Literature DB >> 35140858

A Mid-term Comparison of the Functional Outcomes of Medial Pivot and Rotating Platform Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Indian Population.

Akash Shakya1, Vijay Singh1, Romit A Agrawal1, Ayush Sharma1, Nilesh Mangale1, Venkatramana Wadgave1, Ajay Jaiswal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both medial pivot (MP) and rotating platform (RP) mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been developed to better mimic the natural knee kinematics and femoral roll back in flexion. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the mid-term functional outcomes and range of motion (ROM) of MP and RP types of total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: 116 patients (mean age of 66.3 years) undergoing TKA (52 Medial pivot design and 64 Rotating Platform design) were evaluated retrospectively with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee score, knee society score (KSS) with its subgroups namely, Knee Score (KSKS) and Functional Score (KSFS) and forgotten joint score (FJS) at a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Range of motion (ROM) and tibiofemoral anatomic angle on the radiographs were also compared.
RESULTS: Mean ROM, WOMAC and KSKS improved significantly from pre-operative to postoperative knees in both the groups. There was, however, no significant difference between the two groups at the final follow-up. In contrast, mean KSFS score improved to 89.5 ± 8.1 in MP group and 86.3 ± 7.1 in RP Group (p = 0.025), while mean FJS was 85.6 ± 4.1 and 80.9 ± 5.4 in the MP and RP groups, respectively (p = < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes can be obtained using either a MP or RP knee joint in tricompartmental osteoarthritis of knee. The MP design scores better on the KSFS score and FJS than the RP-TKA. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Knee; Medial pivot; Mobile bearing; Osteoarthritis

Year:  2021        PMID: 35140858      PMCID: PMC8789967          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00472-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  31 in total

1.  An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics.

Authors:  V C Jones; D C Barton; D P Fitzpatrick; D D Auger; M H Stone; J Fisher
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.300

2.  Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the Medial Pivot knee and a posterior stabilised implant.

Authors:  David Shakespeare; Michael Ledger; Vera Kinzel
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Primitive results after medial-pivot knee arthroplasties: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Fan; Justin Tzung-Shian Hsieh; Ming-Shium Hsieh; Ying-Chieh Shih; Chian-Her Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics during deep flexion kneeling in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eiichi Nakamura; S A Banks; Azusa Tanaka; Akira Sei; Hiroshi Mizuta
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  No Differences Identified in Transverse Plane Biomechanics Between Medial Pivot and Rotating Platform Total Knee Implant Designs.

Authors:  Georgios I Papagiannis; Ilias M Roumpelakis; Athanasios I Triantafyllou; Ioannis N Makris; George C Babis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; Michelle Bardgett; David Weir; James Holland; Craig Gerrand; David J Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Knee arthroplasty with a medially conforming ball-and-socket tibiofemoral articulation provides better function.

Authors:  Fahad Hossain; Shelain Patel; Shin-Jae Rhee; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  No difference in clinical outcome between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Li; Qiang Wu; Guang-Zhi Ning; Shi-Qing Feng; Qiu-Li Wu; Yan Li; Yan Hao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Early outcome of TKA with a medial pivot fixed-bearing prosthesis is worse than with a PFC mobile-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term survivorship of a medial-pivot total knee system compared with other cemented designs in an arthroplasty registry.

Authors:  Barbara Bordini; Cristina Ancarani; David A Fitch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.