| Literature DB >> 35140256 |
Fuzhang Wang1, Shafiq Ahmad2, Qasem Al Mdallal3, Maha Alammari4, Muhammad Naveed Khan4, Aysha Rehman5.
Abstract
The under-consideration article mainly focuses an unsteady three-dimensional Maxwell bio-convective nanomaterial liquid flow towards an exponentially expanding surface with the influence of chemical reaction slip condition. The feature of heat transport is achieving in the existenceof convective boundary condition and variable thermal conductivity. With the help of similarity variables, the flow form of equations is turned into a nonlinear form of coupled ODEs. The numerical solutions are calculated by adopting bvp4c function of MATLAB. Impact of distinct characteristics on the temperature, velocity microorganism and concentration field is graphically evaluated. Moreover, physical quantities are observed via graphs and tabulated data in details. It has been seen by the observation that the involvement of unsteadiness parameter restricts the change of laminar to turbulent flow. Further, for increasing velocity slip parameter velocity component in both directions shows lessening behavior. The Nusselt number exhibits diminishing behavior for larger values of Deborah number, and it shows the opposite behavior for larger values of convective parameter.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35140256 PMCID: PMC8828818 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-04948-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Physical picture of the paper.
Previous studies comparison of values, when .
| Nadeem et al.[ | Presents results | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.809400 | 0.809401 | |
| 1.000000 | 1.000000 | |
| 1.923682 | 1.923683 | |
| 3.720673 | 3.720674 | |
| 12.29408 | 12.29409 |
Table of , , and for different parameters when
| 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.3722 | 0.2898 | 1.600 |
| 0.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.4124 | 0.2327 | 1.8440 |
| 0.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.4249 | 0.2155 | 1.9620 |
| 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | – | 0.3 | – | – | 0.4249 | 0.2155 | 1.9620 |
| – | 0.7 | – | 2.5 | – | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.4279 | 0.2114 | 1.9970 |
| – | 0.9 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.4307 | 0.2076 | 2.030 |
| 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | – | 0.3 | – | – | 0.4276 | 0.2119 | 1.9930 |
| – | – | 0.3 | 2.5 | – | – | 1.5 | 0.4249 | 0.2155 | 1.9620 |
| 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | – | – | 0.3 | – | 0.4235 | 0.2174 | 1.9460 |
| – | – | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | – | – | 0.4119 | 0.2334 | 2.004 |
| 0.3 | – | – | 3.0 | – | 0.3 | – | 0.4350 | 0.2019 | 1.9280 |
| – | – | – | 4.0 | – | – | 1.5 | 0.4498 | 0.1820 | 1.8770 |
| – | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 0.2 | – | – | 0.4283 | 0.1406 | 1.8620 |
| 0.3 | – | – | – | 0.4 | – | – | 0.4215 | 0.2936 | 2.0740 |
| – | – | – | – | 0.6 | – | 1.5 | 0.4145 | 0.4595 | 2.3340 |
| – | 0.5 | 0.3 | – | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | 0.6466 | 2.5910 | |
| 0.3 | – | – | 2.5 | – | 0.3 | – | 0.2155 | 1.9620 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | 0.5 | – | 0.1293 | 1.8520 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8700 | ||
| – | – | – | – | 0.3 | – | 1.5 | 1.9620 | ||
| 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0580 |
Figure 2Variation in and for .
Figure 3Variation in and for .
Figure 4Variation in and for .
Figure 5Variation in for and .
Figure 6Variation in for and .
Figure 7Variation in and for .
Figure 8Variation in for and for
Figure 9Variation in for and
Figure 10Variation in for and .
Figure 11Variation in for and .
Figure 12Variation of Nusselt number, Sherwood number and microorganism number for distinct parameters.