Literature DB >> 3514547

How technology is reframing the abortion debate.

D Callahan.   

Abstract

Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, medical and scientific developments have focused greater public and professional attention on the status of the fetus. Their cumulative effect may influence legal, social, and moral thought and set the stage for a change in public opinion and a challenge to legalized abortion. There is as yet no inexorable convergence of medical data and legal opinion that would undermine the rational of Roe v. Wade. But the prochoice movement must find room for an open airing of the moral questions if abortion is to remain what it should be--a legally acceptable act.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Right to Life Movement; Roe v. Wade; Abortion Law; Abortion, Induced; Americas; Anti-abortion Groups; Attitude; Behavior; Beliefs; Culture; Decision Making; Delivery Of Health Care; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Economic Factors; Ethics; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; Fetus; Health; Health Services; Interest Groups; Jurisprudence; Medicine--changes; North America; Northern America; Opposition To Family Planning; Philosophical Overview; Political Factors; Psychological Factors; Public Opinion; Social Change; Technology--changes; United States; Women's Status

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3514547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  6 in total

Review 1.  Feminist directions in medical ethics.

Authors:  V L Warren
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1992

2.  Eugenic abortion: an ethical critique.

Authors:  M N Beck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Ideal Positions: 3D Sonography, Medical Visuality, Popular Culture.

Authors:  Tim Seiber
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2016-03

4.  Walking a Fine Germline: Synthesizing Public Opinion and Legal Precedent to Develop Policy Recommendations for Heritable Gene-Editing.

Authors:  Shawna Benston
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions.

Authors:  Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  A Pill in the Lifeworld of Women in Burkina Faso: Can Misoprostol Reframe the Meaning of Abortion.

Authors:  Seydou Drabo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.