| Literature DB >> 35139341 |
Yanjun Su1, Shaohao Cheng1, Chang Diao1, Yunhai Ma1, Jun Qian1, Ruochuan Cheng2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2015, American Thyroid Association (ATA) issued the first version of Management Guidelines for Children with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the ATA pediatric guidelines recommended surgical approach for the patient can be applied to surgical treatment of pediatric PTC in China.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Papillary thyroid cancer; Surgery; Thyroid carcinoma; Treatment
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35139341 PMCID: PMC9432047 DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.11.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pediatr (Rio J) ISSN: 0021-7557 Impact factor: 2.990
Patients’ characteristics.
| Characteristics | No. of patients | % |
|---|---|---|
| Pathological type | ||
| Classical PTC | 50 | 92.59% |
| Diffuse sclerosing variant | 3 | 5.55% |
| Insular variant | 1 | 1.85% |
| Multifocality | ||
| Single | 37 | 68.52% |
| Multiple (≥2) | 17 | 31.48% |
| Tumor location | ||
| Unilateral | 40 | 74.07% |
| Left lobe | 23 | 42.59% |
| Right lobe | 17 | 31.48% |
| Bilateral | 14 | 25.93% |
| Tumor size | ||
| ≤ 1 cm | 13 | 21.07% |
| > 1, ≤ 2 cm | 17 | 31.48% |
| > 2, ≤ 4 cm | 21 | 38.89 |
| > 4 cm | 3 | 5.56% |
| Extrathyroidal extension | ||
| Yes | 23 | 42.59% |
| No | 31 | 57.41% |
| T classification | ||
| T1 | 22 | 40.74% |
| T1a | 8 | 14.81% |
| T1b | 14 | 25.93% |
| T2 | 9 | 16.67% |
| T3 | 14 | 25.93% |
| T3a | 1 | 1.85% |
| T3b | 13 | 24.07% |
| T4a | 9 | 16.67% |
| T4a | 9 | 16.67% |
| T4b | 0 | 0 |
| N classification | ||
| N0 | 9 | 16.67% |
| N1a | 45 | 83.33% |
| N1b | 34 | 62.96% |
| M classification | ||
| M0 | 50 | 92.59% |
| M1 | 4 | 7.41% |
For N classification, N0 no any evidence of regional lymph node metastasis; N1a and N1b were proved pathologically.
For M classification, M0 no any evidence of distant metastasis; M1 was confirmed by Rx-WBS.
Relationship between LNM rate and T stage.
| T-stage | N | CLNM [n/%] | LLNM [n/%] | LNM [n/%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 22 | 14/63.64% | 8/36.36% | 14/63.64% |
| T1a | 8 | 3/37.50% | 2/25.00% | 3/37.50% |
| T1b | 14 | 11/78.57% | 6/42.86% | 11/78.57% |
| T2 | 9 | 8/88.89% | 5/55.56% | 8/88.89% |
| T3 | 14 | 14/100.00% | 12/85.71% | 14/100.00% |
| T3a | 1 | 1/100.00% | 1/100.00% | 1/100.00% |
| T3b | 13 | 13/100.00% | 11/84.61% | 13/100.00% |
| T4 | 9 | 9/100.00% | 9/100.00% | 9/100.00% |
| T4a | 9 | 9/100.00% | 9/100.00% | 9/100.00% |
| T4b | 0 | — | — | — |
| Total | 54 | 45/83.33% | 34/62.96% | 45/83.33% |
Compared with CLNM rate, χ = 5.704, p = 0.017.
Relationship between clinical N stage, surgical approaches and LNM.
| ClinicalN Stage | Surgical approaches | N | CLNM [n/%] | LLNM [n/%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral | Contralateral | Ipsilateral | Contralateral | LNM (+) [%] | |||
| cN1b (-) | CND | 20 | 11/55.00% | 4/20.00% | —- | —- | 11/55.00% |
| Unilateral CND | 10 | 5/50.00% | — | —- | —- | ||
| Bilateral CND | 10 | 6/60.00 | 4/40.00% | —- | —- | ||
| cN1b (+) | LND | 34 | 34/100.00% | 27/79.41% | 34/100.00% | 17/50.00% | 34/100.00% |
| Unilateral LND | 17 | 17/100.00% | 12/70.59% | 17/100.00% | —- | ||
| Bilateral LND | 17 | 17/100.00% | 15/88.24% | 17/100.00% | 17/100.00% | ||
| Total | 54 | 45/83.33% | 31/57.41% | 34/62.96% | 17/31.48% | ||
In patients with bilateral lesions, the larger side of the tumor is regarded as ipsilateral and the smaller side of the lesion as contralateral.
2 patients underwent TT with unilateral CND.
2 patients underwent lobectomy with bilateral CND.
Including 2 patients for subsequent operation developed from cN1b (-) LND includes SSLND and SLND.
Compared with LNM in cN1b (-) patients, p = 0.000.
Compared with contralateral CLNM, p = 0.003.
Compared with contralateral LLNM, p = 0.001.
Lymph node metastasis rate in different levels of lateral neck.
| LLNM [n/%] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level II | Level III | Level IV | Level V | ||||||
| LND | side | II | IIa | IIb | V | Va | Vb | ||
| SSLND (III-IV) | 6 | —- | —- | —- | 5 | 5 | —- | —- | —- |
| SSLND (II-IV) | 11 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 8 | —- | —- | —- |
| SLND (II-V) | 34 | 31 | 26 | 18 | 33 | 29 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| Total | 51 | 37 | 32 | 21 | 47 | 42 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
Compred with LLNM rate in level V, p = 0.000.
Compred with LLNM rate in level III, p = 0.009. (Pathological findings from the second surgery were included in the analysis).