| Literature DB >> 35141255 |
Qi-Shun Geng1, Tao Huang2, Li-Feng Li3, Zhi-Bo Shen3, Wen-Hua Xue1, Jie Zhao1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer (THCA) is a malignancy affecting the endocrine system, which currently has no effective treatment due to a limited number of suitable drugs and prognostic markers.Entities:
Keywords: FN1; biomarker; immunity; survival; thyroid cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35141255 PMCID: PMC8818687 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.812278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes of GSE33630 (A), GSE58545 (B), and GSE60542 (C). Veen diagram of downregulated (D) and upregulated (E) common DEGs to three gene expression profiles.
Figure 2The Screening and identification of key genes. (A) PPI network constructed with the DEGs in biological progress. (B) The most significant module obtained from PPI network. (C) The top eight hub genes. The logrank analysis of hub genes (D) and the multivariate cox logistic regression analysis (E) of hub genes based on the TCGA database. (F) The significant kegg pathways of FN1 in THCA obtained by GSEA.
The information related to biological processes of statistical significance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0007155 | Cell adhesion | 1.61E-06 | PLXNC1, CYP1B1, CLDN10, MMRN1, CDH3, NCAM1, LAMB3, LYVE1, CDH16, SORBS2, COMP, ENTPD1, DPT, FN1 | 14 |
| GO:0007165 | Signal transduction | 0.012464 | GNA14, EDN3, CRABP1, RAP1GAP, KIT, HMGA2, LYVE1, TNFRSF11B, CXCL14, ANK2, TENM1, IGSF1, GDF15, PLAU | 14 |
| GO:0030198 | Extracellular matrix organization | 0.000814 | CSGALNACT1, TNFRSF11B, LAMB3, COL9A3, COL13A1, COMP, FN1 | 7 |
| GO:0010628 | Positive regulation of gene expression | 0.00353 | ANK2, KIT, HMGA2, CDH3, AGR2, CITED1, FN1 | 7 |
| GO:0008284 | Positive regulation of cell proliferation | 0.046698 | EDN3, TIAM1, TGFA, KIT, DPP4, FN1, TIMP1 | 7 |
| GO:0007596 | Blood coagulation | 0.046698 | SERPINA1, MMRN1, ENTPD1, PROS1, PAPSS2, PLAU | 6 |
| GO:0042060 | Wound healing | 0.046698 | TGFA, TFF3, CDH3, FN1, TIMP1 | 5 |
| GO:0002576 | Platelet degranulation | 0.046698 | SERPINA1, MMRN1, PROS1, FN1, TIMP1 | 5 |
| GO:0007399 | Nervous system development | 0.046698 | CSGALNACT1, CHRDL1, TENM1, BEX1, MPPED2 | 5 |
Hub genes with higher degree of connectivity.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| FN1 | Fibronectin 1 | 17 | UP |
| TIMP1 | TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 | 9 | UP |
| SERPINA1 | Serpin family A member 1 | 6 | UP |
| COMP | Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein | 5 | UP |
| PROS1 | Protein S (alpha) | 4 | UP |
| MMRN1 | Multimerin 1 | 4 | DOWN |
| KIT | KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase | 4 | DOWN |
| TNFRSF11B | TNF receptor superfamily member 11b | 4 | DOWN |
Figure 3Transcriptional expressions of FN1 significantly correlated with poor survival outcomes in THCA patients from TCGA cohort. (A) The expression of FN1 in different subtypes of THCA. (B) The expressions of FN1 in THCA patients from TCGA-THCA cohort, (C) The correlation between the expression of FN1 and PFS, (D) ROC curve with an AUC of 0.8971. Transcriptional expression of FN1 was significantly correlated with individual cancer stages (E) and promoter methylation (F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Comparison of clinical characteristics between low FN1 group and high FN1 group in THCA cohort.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Sample | 505 | 253 | 252 | |
| Age (Year) | ||||
| ≥60 | 118 | 62 | 56 | 0.544 |
| <60 | 387 | 191 | 196 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 366 | 182 | 184 | 0.786 |
| Male | 139 | 71 | 68 | |
| Clinical stage | ||||
| I | 287 | 136 | 151 | |
| II | 52 | 13 | 39 |
|
| III | 111 | 65 | 46 | |
| IV | 55 | 39 | 16 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| Yes | 227 | 84 | 143 | |
| No | 229 | 152 | 77 |
|
| Unknown | 49 | 17 | 32 | |
| Distant metastases | ||||
| Yes | 280 | 157 | 123 | |
| No | 9 | 3 | 6 |
|
| Unknown | 216 | 93 | 123 | |
| Location | ||||
| Left lobe | 176 | 89 | 87 | |
| Right lobe | 219 | 105 | 114 | 0.348 |
| Bilateral | 88 | 44 | 44 | |
| Isthmus | 22 | 15 | 7 | |
| Progression state | ||||
| Yes | 53 | 35 | 18 |
|
| No | 452 | 218 | 234 | |
P-values less than 0.05 are bold.
Univariate and Multivariate Cox logistic regression analysis of FN1 for predicting PFS in TCGA cohort (PFS, progression free survival; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas).
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (ref. <60) | 2.10 | 1.20~3.70 |
| 1.49 | 0.78~2.80 | 0.225 |
| Gender (ref. Male) | 0.58 | 0.33~1.00 | 0.055 | 0.69 | 0.39~1.20 | 0.211 |
| Clinical stage (ref. I–II) | 2.60 | 1.50~4.40 |
| 1.94 | 1.03~3.60 |
|
| Lymph node metastasis (ref. No) | 1.60 | 0.91~2.80 | 0.11 | 1.13 | 0.62~2.10 | 0.687 |
| Distant metastases (ref. No) | 1.50 | 0.88~2.60 | 0.13 | 1.65 | 0.95~2.90 | 0.076 |
| Location (ref. left and right lode) | 0.90 | 0.45~1.80 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.42~1.70 | 0.632 |
| FN1 expression (ref. low) | 1.90 | 1.10~3.40 |
| 1.83 | 1.01~3.30 |
|
P-values less than 0.05 are bold.
Figure 4Analysis of the potential genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with FN1 dysregulation. (A,B) The CNAs in FN1-high and low expression groups. (C) Analysis of CpG island methylation and abnormal FN1 expression using TCGA-THCA dataset. (D) Correlation between FN1 expression and CpG island methylation was performed. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5The correlation between FN1 and inflammatory activities. (A) The heatmap of immune infiltration analysis. (B) The coexpression between FN1 and the B7-CD28 ligand-receptor family. (C) The correlation between FN1, CD273, CD274, CD275, CD276, and B7-H4 in THCA cohort. The correlation between FN1 and CD276 analyzed by THCA datasets (D), TIMER (E), and GEPIA (F).
Figure 6Down-regulation of FN1 suppressed THCA cell migration and invasion in vitro. (A) qRT-PCR showing the efficient depletion of FN1 expression and the expression of CD276 in B-CPAP and KTC-1 cells compared with siNC transfection. Representative photo-images (left) and histograms (right) of the effect of siFN1 on the clone formation (B) and migration (D) of B-CPAP and KTC-1 cells. (C) The proliferative ability of B-CPAP and KTC-1 cells after transfection was evaluated by CCK-8 assay. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.
Figure 7The correlation between FN1 and CD276 in THCA. (A) Representative IHC staining of CD276 and FN1 in tumors and adjacent no-tumor tissues from THCA patients. (B) Representative IHC staining of CD276 in tumor tissues from FN1-high and low patient groups. IHC score of CD276 (C) and FN1 (D) in adjacent no-tumor tissues and tumor tissues form patients with THCA. (E) IHC score of CD276 in tumor tissues from FN1-high and low patient groups, *p < 0.05, **P < 0.01.