| Literature DB >> 35136538 |
Zhaopeng Zheng1, Shanshan Liang2, Shasha Sun3, Pengfei Liu4, Ling Yu5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical observation of salvianolic acid combined with panax notoginseng saponins combined with basic nursing intervention on cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats and its effects on the expression of apoptosis-related proteins Bcl-2, Bax and caspase-3.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35136538 PMCID: PMC8818411 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8706730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Comparison of neurological deficit scores of rats in each group. ∗p<0. 01 vs sham; ∗∗p < 0.01 vs I/R; #p < 0.01 vs SA or PNS.
Figure 2Comparison of infarct volume of rat brain tissue in each group. ∗p < 0.05 vs sham; ∗∗p<0.01 vs I/R; #p < 0.01 vs SA or PNS.
Comparison of p-53 and NF-κB protein expression in brain tissue around infarcted focus of rats in each group.
| Group |
| p-53 | NF- |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 12 | 0.53±0.24 | 0.36±0.12 |
| Eda | 12 | 0.98±0.28 | 0.93±0.24 |
| I/R | 12 | 1.56±0.47 | 1.45±0.23 |
| SA | 12 | 1.31±0.36 | 1.24±0.28 |
| PNS | 12 | 1.28±0.33 | 1.26±0.31 |
| SA+PNS | 12 | 0.92±0.22 | 0.88±0.17 |
|
| 12.334 | 14.652 | |
|
| 7.421 | 6.710 | |
|
| 10.106 | 8.634 | |
|
| 0.783 | 0.537 | |
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | |
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | |
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | |
|
| >0.05 | >0.05 |
t 0, P0, sham vs I/R; t1, P1, I/R vs SA; t2, P2, SA vs SA+PNS; t3, P3, Eda vs SA+PNS.
Effects of SA combined with PNS on brain index and water content of rats in each group.
| Group | n | Brain index (g/100 g) | Wet weight (g) | Dry weight (g) | Water content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 12 | 0.48 ± 0.023 | 0.652 ± 0.021 | 0.147 ± 0.004 | 69.21 ± 2.23 |
| Eda | 12 | 0.52 ± 0.025∗∗ | 0.683 ± 0.028 | 0.148 ± 0.006 | 73.65 ± 3.12∗∗ |
| I/R | 12 | 0.63 ± 0.036∗ | 0.722 ± 0.036 | 0.150 ± 0.007 | 82.04 ± 3.24∗ |
| SA | 12 | 0.58 ± 0.032∗∗ | 0.706 ± 0.032 | 0.149 ± 0.005 | 77.81 ± 2.47∗∗ |
| PNS | 12 | 0.59 ± 0.031∗∗ | 0.702 ± 0.033 | 0.149 ± 0.006 | 78.23 ± 2.66∗∗ |
| SA+PNS | 12 | 0.54 ± 0.026∗∗△ | 0.675 ± 0.031 | 0.148 ± 0.004 | 72.14 ± 2.82∗∗△ |
∗P < 0.05 vs sham, ∗∗P < 0.01 vs I/R, △P < 0.05 vs SA or PNS
Figure 3The effects of SA+PNS on the activities of MDA, SOD, GSH-Px and T-AOC in brain tissue (a) Comparison of MDA content in the brain tissue of each group of rats. (b) Comparison of the SOD content in the brain tissue of each group of rats. (c) Comparison of the GSH-Px content in the brain tissue of each group of rats. (d) Comparison of T-AOC content in the brain tissue of each group of rats. ∗p < 0.05 vs Sham; ∗∗p < 0.01 vs I/R; #p < 0.01 vs SA or PNS.
Figure 4The effect of SA+PNS on the expression of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and IL-1β in the brain tissue of each group of rats. (a) Comparison of the expression level of IL-6 in the brain tissue of each group. (b) Comparison of the expression level of IL-8 in the brain tissue of each group. (c) Comparison of the expression level of TNF-α in the brain tissue of each group. (d) Comparison of IL-1β expression levels in the brain tissue of rats in each group. ∗p < 0. 05 vs sham; ∗∗p < 0. 01 vs I/R; #p < 0. 01 vs SA or PNS. The effects on the levles of Bcl-2, Bax and Caspase-3 in rats.
Figure 5The effect of Danshen combined with Panax notoginseng on the expression of Bcl-2 protein, Bax protein and Caspase-3 protein in each group of rats. (a) Comparison of Bcl-2 protein expression levels of rats in each group. (b) Comparison of Bax protein expression levels of rats in each group. (c) Comparison of Caspase-3 protein expression levels of rats in each group. ∗p < 0.05 vs sham; ∗∗p < 0.01 vs I/R; #p < 0.01 vs SA or PNS.