Literature DB >> 35139541

Integrating landmark modeling framework and machine learning algorithms for dynamic prediction of tuberculosis treatment outcomes.

Maryam Kheirandish1, Donald Catanzaro2, Valeriu Crudu3,4, Shengfan Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish an informative dynamic prediction model of treatment outcomes using follow-up records of tuberculosis (TB) patients, which can timely detect cases when the current treatment plan may not be effective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 122 267 follow-up records from 17 958 new cases of pulmonary TB in the Republic of Moldova. A dynamic prediction framework integrating landmark modeling and machine learning algorithms was designed to predict patient outcomes during the course of treatment. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated to evaluate performance of the model at critical time points. New measures were defined to determine when follow-up laboratory tests should be conducted to obtain most informative results.
RESULTS: The random-forest algorithm performed better than support vector machine and penalized multinomial logistic regression models for predicting TB treatment outcomes. For all 3 outcome classes (ie, cured, not cured, and died after 24 months following treatment initiation), sensitivity and PPV of prediction models improved as more follow-up information was collected. Specifically, sensitivity and PPV increased from 0.55 to 0.84 and from 0.32 to 0.88, respectively, for the not cured class.
CONCLUSION: The dynamic prediction framework utilizes longitudinal laboratory test results to predict patient outcomes at various landmarks. Sputum culture and smear results are among the important variables for prediction; however, the most recent sputum result is not always the most informative one. This framework can potentially facilitate a more effective treatment monitoring program and provide insights for policymakers toward improved guidelines on follow-up tests.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  follow-up studies; mortality; supervised machine learning; treatment outcome; tuberculosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35139541      PMCID: PMC9006704          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  11 in total

1.  Landmark Linear Transformation Model for Dynamic Prediction with Application to a Longitudinal Cohort Study of Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Yayuan Zhu; Liang Li; Xuelin Huang
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 1.864

2.  Personalized dynamic prediction of death according to tumour progression and high-dimensional genetic factors: Meta-analysis with a joint model.

Authors:  Takeshi Emura; Masahiro Nakatochi; Shigeyuki Matsui; Hirofumi Michimae; Virginie Rondeau
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Improved dynamic predictions from joint models of longitudinal and survival data with time-varying effects using P-splines.

Authors:  Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou; Paul H C Eilers; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Dimitris Rizopoulos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.

Authors:  G S Collins; J B Reitsma; D G Altman; K G M Moons
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Importance-aware personalized learning for early risk prediction using static and dynamic health data.

Authors:  Qingxiong Tan; Mang Ye; Andy Jinhua Ma; Terry Cheuk-Fung Yip; Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Pong C Yuen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Systematic review of prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in adults.

Authors:  Lauren S Peetluk; Felipe M Ridolfi; Peter F Rebeiro; Dandan Liu; Valeria C Rolla; Timothy R Sterling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Dynamic models to predict health outcomes: current status and methodological challenges.

Authors:  David A Jenkins; Matthew Sperrin; Glen P Martin; Niels Peek
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2018-12-18

8.  Continual updating and monitoring of clinical prediction models: time for dynamic prediction systems?

Authors:  David A Jenkins; Glen P Martin; Matthew Sperrin; Richard D Riley; Thomas P A Debray; Gary S Collins; Niels Peek
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2021-01-11

9.  A Clinical Prediction Model for Unsuccessful Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Lauren S Peetluk; Peter F Rebeiro; Felipe M Ridolfi; Bruno B Andrade; Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos; Afranio Kritski; Betina Durovni; Solange Calvacante; Marina C Figueiredo; David W Haas; Dandan Liu; Valeria C Rolla; Timothy R Sterling
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 20.999

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic Risk Prediction via a Joint Frailty-Copula Model and IPD Meta-Analysis: Building Web Applications.

Authors:  Takeshi Emura; Hirofumi Michimae; Shigeyuki Matsui
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.