Yanjun Chen1,2, Xintao Zhang2, Mianwen Li2, Lijie Zhong2, Yukun Ding2, Yaru Zhang1, Xueting Du3, Xianfu Mo2, Jialing Chen2, Qianmin Chen2, Wenhua Huang1, Shizhen Zhong4, Xiaodong Zhang5. 1. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023, Shatai Road South, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. 2. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, No.183, Zhongshan Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 4. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023, Shatai Road South, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. zhszhnfso@126.com. 5. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, No.183, Zhongshan Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. ddautumn@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of fat fraction (FF) and T2* relaxation based on DIXON in the assessment of infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression in older adults. METHODS: Ninety volunteers (age range 51-70 years, 65 females) were enrolled in this study. Participants were grouped based on the Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KLG). The FF and T2* values were measured based on the 3D-modified DXION technique. Cartilage defects, bone marrow lesions, and synovitis were assessed based on a modified version of whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS). Knee pain was assessed by self-administered Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. The differences of FF and T2* measurement and the correlation with WORMS and WOMAC assessments were analyzed. Diagnostic efficiency was analyzed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 60 knees were finally included (n = 20 in each group). The values were 82.6 ± 3.7%, 74.7 ± 5.4%, and 60.5 ± 14.1% for FF is the no OA, mild OA, and advanced OA groups, and were 50.7 ± 6.6 ms, 44.1 ± 6.6 ms, and 39.1 ± 4.2 ms for T2*, respectively (all p values < 0.001). The WORMS assessment and WOMAC pain assessment showed negative correlation with FF and T2* values. The ROC showed the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for diagnosing OA were 0.93, 77.5%, and 100% using FF, and were 0.86, 75.0%, and 90.0% using T2*, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FF and T2* alternations in IFP are associated with knee structural abnormalities and clinical symptoms cross-sectionally and may have the potential to predict the severity of KOA. KEY POINTS: • Fat fraction (FF) and T2* relaxation based on DIXON imaging are novel methods to quantitatively assess the infrapatellar fat pad for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression in older adults. • The alterations of FF and T2* using mDIXON technique in IFP were associated with knee structural abnormalities and clinical symptoms. • FF and T2* alternations in IFP can serve as the new imaging biomarkers for fast, simple, and noninvasive assessment in KOA.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of fat fraction (FF) and T2* relaxation based on DIXON in the assessment of infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression in older adults. METHODS: Ninety volunteers (age range 51-70 years, 65 females) were enrolled in this study. Participants were grouped based on the Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KLG). The FF and T2* values were measured based on the 3D-modified DXION technique. Cartilage defects, bone marrow lesions, and synovitis were assessed based on a modified version of whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS). Knee pain was assessed by self-administered Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. The differences of FF and T2* measurement and the correlation with WORMS and WOMAC assessments were analyzed. Diagnostic efficiency was analyzed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 60 knees were finally included (n = 20 in each group). The values were 82.6 ± 3.7%, 74.7 ± 5.4%, and 60.5 ± 14.1% for FF is the no OA, mild OA, and advanced OA groups, and were 50.7 ± 6.6 ms, 44.1 ± 6.6 ms, and 39.1 ± 4.2 ms for T2*, respectively (all p values < 0.001). The WORMS assessment and WOMAC pain assessment showed negative correlation with FF and T2* values. The ROC showed the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for diagnosing OA were 0.93, 77.5%, and 100% using FF, and were 0.86, 75.0%, and 90.0% using T2*, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FF and T2* alternations in IFP are associated with knee structural abnormalities and clinical symptoms cross-sectionally and may have the potential to predict the severity of KOA. KEY POINTS: • Fat fraction (FF) and T2* relaxation based on DIXON imaging are novel methods to quantitatively assess the infrapatellar fat pad for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression in older adults. • The alterations of FF and T2* using mDIXON technique in IFP were associated with knee structural abnormalities and clinical symptoms. • FF and T2* alternations in IFP can serve as the new imaging biomarkers for fast, simple, and noninvasive assessment in KOA.