 1979 due to high morbidity, including the development of renal failure in as many as 35% of patients [18, 19]. More recently, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which replaced jejunoileal bypass as the procedure of choice for malabsorptive bariatric surgery, has been recognized as a cause of ON [4]. So too have other malabsorptive states such as chronic pancreatitis [5], and after bowel resections for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [20]. Orlistat, a weight loss agent that also causes fat malabsorption, has similarly been recognized to cause hyperoxaluria and ON [21]. It is important to note that while IBD is often listed as a cause of ON, reports of ON in IBD have virtually all been in patients who have had previous bowel resections, and with presumed malabsorption. Similarly, while malabsorptive bariatric surgery, such as jejunoileal bypass and Roux-en-Y surgery, is strongly associated with ON, this has not been seen with restrictive weight loss surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy, where the small bowel is not bypassed.

Ingestions

Ingestions include the direct consumption of oxalate in foods with high oxalate content, and also the ingestion of oxalate precursors. A classic and dramatic cause of ingestion-related ON is ethylene glycol (EG). EG is the active ingredient in antifreeze, but is also present in a number of solvents, paints and other industrial and commercial products [22]. Ingested EG is metabolized in the liver to oxalic acid (Figure 3) and causes acute ON with acute tubular injury and oxalate crystal deposition in tubules. There are frequently numerous urine calcium oxalate crystals present in the urine that can be a sign of the diagnosis. See Figure 4 for an image of monohydrate and dihydrate calcium oxalate crystals in urine.

FIGURE 3:

Metabolism of ethylene glycol to oxalate

FIGURE 4:

Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate and Calcium Oxalate Dihydrate crystals in spun urine Reproduced according to License CC BY-SA 3.0. Photo by Doruk Salanci

There have also been multiple case reports of ON associated with high dietary oxalate intake from a number of sources, as well as due to ingestions of the oxalate precursor vitamin C (ascorbic acid) [23-55]. Figure 5 shows the non-enzymatic metabolism of vitamin C to oxalate. These reports have generally involved excessive intake of high oxalate foods or megadoses of vitamin C, though some cases have been reported involving more moderate amounts, especially with chronic intake (Table 1). There have been reports of ON from juicing of vegetables, such as spinach smoothies in one report [55] and an assortment of high oxalate vegetables (together with vitamin C) in another [47]. It has been speculated that juiced oxalate foods may be more effectively absorbed in the intestine via the paracellular pathway via solvent drag and because of dilution of calcium by water [56]. Recently, the most frequent case reports have seemed to involve star fruit (carambola) [28-32] and vitamin C supplements [23–27, 35, 46, 50–54, 57], while other ingestions are reported less commonly. The reason for this is not clear. Vitamin C is likely a more bioavailable source of oxalate than food. This is because oxalate in food is complexed with calcium (and to a lesser degree magnesium), limiting absorption. Furthermore, vitamin C is taken by a large segment of the population, sometimes at very high doses. It has recently also used at high intravenous doses as a treatment for sepsis, including in patients with COVID-19 infection [23, 52]. It should also be noted that there is a significant amount of vitamin C in common beverages such as apple juice or orange juice (∼800 mg/L).

FIGURE 5:

Metabolism of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) to oxalate

Table 1.

Reported ingestions causing ON

Substance ingested	Quantity of typical reported ingestion causing biopsy confirmed ON	Notes
Star fruit (Averrhoa carambola)	200–3000 mL of pure juice	One case reported ingestion of only 200 mL as remedy for diabetes. One case only reported chronic intake of 5–6 fruit over 1 month and then four fruit over 4 days [29]
	6–12 fruit in 1 setting [28–32]
Vitamin C [23–27, 46, 49–54, 57]
Oral	2–6.5 g daily	One case reported ingestion as low as 480–960 mg vitamin C daily for 4 months [26]
IV	4–5 g daily	Two cases reported in COVID+ patients receiving 50 mg/kg 4×/day vitamin C for sepsis [23]
Irumban puli (Averrhoa bilimbi)	150–400 mL juice/day [43]	Irumban puli (A. bilimbi) is a local fruit in South India which has relatively high oxalic acid content and is drunk as a beverage
		Oxalate content of the fruit was 25.1 mg/100 g of the fruit [42]
Peanuts	100–243 g peanuts daily for 2–3 months [39–40]	–
Cashews	1 kg of cashews/week for 4 months [38]	–
Almonds and almond-containing marzipan	150–200 g of almonds and 50–100 g of almond-containing marzipan daily [41]	–
Rhubarb	500 g fresh weight/day for >4 weeks [44]	–
Chaga mushroom powder	4–5 teaspoons/day of Chaga mushroom powder for 6 months [48]	11.2 g of oxalate in 100 g of the powder; it was used as a remedy for liver cancer [48]
Black iced tea	Sixteen 8 oz glasses daily [45]	Daily consumption of oxalate >1500 mg in one case report [45]
Juicing	Celery, carrots, parsley beets with greens and spinach taken with Vitamin C in one [47] and two cups spinach/day in the other [55]	The oxalate content was estimated at ∼1300 mg/day in each report
Nafronyl oxalate	7 g over 2 days [36]	19 mg oxalate/100 mg Nafril capsule
		Was given to patient for toothache and otalgia
		Used to treat peripheral and cerebrovascular disease [36]

Majority of reports are isolated cases other than for vitamin C, star fruit and Irumban puli. IV, intravenous.

Star fruit may be a frequent culprit, even though it is estimated to contain less oxalate than spinach or rhubarb by weight, possibly because it can be consumed as a concentrated juice or can be eaten easily in large quantities. It has been suggested that star fruit may contain a neurotoxin as well, and there have been reports of acute neurological symptoms from star fruit ingestion in patients already being dialyzed that responded to intensified dialysis [58]. It is possible that star fruit ingestion might come to medical attention more frequently because of these associated symptoms.

See Table 2 for a list of high oxalate foods. It must be noted, as can be seen in the table, that there is a broad range of oxalate content for each item, as amounts vary based on how it is measured, the way the food is prepared, the particular cultivar (genetic variation within a species) of food, and even the season. The oxalate content can also vary widely between the leaf (usually highest) and the stem and root [59-63].

Table 2.

Foods with high oxalate content and estimated amounts

Substance	Oxalate content in mg/100 g
Purslane	910–1679
Spinach varieties	320–1260
Garden orach	300–1500
Rhubarb	260–1235
Sorrel	270–730
Cocoa	170–623
Beet leaves	121–920
Beet root	76–675
Almonds	431–490
Cashews	231–262
Hazelnuts	167–223
Peanuts	96–705
Carambola/star fruit	80–730
Buckwheat	269–271
Soy	179–187
Coffee	50–150
Black tea (100 mL brewed)a	48–92

Tea 100 g fresh weight content estimated much higher (300–2000), green tea (6–26) and herbal tea (0–8) much lower estimates/100 mL.

Sources: Noonan [59] Massey et al. [60], Tsai et al. [61] and Chai et al. [62].

Furthermore, the toxicity may depend more on the bioavailability of the item, which depends on the calcium content as well, as mentioned above. It is notable that in many of the case reports involving acute ingestions and acute kidney injury, patients frequently had renal improvement or recovery, suggesting that this may have a better prognosis than the other forms of ON.

SERIES

Most published cases of ON have been in the form of individual case reports, but there have been four published series of patients with biopsy-proven ON, comprising more than a few cases, published relatively recently. Table 3 summarizes the key clinical data for these series. The first series was published in 2008 in a series of 11 patients who had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [4]. Most of the patients had underlying diabetes and all had hypertension. All patients presented with acute renal failure (ARF), often superimposed on chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a mean serum creatinine at presentation of 5.0 mg/dL. The mean and median times from surgery to ARF were 33 and 12 months, respectively. Only three patients had urine or serum oxalate levels done and they were reported as ‘elevated’. Two patients had crystalluria on urinalysis. No imaging was reported. Biopsies were notable for abundant tubular calcium oxalate deposits in intraluminal and intracellular areas, and also focally in the interstitium. The oxalate crystalline deposits were accompanied by diffuse tubular injury as well as tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis (IF). Areas of IF also had interstitial inflammation without tubulitis. Eight of the 11 patients progressed to ESKD and the remaining three had stable to improved renal function at follow-up ranging from 2.5 to 22 months.

Table 3.

Key clinical data in four largest case series

Clinical data	Nasr et al. [4] (2018) (n = 11)	Cartery et al. [5] (2011) (n = 12)	Buysschaert et al. [2] (2020) (n = 21)	Yang et al. [3] (2020) (n = 25)
Age, years (range)	61.3 (45–79)	67 (41–91)	61 ± 20	63.6 ± 9.1
Gender, male	5 (45)	9 (75)	14 (67)	13 (52)
White race	8 (72.7)		21 (100)
Diabetes	9 (81.8)	9 (75)	12 (57)	16 (64)
Hypertension	11 (100)	8 (66.7)	16 (76)	19 (76)
Baseline CKD		7 (58.3)	13 (62)
Urinary stones		3 (25)	3 (14)	1 (4)
RAAS inhibitor use	3 (27.3)	8 (66.7)	8 (38)
Diuretic use	3 (27.3)	5 (41.6)	9 (43)
Baseline creatinine, mg/dL (range)	1.5 (0.9–2.5)	1.1 (0.79–2.02)
GFR baseline, mL/min/1.73 m2 (range)		57 (36–89)	36 ± 7
Serum creatinine at time of presentation, mg/dL (range)	5.0 (2.4–9.2)	6.6 (3.3–9.6)	8.0 ± 4.5	6.3 ± 3.2
EH	11 (100)	12 (100)	10 (48)	10 (40)
Ingestion related	–	1 (8.3)	2 (10)	4 (16)
Recent antibiotic use	–	4 (33.3)	3 (14)	13 (52)
Uncertain cause	–		3 (14)	11 (44)
Presence of hypocalcemia	–	9 (75)		6 (24)
Microscopic hematuria	3 (27.3)	3 (25)	5 (24)
Leukocyturia	6 (54.5)	10 (83.3)	5 (24)
Urine protein (range)	24 h, 1.4 g/day (0.37–6.00)	0.34 g/day (0.05–1.01)	1.4 g/g ± 2.0	52.04 mg/g ± 71.38
Diabetic glomerulopathy	7 (63.6)	3 (25)	6 (28.6)	8 (29.6)
Acute tubular injury	11 (100)	12 (100)	21 (100)	17 (63)
Acute/chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis	11 (100)	9 (75)	(Acute) 18 (85.7)	(Acute) 9 (33.3)   (Chronic) 8 (32)

Data are reported in mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise noted. Urine protein is random protein/creatinine ratio unless specified.

The second series, published in 2011, was a series of 12 patients with chronic pancreatitis [5]. Hypertension was present in 67%, diabetes in 75% and one patient had a renal transplant due to diabetic nephropathy. Many of the patients had a recent history of diarrhea, diuretic use and/or use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. One-third of patients had been given antibiotics shortly before presentation and one had been given a course of intravenous vitamin C. On presentation with ON, mean serum creatinine was 587 µmol/L or 6.6 mg/dL. Renal imaging was unremarkable except renal atrophy in three cases and non-obstructive nephrolithiasis in three. In the 11 patients it was measured, 24-h urine oxalate was elevated and ranged from 52 to 92 mg/day. No patient had crystalluria on urinalysis. Renal biopsies showed acute tubular injury in all cases with interstitial inflammation and edema. All cases had large calcium oxalate crystals in tubular lumens, epithelial cells and interstitium. After a mean of 7 months of follow-up, one-quarter of patients required long-term dialysis, and the rest had a mean serum creatinine of 212 µmol/L (2.4 mg/dL) and eGFR of 25 mL/min/1.73 m2.

The latest two series were published in 2020. Unlike the previously mentioned series, which focused on specific populations at risk for ON, these surveyed biopsy databases for ON cases. Buysschaert et al. [2] identified 22 cases of ON from a Belgian database, comprising 1% of native biopsies. Twenty-one of the cases had adequate clinical data. Fifty-seven percent were diabetic and 76% were hypertensive. Sixty-two percent had underlying CKD with a mean eGFR of 36 mL/min/1.73 m2 prior to development of ON. The majority took a renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor and/or a diuretic. All patients presented with acute kidney injury (with or without underlying CKD), with a mean serum creatinine of 8.0 ± 4.5. Urine oxalate/creatinine was reported as 86 ± 58 mg in 16 cases. Three patients had a nephrolithiasis history but renal ultrasounds showed normal-sized kidneys without mention of nephrocalcinosis or stones. Pathologically, aside from oxalate deposition in all cases, most cases had mild-to-moderate acute interstitial nephritis and mild-to-moderate acute tubular necrosis.

The predominant cause of ON in this series was EH, present in 71.5% of cases. This was mostly due to chronic pancreatitis and gastric bypass. There were two cases attributed to orlistat use, one to small bowel resection in a patient with Crohn’s disease, and lenalidomide-induced bile acid malabsorption in one patient with multiple myeloma. Ten of 15 patients with EH presented with clinical steatorrhea at diagnosis of ON. Toxic ingestion made up 13.6% and included two cases of EG intoxication and one of massive vitamin C intake. The other three (13.6%) cases did not have a clear cause for ON despite a work-up for malabsorption as well as genetic causes.

All patients were treated with intravenous fluids and calcium supplements as well as low fat and low oxalate diets. Pancreatic enzymes were started or increased as needed and orlistat and vitamin C were withdrawn. During a mean follow-up of 29 ± 67 months, 52% progressed to ESKD. Serum creatinine and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy score were most predictive of progression. Of those who did not progress, there was still significant CKD and the mean eGFR at follow-up was 32 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m2. Only one patient, who had a history of gastric bypass, had complete renal recovery.

Finally, 25 patients with oxalate deposits were identified from a New York City metro area database, for whom this was a major finding consistent with ON in 22 [3]. Seventy-six percent were hypertensive and 64% had diabetes. Mean serum creatinine at presentation was 6.31 ± 3.23 mg/dL. In the five patients for which it was measured, 24-h urine oxalate was elevated. No imaging was documented. On biopsy, aside from oxalate deposition, acute tubular injury was present in 64%, chronic interstitial nephritis in 32% and acute interstitial nephritis in 12%.

Forty percent of patients were felt to have a primarily enteric cause of hyperoxaluria. Three additional patients were ingesting large amounts of oxalate, including one who drank 10 cups a day of black tea, another who took large amounts of bitter melon tea, and a third who consumed large amounts of nuts and kale smoothies. One patient ingested antifreeze. One patient was diagnosed with likely PH. Only five cases in the series had 24-h urine oxalate available and it was elevated in all. In as many as 44% of cases the cause of the oxalate deposition was not clear.

Five patients were treated with some form of oral calcium to lower oxalate absorption and four received sevelamer. One patient with possible PH received pyridoxine. This study had short follow-up of only 3 months but the risk of ESKD was 24%. Serum creatinine at diagnosis was the primary risk factor for progression, but this study was unique in looking at oxalate density determined by percentiles of crystal density ranging between <0.4/mm2 tissue (lowest) and >1.5/mm2 (highest) as a risk factor. This was found to be of borderline significance.

In summary, these four series suggest that ON is likely not rare, especially among those with risk factors such as bowel disease. Most cases have other underlying risk factors for worsening kidney disease such as older age, diabetes and/or hypertension, and underlying CKD. Aside from oxalate deposits, tubular injury is the most common pathologic finding. Renal imaging was generally unremarkable when done, without evidence of nephrocalcinosis, though some cases had renal stones present. This appears to distinguish these causes from PH. In the Rare Kidney Stone Consortium registry, kidney stones were found in 61% and nephrocalcinosis in 37% on imaging (primarily ultrasound) of PH patients [7]. The prognosis of ON was poor in these series, with a high percentage of progression to ESKD or persistent advanced CKD.

It is also notable that in the two series of patients who were not selected for a particular underlying condition, the cause of ON could not always be determined. In fact, in the latter study up to 44% did not have a clear etiology. It is possible that PH may be underdiagnosed, or that there are other secondary causes that are not easily identified. This brings up the issue of antibiotic use.

ANTIBIOTIC USE

As mentioned above, a significant percentage of cases in the previous two series did not have a clear cause of ON. It has been suggested that antibiotic use, especially antibiotics that deplete intestinal Oxalobacter formigenes, which metabolizes oxalate, could lead to hyperoxaluria [64]. Studies have shown that depletion of gut Oxalobacter was associated with increased urinary oxalate, especially in kidney stone-forming patients [65, 66]. A recent study by Tasian et al. [66], showed that antibiotic exposure was associated with a risk of kidney stones ≥3 months after exposure (though the type of stones was not known in this study). This appeared to be independent of an effect on Oxalobacter as this was observed with antibiotics that Oxalobacter was resistant to in many cases. The effect may be related to some other alteration in the intestinal microbiome, though this study did not have information on either the microbiome or on urine chemistries in order to document what urinary changes were present. In our study, 13 of the patients (52%) had been exposed to antibiotics within a month of the biopsy with ON. This certainly does not prove causation, but further research is needed on this possible association.

DIABETES

It is notable that ∼35% of patients in these studies had documented diabetic glomerulopathy on biopsy. To some extent, this could be because the population was older (mean age 60 years), and diabetes is more common with aging. Diabetes has also been associated with increased oxalate excretion, perhaps via an increase in oxalate precursors such as glyoxylate and glyoxal that has been observed in diabetes [67]. Furthermore, diabetes is associated with dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract, including gastroparesis and diabetes-related enteropathy [68], which would make these patients prone to volume depletion and an increase in urine supersaturation of calcium oxalate. Not all patients with hyperoxaluria develop ON and a concomitant insult such as volume depletion is likely one key factor in precipitating it.

TREATMENT

The main intervention used in most patients in case series and case reports is, as expected, intravenous or oral hydration, which would serve to lower the concentration of urinary oxalate. Oral citrate has been used to inhibit crystallization in both primary and secondary hyperoxaluria, though outcome data are limited [9, 10, 69]. The treatment of PH depends on the mutation, and pyridoxine may be useful for some with Type 1 mutation as well as liver transplantation. In November 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved lumasiran as the first drug treatment for PH1. Lumasiran is an RNA interference (RNAi) agent that degrades the messenger RNA for the hepatic enzyme glycolate oxidase. By preventing the conversion of glycolate to glyoxylate this agent decreases the amount of glyoxylate available to be converted to oxalate. The Illuminate-A study [70] showed that in 39 PH1 patients randomized to lumasiran versus placebo, urinary oxalate excretion decreased by 65.4% in the lumasiran group. At 6 months, 84% had 24-h urinary oxalate within 1.5 times normal versus none in the placebo group. There was no difference in eGFR in this short-term study.

The anti-epileptic agent stiripentol has been found to inhibit the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme 5 that converts glyoxylate to oxalate. A recent study [71] found that stiripental protected rat kidneys from oxalate deposition in models of dietary-induced ON and EG poisoning. Children who took this medicine as an anti-epileptic were found to have lower urine oxalate compared with controls. One patient with PH1 was given stiripental with significant decrease in urine oxalate. An RNAi of LDH was developed (Nedosiran) and was used in a single patient with ESKD with significant decrease in blood oxalate levels [72]. A study of this agent in patients with both PH1 and PH2 is ongoing (NCT03847909).

For acute ingestions, it is crucial to identify the source of oxalate or precursor and remove it from the patient’s diet. EG ingestion is treated with ethanol or fomepizole to competitively inhibit the metabolism of EG by alcohol dehydrogenase (Figure 3). For EH, or if the cause of the ON is not clear, a number of treatments have been utilized. Non-specific treatments include lowering oxalate intake as well as increasing oral calcium intake via diet or calcium supplements as a means of binding oxalate in the bowel. Studies have shown these interventions to have a variable effect on urinary oxalate [10, 12]. It is important to maintain a high fluid intake to avoid an increase in calcium oxalate supersaturation with an increase in calcium intake. Lowering fat intake has been used as well. Sevelamer hydrochloride, a phosphate binder that also binds fatty acids, was used in a single small trial of patients with EH and caused a non-significant decrease in urinary oxalate [73]. Cholestyramine, a bile acid binder, has been studied with the understanding that it may decrease bile acid effect on colon permeability and also may directly bind oxalate. There have been conflicting results with this in EH, with some studies showing decreased, increased or no difference in oxalate absorption [8, 9]. Manipulating the microbiome with probiotics or specifically with oral O. formigenes has been studied. Two randomized controlled trials of oral O. formigenes in PH patients did not lower urine oxalate [74, 75]. Other probiotic agents have also thus far not proven very effective in EH [64, 76].

Despite the lack of benefit so far in studies of probiotic and Oxalobacter trials, pilot studies of an orally administered, non-absorbed, oxalate-degrading enzyme have shown promise for EH. Reloxaliase (formerly known as ALLN-177) is a recombinant oxalate decarboxylase. It lowered urine oxalate in two patients with CKD Stage 3b and plasma oxalate in seven patients with CKD Stage 5 (in both groups by ∼30%), in a recent open-label, single-arm trial [77]. A randomized trial of reloxaliase in EH is now recruiting and is estimated to be completed in November 2023 (NCT03847090).

It is of course important to identify specific causes of EH. For example, chronic pancreatitis is treated with pancreatic enzymes. Use of orlistat, which is available over the counter under the trade name Alli, can be an easily reversible cause of EH. It is more difficult to treat EH related to bariatric surgery. Jejunoileal bypass has been reversed successfully in number of cases of hyperoxaluria [78], and there has been a recent report of reversal of Roux-en-Y for ON with resolution of hyperoxaluria and stabilization of renal dysfunction [79].

Finally, it has become clear that there is downstream inflammation in hyperoxaluric patients that perpetuates chronic interstitial damage and progressive kidney disease. Pro-inflammatory molecules are released from tubular cells damaged by crystals that recruit immune cells to the renal interstitium and activate local macrophages and dendritic cells [80]. Animal models of ON have suggested that suppressing mediators of inflammation including cytokines like tumor necrosis factor, as well as components of cytokine activators in macrophages and dendritic cells called inflammasomes, can be beneficial in limiting progressive damage. One inflammasome component called NLRP3 appears to be crucial and agents are available that can be used in humans and are under investigation for a number of different illnesses [80, 81]. See Table 4 for summary of possible treatments for oxalate nephropathy.

Table 4.

Treatments discussed in this review

Clinical data	Mechanism	Notes	Current trials
PH
High fluid intake	Lowers urinary calcium oxalate supersaturation	Prompt initiation of high fluid intake with urinary alkalinization may slow progression [82]	–
Pyridoxine	Increase function of AGT	Useful in some PH1 [9]	–
Citrate	Inhibit calcium oxalate crystallization	May stabilize or improve renal function in some cases [69]	–
Liver transplant	Restore oxalate metabolism primarily in PH1 [9]	PH2 may not necessarily respond and no data in PH3 [9]	–
Lumasiran	RNAi of glycolate oxidase enzyme [70]	FDA approved—no long-term data on outcomes.	Single-arm study in advanced kidney disease ongoing—NCT04152200
Nedosiran	RNAi of LDH enzyme [72]	Trial ongoing in PH1 and PH2	NCT03847909
Secondary hyperoxalurias			–
High fluid intake	Lowers urinary calcium oxalate supersaturation [10]		–
EH			–
Increased calcium and low fat intake	Use calcium to bind oxalate in gut	Generally can lower urine oxalate in short term studies [10, 12]	–
Lower oxalate intake	decrease gut oxalate	Variable results [10, 12]	–
Citrate	Inhibit calcium oxalate crystallization	Only data is in stone patients with low urine citrate [10, 12]	–
Sevelamer	Fatty acid binding	Non-significant decrease in urine oxalate in single trial [76]	–
Cholestyramine	Decrease bile acids	Conflicting results [10, 12]	–
Microbiome manipulation	Increase oxalate degradation in gut	Have generally not been effective [64]	–
Reversal of bariatric surgery	Reverse malabsorption	Single case report with Roux-en-Y [79]
Reloxilase (ALLN-177)	Recombinant oxalate decarboxylase	Limited data—clinical trial ongoing [77]	NCT03847090
Cytokine/inflammasome inhibition	Block downstream inflammation leading to fibrosis	Animal studies only so far [80, 81]   Potentially also could be useful in PH and ingestions	–
Ingestions			–
Identify and remove offending agent from diet			–
EG			–
Ethanol	Competitively inhibits metabolism with alcohol dehydrogenase	Reduces formation of toxic metabolites [22]	–
Fomepizole	Competitively inhibits metabolism with alcohol dehydrogenase	Reduces formation of toxic metabolites [22]	–

FDA, Food and Drug Administration.

TRANSPLANT

There is a risk of both de novo and recurrent ON in renal transplants. One should consider the possibility of ON in any patient with unexplained graft dysfunction, especially if there is a risk factor for EH or a history of ON [1, 9, 10].

SUMMARY AND AREAS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION

In conclusion, ON is a serious condition that may be less uncommon than previously recognized. There is a high risk of progression to renal failure. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion in those with unexplained renal dysfunction as it is likely that early identification and treatment may afford a better outcome, as renal function at presentation appears to be a strong marker for prognosis.

Much remains to be better defined in this area. Why some patients with hyperoxaluria develop only ON, while others only nephrolithiasis and yet others both is not known. Whether one can use plasma oxalate levels (in patients with renal dysfunction) to non-invasively distinguish between PH, EH and non-hyperoxaluric kidney disease was the subject of a recent study [11] and needs to be further evaluated. The possible impact of antibiotic use as a cause or contributor to ON, via its effect on the intestinal biome, requires further study. The role of the SCL26 oxalate transporter family (present in both the gut and the kidney), in oxalate physiology as well as in the pathophysiology of hyperoxaluria needs further elucidation. These transporters may also potentially be targets in managing hyperoxaluric states. Therapies are being developed for both PH and EH, including the use of RNAi to target affected enzymes in PH, and recombinant oxalate decarboxylase in EH. The role of inflammation in ON, including by targeting the NLRP3-associated inflammasome, as well as inflammatory cytokines, is under investigation. This is an actively evolving field.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.