Literature DB >> 35136535

The need to combat stigmatizing dogmas in the midst of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.

Anthonio Oladele Adefuye1, Markes Butler2, Henry Ademola Adeola3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; access to healthcare; health education; health-seeing behaviour; stigma

Year:  2020        PMID: 35136535      PMCID: PMC8819457          DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2021.1419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Afr        ISSN: 2038-9922


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Stigmatization is a putative structural barrier to health-seeking behaviour, and radical education of the populace is crucial to ameliorate its detrimental effects. Even before the classic work of Erving Goffman in 19631 on the social psychology of stigma, the practice of fear and avoidance because of the presence of a disease, in particular infectious diseases[2] and in some cases noninfectious disease[3] has been in existence in many societies. Similarly, infectious disease stigmatization – a standardized image of the disgrace of certain people that is held in common by community at large, on account of being ill by an infectious disease[4] – has co-existed with human nature both in the pre- and post-modern era.[5] At present, the ongoing novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created fear and anxiety in many communities globally and this has led to the widespread resurgence of social stigmatization. Instances of prejudice, racial discrimination, the rise of anti-foreigner sentiments and the blaming of certain groups of people for the spread of COVID-19 has been documented in many parts of the world.[6-8] Intracommunity discrimination and selfimposed isolation have also been reported in some instances where members of a community demanded that roadblocks be placed between them and another part of the community where COVID-19 cases have been diagnosed. The economic hardship precipitated by the prolonged lockdown regulations and social distancing fatigue has quickly transformed the initial positive sentiments enjoyed by healthcare workers, other first responders and COVID-19 survivors to resentment, social stigma and discrimination. [9-11] Healthcare providers and emergency COVID-19 frontline responders, once celebrated as heroes in many parts of the world,[10] are now being stigmatized, experiencing rejection, denial of access to facility and harassment from the stigmatizing society.[12,13] This may have far-reaching psychological effects on these groups of workers critical in combating this pandemic, as seen in many COVID-19 survivors, who now report having emotional distress from stigma, shame, guilt and anger, and require additional supportive psychotherapy. [12-14] Furthermore, propagation of COVID- 19 stigmatization has been facilitated by social media and information technology platforms, and many incidents of COVID- 19 stigmatization have been reported on most social media platforms.[8] It is plausible that the continuum of preventive care within the context of the current reality should include keeping COVID-19-negative individuals uninfected, while securing optimal care outcomes for those who are positive. However, the self-sabotaging effect of COVID-19 stigmatization can be significant and offers no benefit to public health efforts, as it precipitates harmful behavioural changes such as self or community denial, hiding the illness to avoid discrimination, not disclosing history of recent travel, and unwillingness to seek medical intervention or advice at an early stage of infection. From an enlightened public health management point of view, unbalancing the delicate trade-off between the civil rights of the infected person and that of the rest of the populace poses a potential barrier to providing robust communal health programmes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stigmas have been reported to change the environment in which infectious disease pathogens exist, allowing the pathogen to create more havoc than without stigmas in place.[5] This suggest that ongoing COVID-19 stigmatization will not increase our ability to survive the pandemic but rather act as a driver of problematic disease dynamics, undermine governmental efforts to curtail spread and act as a catalyst for failures in protecting public health. Hence, concerted effort should be made to stop the dogma of COVID-19 stigma and prevent stigma-promoting communication. Information technology and social media platforms should be deployed constructively to create stigma-free and ethical contact tracing apps, as well as telemedicine consultation for patients in remote areas, inter alia. Not least, educating all stakeholders (government, society, infected individuals, patient relatives, caregivers and other first responders) would ameliorate the counterproductive aftermath of COVID-19 stigmatization (a list of do’s and don’ts can be found here: https://www.who. int/docs/ default-source/coronaviruse/covid19-stigma- guide.pdf). Above all, governments, policy-makers and citizens must avoid dehumanizing and demoralizing comments and policies.
  11 in total

1.  Infectious Disease Stigmas: Maladaptive in Modern Society.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; David Hughes
Journal:  Commun Stud       Date:  2014-04

2.  Impact of socio-economic development, contact and peer counselling on stigma against persons affected by leprosy in Cirebon, Indonesia –a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Dadun; Wim H Van Brakel; Ruth M H Peters; Mimi Lusli; Marjolein B M Zweekhorst; Joske G F Bunders
Journal:  Lepr Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.537

3.  Stigma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sanjeet Bagcchi
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  COVID-19 and stigma: Social discrimination towards frontline healthcare providers and COVID-19 recovered patients in Nepal.

Authors:  Rakesh Singh; Madhusudan Subedi
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-06-13

Review 5.  Psychosocial impact of COVID-19.

Authors:  Souvik Dubey; Payel Biswas; Ritwik Ghosh; Subhankar Chatterjee; Mahua Jana Dubey; Subham Chatterjee; Durjoy Lahiri; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-05-27

6.  Anti-Asian sentiment in the United States - COVID-19 and history.

Authors:  H Alexander Chen; Jessica Trinh; George P Yang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  'Healthcare Heroes': problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Caitríona L Cox
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Lived experiences of the corona survivors (patients admitted in COVID wards): A narrative real-life documented summaries of internalized guilt, shame, stigma, anger.

Authors:  Swapnajeet Sahoo; Aseem Mehra; Vikas Suri; Pankaj Malhotra; Lakshmi Narayana Yaddanapudi; Goverdhan Dutt Puri; Sandeep Grover
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-05-30

9.  Racism and discrimination in COVID-19 responses.

Authors:  Delan Devakumar; Geordan Shannon; Sunil S Bhopal; Ibrahim Abubakar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Protecting our healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Haley Ehrlich; Mark McKenney; Adel Elkbuli
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.