| Literature DB >> 35139894 |
Katherine W Turk1,2,3, Alexandra Geada4, Victor E Alvarez1,2,3,5, Weiming Xia1,5, Jonathan D Cherry1,2,3, Raymond Nicks1,5, Gaoyuan Meng2,5, Sarah Daley1,5, Yorghos Tripodis6, Bertrand R Huber1,2,3, Andrew E Budson1,2,3, Brigid Dwyer3,7, Neil W Kowall1,2,3, Robert C Cantu1,8,9,10,11, Lee E Goldstein1,12,13,14, Douglas I Katz3,7, Robert A Stern1,3,8,10, Michael L Alosco1,3, Jesse Mez1,3, Ann C McKee1,2,3,5,14, Thor D Stein15,16,17,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau and beta-amyloid levels in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a disease which can be clinically indistinguishable from Alzheimer's disease (AD), are largely unknown. We examined postmortem CSF analytes among participants with autopsy confirmed CTE and AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid beta; Biomarkers; Cerebrospinal fluid; Chronic traumatic encephalopathy; Tau
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35139894 PMCID: PMC8830027 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-00976-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Impact factor: 6.982
Demographic and exposure characteristics of participant groups
| No CTE/No AD | Low CTE | High CTE | Low AD | Int/High AD | CTE+AD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | 18 | 43 | 23 | 56 | 11 | ||
| 74.1 (3.0)d | 64.6 (4.6)f,d,e | 74.8 (1.3)d | 86.7 (1.1)a,b,c | 81.1 (1.3)b | 79.6 (2.8)b | <.001 | |
| 101–17 | 89–25 | 90–53 | 95–72 | 98–54 | 70–100 | ||
| FHS | 13 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 1 | |
| UNITE | 17 | 17 | 43 | 1 | 12 | 10 | |
| HOPE | 11 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 31 | 0 | |
| Sex m/f (%male) | 33/8 (80.5%)c,e | 18/0 (100%)e | 43/0 (100%)a,d,e | 14/9 (60.9%)c | 27/29 (48.2%) a,b,c | 10/1 (90.9%) | <.001 |
| Stage I | 0 | 6 (33.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (9.1%) | |
| Stage II | 0 | 12 (66.7%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (9.1%) | |
| Stage III | 0 | 0 | 18 (41.9%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stage IV | 0 | 0 | 25 (58.1%) | 0 | 0 | 9 (81.8%) | |
| 0 | 15 (36.6%) | 7 (38.9%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| I-II | 12 (29.3%) | 5 (27.8%) | 4 (9.3%) | 6 (26.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| III-IV | 14 (34.1%) | 5 (27.8%) | 31 (72.1%) | 17 (73.9%) | 7 (12.5%) | 1 (9.1%) | |
| V-VI | 0 | 1 (5.6%) | 7 (16.3%) | 0 | 49 (87.5%) | 10 (90.9%) | |
| 0 | 41 (100%) | 14 (77.8%) | 21 (48.8%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 4 (22.2%) | 22 (51.2%) | 22 (95.7%) | 8 (14.3%) | 1 (9.1%) | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (4.3%) | 26 (46.4%) | 6 (54.5%) | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 (39.3%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
| 10 (27.7%)d,e | 5 (27.8%)d,e | 6 (14.6%) | 0 (0%)a,b | 3 (5.4%)a,b | 2 (18.2%) | <.05 | |
| 9 (25%) | 5 (27.8%) | 6 (14.6%) | 0 | 2 (4.3%) | 2 (18.2%) | ||
| 1 (2.7%) | 5 (27.8%) | 4 (9.8%) | 0 | 2 (4.3%) | 1 (9%) | ||
| 36 | 18 | 41 | 15 | 46 | 11 | ||
| 0.31 | |||||||
| Brainstem | 2 (4.4%) | 1 (5.6%) | 6 (14%) | 2 (13.3%) | 2 (4.34%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Limbic/neocortical | 4 (9.8%) | 2 (11.1%) | 10 (23.3%) | 1 (6.6%) | 8 (17.4%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
| | 36 | 18 | 43 | 15 | 46 | 11 | |
| Yes 12 (29.2%) | Yes 17 (94.4%) | Yes 43 (100%) | Yes 0 | Yes 9 (16%) | Yes 10 (90%) | .013 | |
| No 2 (4.8%) | No 0 | No 0 | No 1 (4%) | No 1 (1.7%) | No NA | ||
| Missing 27 (70.7%) | Missing 1 (5.6%) | Missing 0 | Missing 22 (96%) | Missing 46 (82%) | Missing 1 (9.1%) | ||
| 481.0 (106.6) | 648.3 (261.2) | 465.1 (106.5) | 555.6 (183.6) | 386.5 (93.1) | 370.5 (192.7) | 0.85 | |
| 36 | 11 | 33 | 23 | 49 | 11 | ||
| 23.2 (3.15)b 16.82–29.56 | 46.6 (6.34)a,d,e 33.2–59.99 | 33.88(3.02)e 27.77–39.98 | 21.40 (3.85)b 13.43–29.37 | 20.70 (2.31)b,c 16.1–25.32 | 24.99 (4.05) 15.98–34.0 | <.001 | |
| 40 | 18 | 42 | 23 | 56 | 11 | ||
| 80.5.00–1.75 | 101.00–5.5 | 96.00–2.00 | 96.00–5.83 | 99.15–1.75 | 48.00–3.00 | ||
| 6.2 (0.2) 35 | 5.76 (0.5) 16 | 5.6 (0.2) 31 | 5.7 (0.5) 12 | 5.8 (0.2) 39 | 4.7 (0.4) 10 | 0.15 | |
| 6.14 (0.08) 26 | 6.14 (0.10) 14 | 6.17 (0.1) 24 | 6.07 (0.13) 11 | 6.08 (0.06) 36 | 5.97 (0.8) 6 | 0.83 | |
Data are presented mean with standard error of the (S.E.M.), years for age at death, and contact sports exposure and as #yes/#no (%) unless otherwise indicated
CERAD plaque density was rated as none (0), sparse (1), moderate (2), or frequent (3) for neuritic plaques
Int/High intermediate/high, AD Alzheimer disease, CERAD Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease, CTE chronic traumatic encephalopathy, FTLD frontotemporal lobar degeneration, LBD Lewy body disease, RIN RNA integrity number
aDifferent from no CTE/no AD (p <.05, Bonferroni corrected)
bDifferent from low CTE (p <.05, Bonferroni corrected)
cDifferent from high CTE (p <.05, Bonferroni corrected)
dDifferent from low AD (p <.05, Bonferroni corrected)
eDifferent from intermediate/high AD (p <.05, Bonferroni corrected)
fDifferent from CTE+AD (p <.05, Bonferroni corrected)
#ANOVA with Bonferroni correction
*χ2 test for proportions between all pathology groups
Fig. 1A p-tau181, B p-tau231, C total tau, D Aβ1-42, and E Aβ1-40 for no CTE/no AD (control), low CTE, and low AD groups. Scatter plots show individual values, median, and interquartile range (25–75%) as bars, *p< 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons; Kruskal-Wallis test
Fig. 2A p-tau181, B p-tau231, C total tau, D Aβ1-42, and E Aβ1-40 for high CTE, intermediate/high AD, and CTE+AD groups. Scatter plots show individual values, median, and interquartile range (25–75%) as bars, *p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons; Kruskal-Wallis test
CSF predictors of CTE pathology versus no CTE/no AD (control)
| OR | 95% Confidence Interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| p-tau231 (U/10μL) | 1.53 | 1.08–2.16 | 0.016 |
| Aβ1-42 (pg/100μL) | 0.35 | 0.17–0.74 | 0.006 |
Binary logistic regression comparing CTE all stages with no CTE/no AD (control) group while adjusting for age and sex (n=77)
CSF predictors of CTE versus AD pathology
| OR | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| p-tau231 (U/10μL) | 1.34 | 1.02–1.76 | 0.036 |
| Aβ1-42 (pg/100μL) | 0.51 | 0.28–0.91 | 0.022 |
| Age of death | 0.91 | 0.84–0.97 | 0.006 |
Binary logistic regression comparing CTE all stages with AD all stages adjusting for age and sex (n=111)
Fig. 3Diagnostic accuracy of A p-tau231, Aβ1-42, age at death, sex for CTE vs. no CTE/no AD (control) diagnosis (n= 77) and B p-tau231, Aβ1-42, age at death, and sex were predictive of CTE vs. AD (n= 111). AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI confidence interval