| Literature DB >> 35139888 |
Lucas Guillo1,2, Fanny Grimaud3, Fanny Houser4, Caroline Prost5, Elisabeth Jouve6, Cécile Philandrianos7, Maxime Abellan7, Julie Veran3, Carine Visee8, Laura Beyer-Berjot8, Ariadne Desjeux4, Françoise Dignat-George9, Marc Leone10, Jean-Charles Grimaud4,11, Florence Sabatier3,9, Mélanie Serrero4, Jérémy Magalon3,9.
Abstract
Perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease are frequent and disabling, with a major impact on patients' quality of life. Cell-based therapy using mesenchymal stem cells represents new hope for these patients, but long-term efficacy remains challenging. In a pilot study, including patients with refractory complex perianal fistulas, autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (ADSVF) combined with microfat achieved combined remission in 60% of cases, with a good safety profile at 1 year. The purpose of this study is to assess whether these results were maintained at longer term. The safety and efficacy data of the ten patients were evaluated retrospectively 3 years after injection on the basis of clinical and radiological data. MRI were analysed according to the MAGNIFI-CD score. No adverse event was attributed to the experimental stem-cell treatment. Combined remission was achieved in 7 patients (70%) and associated with a significant improvement in the MAGNIFI-CD MRI score. In conclusion, the safety and efficacy of ADSVF and microfat injection in Crohn's disease fistulas were maintained at 3 years, demonstrating that this innovative strategy is effective in producing a long-lasting healing effect. The ongoing multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial (NCT04010526) will be helpful to define the place for this approach in the current therapeutic arsenal.Entities:
Keywords: Crohn’s disease; Long-term outcome; Perianal fistulas; Stromal vascular fraction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35139888 PMCID: PMC8827195 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-02738-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Patients and disease characteristics at baseline
| Characteristics at baseline | |
|---|---|
| Men | 6 (60%) |
| Age (year) | 37.3 ± 12.8 |
| Active smoker | 3 (30%) |
| Non-smoker | 3 (30%) |
| Former smoker | 4 (40%) |
| BMI† | 24.4 ± 5 |
| CD‡ duration (year) | 11.8 ± 11.4 |
| CDAI§ score | 139 ± 116 |
| SIBDQ†† score | 43 ± 12 |
| Fistula duration (year) | 5.2 ± 4.9 |
| PDAI‡‡ score | 7.3 ± 2.7 |
| 1 | 4 (40%) |
| 2 | 5 (50%) |
| > 2 | 1 (10%) |
| Intersphincteric | 1 (10%) |
| Trans-sphincteric | 8 (80%) |
| Suprasphincteric | 0 (0%) |
| Extrasphincteric | 1 (10%) |
| History of fistula surgery | 10 (100%) |
| At least 1 anti-TNFα§§ (± IS†††) | 10 (100%) |
| 2 anti-TNFα | 8 (80%) |
| Vedolizumab | 3 (30%) |
| Derivation ileostomy | 2 (20%) |
| Anti-TNFα | 7 (70%) |
| Vedolizumab | 3 (30%) |
Data represent frequency n (%) or mean and standard deviation
† Body Mass Index
‡ Crohn’s Disease
§ Crohn’s Disease Activity Index
†† Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire
‡‡ Perianal Crohn's Disease Activity Index
§§ Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha
††† Immunosuppressant
Adverse and intercurrent events at 3 years
| Events | |
|---|---|
| Perianal pain | 4 (40%) |
| Local inflammation | 4 (40%) |
| New fistula tract | 1 (10%) |
| 3 (30%) | |
| 1 | 2 (20%) |
| > 1 | 1 (10%) |
| Luminal surgery | 2 (20%) |
| 4 (40%) | |
| Drainage with setons | 3 (30%) |
| Fistulotomy | 1 (10%) |
| Change of biotherapy | 2 (20%) |
| 4 (40%) | |
| 1 | 2 (20%) |
| > 1 | 2 (20%) |
| Antibiotic therapy | 2 (20%) |
| Steroids | 0 (0%) |
Study outcomes over time
| Study outcomes | Baseline | 1 year | 3 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined remission | 6 (60%) | 7 (60%) | |
| Response* | 2 (20%) | 0 (0%) | |
| No response | 2 (20%) | 3 (30%) | |
| PDAI score† | 7.3 ± 2.7 | 3.4 ± 4.3 | 7.2 ± 5.2 |
| SIBDQ score‡ | 43.4 ± 11.9 | 47.0 ± 11.4 | 49.0 ± 13.2 |
Data represent frequency n (%) or mean and standard deviation
†Perianal Crohn's Disease Activity Index
‡Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire
*Clinical improvement in suppuration but without reach combined remission outcome
Fig. 1Efficacy results at 1 year and 3 years