| Literature DB >> 35140525 |
Hun-Young Park1,2, Won-Sang Jung2, Sung-Woo Kim2, Kiwon Lim1,2,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The present study verified the effects of interval training under hypoxia, a novel exercise modality for health promotion, on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and arterial and hemorheological function in healthy women.Entities:
Keywords: arterial endothelial function; arterial stiffness; erythrocyte deformability and aggregation; heart rate variability; hypoxia; interval training; maximal oxygen uptake
Year: 2022 PMID: 35140525 PMCID: PMC8818981 DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S344233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Womens Health ISSN: 1179-1411
Figure 1CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flow diagram.
Characteristics of the Participants
| Variables | INT | IHT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (n) | n = 10 | n = 10 | - | - |
| Environmental condition (mmHg) | Sea level (760 mmHg) | 3000-m simulated altitude (526 mmHg) | - | - |
| Age (year) | 24.5±3.8 | 25.2±4.0 | −0.398 | 0.695 |
| Height (cm) | 164.8±0.9 | 163.2±3.9 | 1.243 | 0.243 |
| Weight (kg) | 52.0±3.4 | 51.2±4.7 | 0.409 | 0.687 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.1±1.2 | 19.2±1.6 | −0.140 | 0.890 |
| FFM (kg) | 35.6±2.3 | 35.5±3.2 | 0.057 | 0.955 |
| Percent body fat (%) | 20.7±0.9 | 20.6±1.1 | 0.090 | 0.929 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 108.9±11.0 | 108.2±10.6 | 0.145 | 0.886 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 66.1±8.6 | 65.3±7.9 | 0.217 | 0.831 |
| VO2max (mL/kg/min) | 49.7±4.6 | 49.4±4.3 | 0.131 | 0.897 |
Note: Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: INT, interval normoxic training; IHT, interval hypoxic training; BMI, body mass index; FFM, free fat mass; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 2Study design.
Changes in Body Composition Before and After Training at Each Environmental Condition
| Variables | INT (n = 10) | Cohen’s d | IHT (n = 10) | Cohen’s d | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Time | Group | Interaction | |||
| Weight (kg) | 52.0 ±3.4 | 51.7 ±3.3 | −0.07 (−0.90, 0.78) | 51.2 ±4.7 | 51.1 ±4.4 | −0.03 (−0.87, 0.81) | 0.057 (0.187) | 0.697 (0.009) | 0.659 (0.011) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.1 ±1.2 | 19.0 ±1.1 | −0.07 (−0.91, 0.77) | 19.2 ±1.6 | 19.2 ±1.6 | 0.00 (−0.83, 0.84) | 0.191 (0.093) | 0.829 (0.003) | 0.119 (0.130) |
| FFM (kg) | 35.6 ±2.3 | 35.4 ±2.4 | −0.07 (−0.90, 0.78) | 35.5 ±3.2 | 35.5 ±3.2 | 0.00 (−0.84, 0.84) | 0.539 (0.021) | 1.000 (0.000) | 0.590 (0.016) |
| Percent body fat (%) | 20.7 ±0.9 | 20.6 ±0.8 | −0.09 (−0.93, 0.75) | 20.6 ±1.1 | 20.4 ±1.4 | −0.15 (−0.99, 0.70) | 0.150 (0.112) | 0.806 (0.003) | 0.476 (0.029) |
Note: Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: INT, interval normoxic training; IHT, interval hypoxic training; BMI, body mass index; FFM, free fat mass; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Changes in ANS function before and after training at each environmental condition. (A) Change in the RMSSD. (B) Change in LF. (C) Change in HF. (D) Change in LF/HF ratio. †p < 0.05, significant interaction or main effect. *p < 0.05, significant difference between before and after training at each environmental condition.
Figure 4Changes in arterial stiffness, arterial endothelial function, and hemorheological function before and after training at each environmental condition. (A) Change in baPWV. (B) Change in FMD. (C) Change in RBC deformability. (D) Change in RBC aggregation. †p < 0.05, significant interaction or main effect. *p < 0.05, significant difference before and after training at each environmental condition.
Figure 5Changes in VO2max before and after training at each environmental condition. †p < 0.05, significant interaction or main effect. *p < 0.05, significant difference before and after training at each environmental condition.