| Literature DB >> 35140558 |
Tonje H Stea1,2, Kristin Holvik3, Caroline S Bryntesen1, Janicke B Myhre4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Monitoring dietary habits is important in order to identify risk groups and as a basis for targeted public health initiatives.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; dietary habits; questionnaires; repeated cross-sectional studies; socio-demographic factors; time trends
Year: 2021 PMID: 35140558 PMCID: PMC8788659 DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v65.6262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Fig. 1Unadjusted mean consumption frequency (times per week) of salty and sweet snacks, sugar-sweetened beverages, and artificially sweetened beverages among Norwegian adolescents in 2016 and 2019.
Fig. 2Unadjusted mean consumption frequency (times per week) of vegetables, fruit, whole-grain bread, and fish among Norwegian adolescents in 2016 and 2019.
Mean and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) weekly consumption of healthy food items among Norwegian adolescents according to gender, parental education, and study year
| Variables | Total ( | Vegetables (times/week) | Fruit and berries (times/week) | Whole-grain bread (times/week) | Fish (times/week) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95% CI) |
| Mean (95% CI) |
| Mean (95% CI) |
| Mean (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Boy | 13,000 | 4.2 (4.1, 4.2) | 3.8 (3.8, 3.9) | 4.7 (4.7, 4.8) | 2.0 (1.9, 2.0) | ||||
| Girl | 12,626 | 4.9 (4.8, 4.9) | <0.001 | 4.8 (4.7, 4.9) | <0.001 | 4.6 (4.6, 4.7) | 0.036 | 1.9 (1.8, 1.9) | 0.001 |
|
| |||||||||
| Low | 4,148 | 4.1 (4.0, 4.1) | 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) | 4.2 (4.1, 4.3) | 1.8 (1.7, 1.9) | ||||
| Medium | 4,888 | 4.4 (4.3, 4.4) | 4.1 (4.1, 4.2) | 4.6 (4.5, 4.7) | 1.9 (1.8, 1.9) | ||||
| High | 12,911 | 4.9 (4.8, 4.9) | <0.001 | 4.6 (4.6, 4.7) | <0.001 | 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) | <0.001 | 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||||
| 2016 | 13,418 | 4.7 (4.6, 4.7) | 4.4 (4.4, 4.5) | 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) | 2.3 (2.2, 2.3) | ||||
| 2019 | 12,801 | 4.4 (4.3, 4.4) | <0.001 | 4.2 (4.2, 4.3) | <0.001 | 4.2 (4.2, 4.3) | <0.001 | 1.6 (1.6, 1.6) | <0.001 |
Differences between categories of gender, education and study year were tested using general linear models.
Mean and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) weekly consumption of unhealthy food items among Norwegian adolescents according to gender, parental education, and study year
| Variables | Total ( | Salty snacks (times/week) | Sweets (times/week) | Sugar-sweetened beverages (times/week) | Artificially sweetened beverages (times/week) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95% CI) |
| Mean (95% CI) |
| Mean (95% CI) |
| Mean (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| |||||||||
| Boy | 13,000 | 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) | 2.1 (2.0, 2.1) | 2.9 (2.9, 2.9) | 1.9 (1.9, 1.9) | ||||
| Girl | 12,626 | 1.9 (1.9, 2.0) | 0.001 | 2.2 (2.2, 2.3) | <0.001 | 2.5 (2.4, 2.5) | <0.001 | 1.8 (1.7, 1.8) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||||
| Low | 4,148 | 2.1 (2.1, 2.2) | 2.3 (2.2, 2.3) | 3.1 (3.0, 3.2) | 2.0 (1.9, 2.1) | ||||
| Medium | 4,888 | 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) | 2.2 (2.1, 2.2) | 2.9 (2.8, 2.9) | 2.0 (1.9, 2.0) | ||||
| High | 12,911 | 1.9 (1.9, 2.0) | <0.001 | 2.1 (2.1, 2.1) | <0.001 | 2.5 (2.5, 2.5) | <0.001 | 1.8 (1.7, 1.8) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||||
| 2016 | 13,418 | 2.1 (2.1, 2.1) | 2.3 (2.3, 2.4) | 2.8 (2.8, 2.9) | 2.2 (2.1, 2.2) | ||||
| 2019 | 12,801 | 1.9 (1.9, 1.9) | <0.001 | 2.0 (1.9, 2.0) | <0.001 | 2.6 (2.5, 2.6) | <0.001 | 1.5 (1.5, 1.6) | <0.001 |
Differences between categories of gender, education and study year were tested using general linear models.
Mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) weekly consumption of healthy food items in 2016 and 2019, respectively among Norwegian adolescents according to gender and parental education
| Variables | Vegetables |
| Fruit and berries |
| Whole-grain bread |
| Fish |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2019 | 2016 | 2019 | 2016 | 2019 | 2016 | 2019 | |||||
| Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 4.3 (4.2, 4.4) | 4.1 (4.1, 4.2) | 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) | 3.9 (3.8, 4.0) | 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) | 4.4 (4.3, 4.5) | 2.3 (2.3, 2.4) | 1.7 (1.6, 1.7) | ||||
|
| 5.1 (5.0, 5.2) | 4.8 (4.7, 4.9) | 0.056 | 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) | 4.8 (4.7, 4.9) | 0.012 | 5.2 (5.1, 5.3) | 4.2 (4.1, 4.3) | 0.005 | 2.2 (2.2, 2.3) | 1.6 (1.6, 1.7) | 0.209 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 4.2 (4.0, 4.3) | 3.9 (3.8, 4.1) | 4.0 (3.9, 4.1) | 3.8 (3.7, 3.9) | 4.7 (4.6, 4.9) | 3.7 (3.5, 3.8) | 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) | 1.4 (1.3, 1.5) | ||||
|
| 4.5 (4.4, 4.6) | 4.2 (4.1, 4.3) | 4.2 (4.1, 4.3) | 4.1 (3.9, 4.2) | 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) | 4.1 (4.0, 4.3) | 2.2 (2.1, 2.2) | 1.6 (1.5, 1.6) | ||||
|
| 5.0 (4.9, 5.1) | 4.7 (4.7, 4.8) | 0.779 | 4.7 (4.6, 4.8) | 4.6 (4.5, 4.7) | 0.301 | 5.4 (5.3, 5.5) | 4.6 (4.5, 4.7) | 0.055 | 2.4 (2.3, 2.4) | 1.7 (1.7, 1.8) | 0.052 |
Interactions between 1) study year x gender, and 2) study year x parental education, analysed using general linear models.
Mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) weekly consumption of unhealthy food items in 2016 and 2019, respectively among Norwegian adolescents according to gender and parental education
| Variables | Salty snacks |
| Sweets |
| Sugar-sweetened beverages |
| Artificially sweetened beverages |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2019 | 2016 | 2019 | 2016 | 2019 | 2016 | 2019 | |||||
| Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 2.1 (2.1, 2.2) | 1.9 (1.9, 2.0) | 2.3 (2.2, 2.3) | 1.9 (1.8, 1.9) | 3.1 (3.0, 3.1) | 2.7 (2.7, 2.8) | 2.3 (2.2, 2.3) | 1.6 (1.5, 1.6) | ||||
|
| 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) | 1.9 (1.8, 1.9) | 0.717 | 2.4 (2.3, 2.4) | 2.1 (2.0, 2.1) | 0.117 | 2.6 (2.5, 2.7) | 2.4 (2.3, 2.4) | 0.225 | 2.1 (2.0, 2.2) | 1.5 (1.4, 1.6) | 0.070 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 2.2 (2.2, 2.3) | 2.0 (1.9, 2.1) | 2.4 (2.4, 2.5) | 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) | 3.2 (3.1, 3.4) | 2.9 (2.8, 3.0) | 2.4 (2.3, 2.5) | 1.6 (1.5, 1.7) | ||||
|
| 2.1 (2.0, 2.2) | 1.9 (1.9, 2.0) | 2.4 (2.3, 2.5) | 2.0 (1.9, 2.0) | 3.0 (2.9, 3.1) | 2.7 (2.6, 2.8) | 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) | 1.6 (1.5, 1.7) | ||||
|
| 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) | 1.8 (1.8, 1.9) | 0.323 | 2.3 (2.2, 2.3) | 2.0 (1.9, 2.0) | 0.040 | 2.6 (2.6, 2.7) | 2.4 (2.3, 2.5) | 0.126 | 2.1 (2.0, 2.2) | 1.5 (1.4, 1.5) | 0.064 |
Interactions between 1) study year x gender, and 2) study year x parental education, analysed using general linear models.
Background characteristics of included participants by study year
| Variables | 2016 | 2019 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13,412 | 12,801 | |
|
| 6,318 (49.1) | 6,308 (49.4) | 0.589 |
|
| |||
| Low | 2,302 (20.2) | 1,866 (17.6) | |
| Medium | 2,627 (23.1) | 2,261 (21.4) | |
| High | 6,449 (56.7) | 6,462 (61.0) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| 8th grade | 3,132 (24.3) | 3,125 (25.4) | |
| 9th grade | 3,105 (24.1) | 3,033 (24.6) | |
| 10th grade | 3,223 (25.0) | 2,943 (23.9) | |
| 11th grade | 3,436 (26.6) | 3,210 (26.1) | 0.053 |
Differences in gender, grade and parental education were analysed using the X test.
Low educated, if none of the parents had any higher education; medium educated, if one of the parents had higher education; and high educated, if both parents had higher education.
Grades 8–10 cover the age range 14–16 years, and grade 11 covers the age range 16–17 years.