Literature DB >> 35137034

Reply to Royse et al.

Daniel J F M Thuijs1, Piroze Davierwala2,3,4, Milan Milojevic1,5, Salil V Deo6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary bypass grafting; SYNTAXES; long-term; multiple arterial grafting; survival; venous grafts

Year:  2022        PMID: 35137034      PMCID: PMC9525003          DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.534


× No keyword cloud information.
We highly appreciate the interest expressed by colleagues Royse et al. in our recently published manuscript [1] and acknowledge their constructive remarks. Our study determined to evaluate long-term survival differences between multiple arterial grafting (MAG) versus single arterial grafting (SAG) in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting [1]. At 12.6 years follow-up, MAG resulted in markedly lower all-cause death compared to an SAG strategy [23.6% vs 40.0%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval (0.55–0.98); P = 0.038]. Royse et al. hypothesized that the significant survival advantage of MAG could be reflected by the reduced number of venous grafts used in the MAG cohort (52.7%) versus the SAG cohort (98.4%). In the SAG cohort, 1.6% of patients (n = 16) underwent single-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting, which was performed with either a single left internal mammary artery graft or a single radial artery graft (table 2 in the main manuscript). Therefore, the MAG cohort was divided into 2 (unmatched) subgroups: (i) patients with total arterial revascularization (TAR, e.g. those without a venous graft) versus (ii) patients without TAR (e.g. those with a venous graft; No-TAR). At 12.6 years of follow-up, no difference in survival outcome was noted between TAR vs No-TAR by Kaplan–Meier analysis [all-cause death: 23.9% vs 23.0%, respectively; unadjusted hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval (0.72–1.58); P = 0.75]. Although previous publications have reported reduced patency in venous grafts compared to arterial grafts [2, 3], no difference in survival between groups was observed. Moreover, in the presence of durable arterial grafts to the left anterior descending artery, it remains unclear whether reduced patency rates in conduits to non-left anterior descending vessels translate to clinically meaningful survival differences. More data are needed to truly understand the possible detrimental impact of venous conduits in the presence of more than 1 arterial graft.
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system.

Authors:  Joseph F Sabik; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone; Penny L Houghtaling; Delos M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  B W Lytle; F D Loop; D M Cosgrove; N B Ratliff; K Easley; P C Taylor
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts.

Authors:  Daniel J F M Thuijs; Piroze Davierwala; Milan Milojevic; Salil V Deo; Thilo Noack; A Pieter Kappetein; Patrick W Serruys; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Marie-Claude Morice; Michael J Mack; L Elisabeth G E Ståhle; Niels J Verberkmoes; David R Holmes; Stuart J Head
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.191

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.