OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of our repair technique using autologous pericardial patches for active infective endocarditis with extensive mitral valve destruction. METHODS: From 2009 through 2016, 12 patients with extensive mitral leaflet destruction due to infective endocarditis underwent mitral valve repair with an autologous pericardial patch. Mid-term clinical outcomes and echocardiographic findings of these patients were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: The perioperative mortality rate was 8.3% (1/12). Postoperatively, the mitral regurgitation grade was ≤ 1 + in all patients. During 5.0 ± 3.2 years of follow-up, there was no recurrence of infective endocarditis or death. There were no cases of mitral regurgitation grade > + 1 and pressure gradient > 5 mmHg during follow-up among 6 patients who underwent posterior leaflet reconstruction, whereas elevation of the pressure gradient was observed in patients who underwent reconstruction of two areas of the anterior leaflet and survived up till the follow-up phase among 3 patients who underwent anterior leaflet repair. The mitral regurgitation grade worsened and pressure gradient was elevated during the follow-up phase in the 2 patients who underwent bi-leaflet repair, and reoperation was performed. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve reconstruction using autologous pericardial patch is a useful treatment option for extensive mitral valve destruction due to active infective endocarditis. Our clinical data revealed that good mid-term results were obtained for posterior leaflet lesions, while extensive anterior leaflet and bi-leaflet lesion repair did not yield satisfactory results. The indication for surgical repair should be carefully evaluated when an extensive anterior region is involved.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of our repair technique using autologous pericardial patches for active infective endocarditis with extensive mitral valve destruction. METHODS: From 2009 through 2016, 12 patients with extensive mitral leaflet destruction due to infective endocarditis underwent mitral valve repair with an autologous pericardial patch. Mid-term clinical outcomes and echocardiographic findings of these patients were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: The perioperative mortality rate was 8.3% (1/12). Postoperatively, the mitral regurgitation grade was ≤ 1 + in all patients. During 5.0 ± 3.2 years of follow-up, there was no recurrence of infective endocarditis or death. There were no cases of mitral regurgitation grade > + 1 and pressure gradient > 5 mmHg during follow-up among 6 patients who underwent posterior leaflet reconstruction, whereas elevation of the pressure gradient was observed in patients who underwent reconstruction of two areas of the anterior leaflet and survived up till the follow-up phase among 3 patients who underwent anterior leaflet repair. The mitral regurgitation grade worsened and pressure gradient was elevated during the follow-up phase in the 2 patients who underwent bi-leaflet repair, and reoperation was performed. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve reconstruction using autologous pericardial patch is a useful treatment option for extensive mitral valve destruction due to active infective endocarditis. Our clinical data revealed that good mid-term results were obtained for posterior leaflet lesions, while extensive anterior leaflet and bi-leaflet lesion repair did not yield satisfactory results. The indication for surgical repair should be carefully evaluated when an extensive anterior region is involved.