Literature DB >> 35143530

Stakeholder perceptions of bird-window collisions.

Georgia J Riggs1, Omkar Joshi1, Scott R Loss1.   

Abstract

Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused avian mortality for which many mitigation and prevention options are available. However, because very little research has characterized human perspectives related to this issue, there is limited understanding about the most effective ways to engage the public in collision reduction efforts. To address this research need, we: (1) evaluated how two stakeholder groups, homeowners and conservation practitioners, prioritize potential benefits and obstacles related to bird-window collision management, (2) compared priorities between these groups, and (3) evaluated potential conflicts and collective strength of opinions within groups. We addressed these objectives by merging the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) survey approaches. Specifically, survey respondents made pairwise comparisons between strengths and weaknesses (respectively, direct outcomes and barriers related to management, such as fewer collisions and increased costs) and opportunities and threats (indirect outcomes and barriers, such as increased bird populations and fewer resources for other building-related expenses). Both homeowners and conservation practitioners ranked strengths and opportunities higher than weaknesses and threats, indicating they have an overall positive perception toward reducing bird-window collisions. However, key obstacles that were identified included costs of management and a lack of policy and guidelines to require or guide management. These results suggest that substantial advances can be made to reduce bird-window collisions because both homeowners and conservation practitioners had positive views, suggesting their receptivity toward collision management measures. However, because of more neutral views and conflicting responses within the homeowner group, results also highlight the importance of targeting homeowners with education materials that provide information about bird-window collisions and solutions that reduce them. Because bird-window collisions are a human-caused phenomenon, such information about human perspectives and priorities will be crucial to addressing this threat and thus benefitting bird populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35143530      PMCID: PMC8830717          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Understanding perceptions of stakeholder groups about Forestry Best Management Practices in Georgia.

Authors:  Chantal Tumpach; Puneet Dwivedi; Robert Izlar; Chase Cook
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Understanding public perceptions of risk regarding outdoor pet cats to inform conservation action.

Authors:  Ashley Gramza; Tara Teel; Susan VandeWoude; Kevin Crooks
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Threatened bird valuation in Australia.

Authors:  Kerstin K Zander; Gillian B Ainsworth; Jürgen Meyerhoff; Stephen T Garnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bird-building collision risk: An assessment of the collision risk of birds with buildings by phylogeny and behavior using two citizen-science datasets.

Authors:  K Samantha Nichols; Tania Homayoun; Joanna Eckles; Robert B Blair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nocturnal flight-calling behaviour predicts vulnerability to artificial light in migratory birds.

Authors:  Benjamin M Winger; Brian C Weeks; Andrew Farnsworth; Andrew W Jones; Mary Hennen; David E Willard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Factors influencing bird-building collisions in the downtown area of a major North American city.

Authors:  Scott R Loss; Sirena Lao; Joanna W Eckles; Abigail W Anderson; Robert B Blair; Reed J Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Window area and development drive spatial variation in bird-window collisions in an urban landscape.

Authors:  Stephen B Hager; Bradley J Cosentino; Kelly J McKay; Cathleen Monson; Walt Zuurdeeg; Brian Blevins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bird-Window Collisions: A Critical Animal Welfare and Conservation Issue.

Authors:  Daniel Klem
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.440

9.  Bird-Window Collisions at a West-Coast Urban Park Museum: Analyses of Bird Biology and Window Attributes from Golden Gate Park, San Francisco.

Authors:  Logan Q Kahle; Maureen E Flannery; John P Dumbacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stakeholder opinions on scientific forest management policy implementation in Nepal.

Authors:  Omkar Joshi; Rajan Parajuli; Gehendra Kharel; Neelam C Poudyal; Eric Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.