| Literature DB >> 3514547 |
Abstract
Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, medical and scientific developments have focused greater public and professional attention on the status of the fetus. Their cumulative effect may influence legal, social, and moral thought and set the stage for a change in public opinion and a challenge to legalized abortion. There is as yet no inexorable convergence of medical data and legal opinion that would undermine the rational of Roe v. Wade. But the prochoice movement must find room for an open airing of the moral questions if abortion is to remain what it should be--a legally acceptable act.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics and Reproduction; Right to Life Movement; Roe v. Wade; Abortion Law; Abortion, Induced; Americas; Anti-abortion Groups; Attitude; Behavior; Beliefs; Culture; Decision Making; Delivery Of Health Care; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Economic Factors; Ethics; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; Fetus; Health; Health Services; Interest Groups; Jurisprudence; Medicine--changes; North America; Northern America; Opposition To Family Planning; Philosophical Overview; Political Factors; Psychological Factors; Public Opinion; Social Change; Technology--changes; United States; Women's Status
Mesh:
Year: 1986 PMID: 3514547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hastings Cent Rep ISSN: 0093-0334 Impact factor: 2.683