| Literature DB >> 35136312 |
Vinicius Gustavo Petronilho1, Ísis de Fátima Balderrama2, Leonel Alves de Oliveira3, Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz1, Marcos Giovanetti Zubek4, Vilmar Divanir Gottardo1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the mechanical resistance of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane when submitted to resistance traction on longitudinal axis. Blood collection of a healthy individual was collected with an amount of 300 mL and divided into 30 tubes containing 10 mL each one. The samples were divided into three groups, according to the g-force protocols: (1) F200 g: (2) F400 g; (3) F800 g. Membranes of each g-force group were divided into subgroups, according to waiting time after centrifugation: (T0) immediate use and (T30) use after 30 min. Considering these intervals of time, the concentrate was removed from tubes and inserted in a PRF metallic box to confection of the membrane. The PRF membranes were submitted to mechanical tension on a universal testing machine and obtained to a resistance force of each membrane. The centrifugation time showed no statistically significant difference for membrane resistance for any force applied (P > 0.05; Student's t-test). For T0 group results demonstrated no influence for membrane resistance (P = 0.357; Student's t-test), therefore T30 showed statistically significant difference (P = 0.040; Student's t-test) for membrane resistance for centrifugation forces applied, with highest value when applied greatest force. The findings suggest that the waiting time for centrifugation could be determined according to demand of application, and for immediate use of the membrane, the centrifugation did not influence the resistance, on the other hand, after 30 min, the application of higher force resulted in a membrane with considerable resistance. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Centrifugation; dental implants; platelet-rich fibrin; protocols; resistance traction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35136312 PMCID: PMC8796778 DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_782_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Indian Soc Periodontol ISSN: 0972-124X
Figure 1Centrifuge obtained to perform the processing of samples with different forces evaluated (FibrinFUGE 25, Montserrat®)
Figure 2Paper support developed to evaluate the membrane attached into longitudinal axis
Figure 3Device developed to fix the sample-support on the universal testing machine
Figure 4(a) Membrane with traction; (b) Zoom of membrane with traction; (c) Membrane after rupture due the traction force applied
Figure 5Leukocytes platelet-rich fibrin membrane after rupture with high magnification by Scanning Electron Microscope. (a) ×50; (b) ×1000; (c) ×2500 *Note the fibrin network
Figure 6Leukocytes platelet-rich fibrin membrane after rupture (specifically the buffy coat area) with high magnification by Scanning Electron Microscope. (a) ×50; (b) ×1000; (c) ×2500
The values of the resistance force groups (mean±standard deviation)
| Groups | F200 | F400 | F800 |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 991.65±164.39 | 1.109.10±115.97 | 1.148.36±229.64 |
| T30 | 996.39±225.06a | 1.130.43±297.27a, b | 1.313.91±64.97b |
Different lower case letters on the same line indicate significant differences with significance level of 5% (student’s t-test). T0 – Immediate use (time); T30 – Use after 30 min (time); F200 – g-force of 200 m/s2; F400 – g-force of 400 m/s2; F800 – g-force of 800 m/s2