Ryan H Moy1,2,3, Henry S Walch4, Marissa Mattar5, Walid K Chatila4,6,7, Daniela Molena8, Vivian E Strong8, Laura H Tang9, Steven B Maron1, Daniel G Coit8, David R Jones8, Jaclyn F Hechtman9, David B Solit1,4, Nikolaus Schultz4,6,10, Elisa de Stanchina5, Yelena Y Janjigian1,2. 1. Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 3. Present address: Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. 4. Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 5. Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 6. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 7. Tri-Institutional Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 8. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 9. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 10. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling has defined key oncogenic drivers and distinct molecular subtypes in esophagogastric cancer; however, the number of clinically actionable alterations remains limited. To establish preclinical models for testing genomically driven therapeutic strategies, we generated and characterized a large collection of esophagogastric cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We established a biobank of 98 esophagogastric cancer PDX models derived from primary tumors and metastases. Clinicopathologic features of each PDX and the corresponding patient sample were annotated, including stage at diagnosis, treatment history, histology, and biomarker profile. To identify oncogenic DNA alterations, we analyzed and compared targeted sequencing performed on PDX and parent tumor pairs. We conducted xenotrials in genomically defined models with oncogenic drivers. RESULTS: From April 2010 to June 2019, we implanted 276 patient tumors, of which 98 successfully engrafted (35.5%). This collection is enriched for PDXs derived from patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (62 models, 63%), the majority of which were refractory to standard therapies including trastuzumab. Factors positively correlating with engraftment included advanced stage, metastatic origin, intestinal-type histology, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positivity. Mutations in TP53 and alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases (ERBB2 and EGFR), RAS/PI3K pathway genes, cell-cycle mediators (CDKN2A and CCNE1), and CDH1 were the predominant oncogenic drivers, recapitulating clinical tumor sequencing. We observed antitumor activity with rational combination strategies in models established from treatment-refractory disease. CONCLUSION: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center PDX collection recapitulates the heterogeneity of esophagogastric cancer and is a powerful resource to investigate mechanisms driving tumor progression, identify predictive biomarkers, and develop therapeutic strategies for molecularly defined subsets of esophagogastric cancer.
PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling has defined key oncogenic drivers and distinct molecular subtypes in esophagogastric cancer; however, the number of clinically actionable alterations remains limited. To establish preclinical models for testing genomically driven therapeutic strategies, we generated and characterized a large collection of esophagogastric cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We established a biobank of 98 esophagogastric cancer PDX models derived from primary tumors and metastases. Clinicopathologic features of each PDX and the corresponding patient sample were annotated, including stage at diagnosis, treatment history, histology, and biomarker profile. To identify oncogenic DNA alterations, we analyzed and compared targeted sequencing performed on PDX and parent tumor pairs. We conducted xenotrials in genomically defined models with oncogenic drivers. RESULTS: From April 2010 to June 2019, we implanted 276 patient tumors, of which 98 successfully engrafted (35.5%). This collection is enriched for PDXs derived from patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (62 models, 63%), the majority of which were refractory to standard therapies including trastuzumab. Factors positively correlating with engraftment included advanced stage, metastatic origin, intestinal-type histology, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positivity. Mutations in TP53 and alterations in receptor tyrosine kinases (ERBB2 and EGFR), RAS/PI3K pathway genes, cell-cycle mediators (CDKN2A and CCNE1), and CDH1 were the predominant oncogenic drivers, recapitulating clinical tumor sequencing. We observed antitumor activity with rational combination strategies in models established from treatment-refractory disease. CONCLUSION: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center PDX collection recapitulates the heterogeneity of esophagogastric cancer and is a powerful resource to investigate mechanisms driving tumor progression, identify predictive biomarkers, and develop therapeutic strategies for molecularly defined subsets of esophagogastric cancer.
Authors: Yelena Y Janjigian; Steven B Maron; Walid K Chatila; Brittanie Millang; Shweta S Chavan; Carly Alterman; Joanne F Chou; Michal F Segal; Marc Z Simmons; Parisa Momtaz; Marina Shcherba; Geoffrey Y Ku; Alice Zervoudakis; Elizabeth S Won; David P Kelsen; David H Ilson; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Ryan N Ptashkin; Mark T A Donoghue; Marinela Capanu; Barry S Taylor; David B Solit; Nikolaus Schultz; Jaclyn F Hechtman Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Seung Tae Kim; Kyung Kim; Hyuk Lee; Iwanka Kozarewa; Jeeyun Lee; Peter G S Mortimer; Justin I Odegaard; Elizabeth A Harrington; Juyoung Lee; Taehyang Lee; Sung Yong Oh; Jung-Hun Kang; Jung Hoon Kim; Youjin Kim; Jun Ho Ji; Young Saing Kim; Kyoung Eun Lee; Jinchul Kim; Tae Sung Sohn; Ji Yeong An; Min-Gew Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim; Jae J Kim; Yang Won Min; Byung-Hoon Min; Nayoung K D Kim; Sally Luke; Young Hwa Kim; Jung Yong Hong; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; AmirAli Talasaz; Simon J Hollingsworth; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Won Ki Kang Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: E Izumchenko; K Paz; D Ciznadija; I Sloma; A Katz; D Vasquez-Dunddel; I Ben-Zvi; J Stebbing; W McGuire; W Harris; R Maki; A Gaya; A Bedi; S Zacharoulis; R Ravi; L H Wexler; M O Hoque; C Rodriguez-Galindo; H Pass; N Peled; A Davies; R Morris; M Hidalgo; D Sidransky Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Anne-Lise Peille; Vincent Vuaroqueaux; Swee-Seong Wong; Jason Ting; Kerstin Klingner; Bruno Zeitouni; Manuel Landesfeind; Woo Ho Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Seong-Ho Kong; Isabella Wulur; Steven Bray; Peter Bronsert; Nina Zanella; Greg Donoho; Han-Kwang Yang; Heinz-Herbert Fiebig; Christoph Reinhard; Amit Aggarwal Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2020-07-09
Authors: Georgios Vlachogiannis; Somaieh Hedayat; Alexandra Vatsiou; Yann Jamin; Javier Fernández-Mateos; Khurum Khan; Andrea Lampis; Katherine Eason; Ian Huntingford; Rosemary Burke; Mihaela Rata; Dow-Mu Koh; Nina Tunariu; David Collins; Sanna Hulkki-Wilson; Chanthirika Ragulan; Inmaculada Spiteri; Sing Yu Moorcraft; Ian Chau; Sheela Rao; David Watkins; Nicos Fotiadis; Maria Bali; Mahnaz Darvish-Damavandi; Hazel Lote; Zakaria Eltahir; Elizabeth C Smyth; Ruwaida Begum; Paul A Clarke; Jens C Hahne; Mitchell Dowsett; Johann de Bono; Paul Workman; Anguraj Sadanandam; Matteo Fassan; Owen J Sansom; Suzanne Eccles; Naureen Starling; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Sottoriva; Simon P Robinson; David Cunningham; Nicola Valeri Journal: Science Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 47.728