| Literature DB >> 35140902 |
Guangxuan Yan1,2, Jincai Yang2, Shibing Qin1, Peng Yin2, Aixing Pan2, Yong Hai2.
Abstract
We have analyzed the arch root morphology, nail placement accuracy, degree of arch deformity, and three-dimensional Cobb angle in patients with NF scoliosis by CT 3D reconstruction. Likewise, we have thoroughly examined arch root morphology, nail placement accuracy, degree of arch deformity, and three-dimensional Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis by CT 3D reconstruction. The results of the two groups were statistically analyzed and compared to assess the efficacy and other morphological differences between these groups. For this purpose, 276 patients with scoliosis, including 221 with idiopathic scoliosis and 16 with neurofibromatosis scoliosis, were treated in the hospital, which is from May 2008 to December 2016. The 16 patients with idiopathic scoliosis were matched with patients with neurofibromatosis, and the postoperative CT data were reconstructed in three dimensions, and the measurements included arch morphology, arch transverse diameter, arch-rib joint transverse diameter, three-dimensional coronal Cobb angle, and correction rate. The data of the two groups were statistically analyzed to compare the arch morphology, nail placement accuracy, and treatment effect between patients with NF and patients with AIS. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the differences between NF and AIS patients in terms of morphology, nail placement accuracy, and treatment outcome. The results showed that there were more severely deformed pedicles in NF patients than in idiopathic scoliosis, and the difference between them was statistically significant. Of the 142 screws placed in the NF group, 88 screws were in a good position, and the remaining 54 screws were misplaced.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35140902 PMCID: PMC8820859 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4229377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Three-dimensional Cobb measurement.
Figure 2Measurement of the internal diameter of vertebral arch and transverse diameter of vertebral arch and rib body.
Types and deformity rates of the thoracolumbar pedicle in various scoliosis (%).
| Side bend type | Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Deformity rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.61 | 37.53 | 8.92 | 7.08 | 1.83 | 55.39 | |
| 89.85 | 31.97 | 7.02 | 1.16 | 0 | 40.15 |
Figure 3Various types of pedicle morphology.
Comparison of pedicle deformity rate.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of two groups | 4.51 | 0.024 |
Figure 4CT shows right side nail placement level 0 and level 3 left side nail placement level 2.
Figure 5Transverse diameter of pedicle rib complex.
Evaluation of coronal efficacy in neurofibroma group.
| Number | Preoperative coronal Cobb angle ° | Postoperative Cobb angle ° | Postoperative correction rate% | Cobb angle at the last follow-up | Follow-up correction rate% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71 | 16 | 77.4 | 23 | 67.6 |
| 2 | 50 | 33 | 34 | 33 | 34 |
| 3 | 51 | 25 | 50.9 | 27 | 47 |
| 4 | 93 | 47 | 49.1 | 47 | 49.4 |
| 5 | 82 | 52 | 36.5 | 60 | 27.5 |
| 6 | 55 | 19 | 65.5 | 19 | 65.5 |
| 7 | 53 | 4 | 92.5 | 4 | 92.5 |
| 8 | 92 | 36 | 60.8 | 41 | 55.4 |
| 9 | 54 | 29 | 40.6 | 41 | 55.4 |
| 10 | 45 | 22 | 51.1 | 25 | 44.4 |
| 11 | 126 | 58 | 56.3 | 58 | 56.3 |
| 12 | 73 | 42 | 42.4 | 44 | 39.7 |
| 13 | 58 | 9 | 84.5 | 13 | 77.4 |
| 14 | 85 | 33 | 61.2 | 35 | 58.9 |
| 15 | 46 | 8 | 82.6 | 10 | 78.3 |
| 15 | 68.6 | 28.8 | 58.8 | 31.3 | 55.3 |
SPSS analysis of coronary curative effect in neurofibroma group.
| Paired sample test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pairwise difference | ||||||
| 95% confidence interval of the difference | ||||||
| Mean value | Standard deviation | Standard error of the mean | Lower limit | Upper limit |
| |
| For 1 preoperative Cobb angle, postoperative Cobb angle | 39.75000 | 14.30851 | 3.57713 | 35.15554 | 47.37446 | 11.11215 |
| For 2 preoperative Cobb angles, the last Cobb angle | 37.31250 | 13.66123 | 3.41531 | 30.03295 | 44.59205 | 10.92515 |
| For 3 postoperative cob angles, last Cobb angle | −2.43750 | 2.58118 | 0.64530 | −3.81291 | −1.06209 | −3.77715 |
| The postoperative correction rate of 4 cases, follow-up correction rate | 3.53750 | 3.42926 | 0.85732 | 1.71018 | 5.36482 | 4.12615 |
SPSS analysis of coronal efficacy in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
| Paired sample test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pairwise difference | ||||||
| 95% confidence interval of the difference | ||||||
| Mean value | Standard deviation | Standard error of the mean | Lower limit | Upper limit |
| |
| For 1 preoperative Cobb angle, postoperative Cobb angle | 39.06250 | 10.42733 | 2.60683 | 33.50617 | 44.61883 | 14.98515 |
| For 2 preoperative Cobb angles, the last Cobb angle | 37.37500 | 10.70125 | 2.67531 | 31.67271 | 43.07729 | 13.97015 |
| For 3 postoperative cob angles, last Cobb angle | −1.68750 | 1.74045 | 0.43511 | −2.61492 | −0.76008 | −3.87815 |
| The postoperative correction rate of 4 cases, follow-up correction rate | 0.776875 | 3.20369 | 0.80092 | 1.06062 | 4.47588 | 3.45715 |
Figure 6Milk coffee spot.
Figure 7Preoperative examination.