| Literature DB >> 35136090 |
Donghoon Han1, Si-Hyuck Kang2, Chang-Hwan Yoon3, Tae-Jin Youn2, In-Ho Chae2.
Abstract
Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury accelerates myocardial injury sustained during the myocardial ischemic period and thus abrogates the benefit of reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We investigated the efficacy of intracoronary ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) administration as an adjunctive treatment to coronary intervention to reduce IR injury in a swine model. We occluded the left anterior descending artery for 1 h. From the time of reperfusion, we infused 50 mL of EDTA-based chelating agent via the coronary artery in the EDTA group and normal saline in the control group. IR injury was identified by myocardial edema on echocardiography. Tetrazolium chloride assay revealed that the infarct size was significantly lower in the EDTA group than in the control group, and the salvage percentage was higher. Electron microscopy demonstrated that the mitochondrial loss in the cardiomyocytes of the infarcted area was significantly lower in the EDTA group than in the control group. Echocardiography after 4 weeks showed that the remodeling of the left ventricle was significantly less in the EDTA group than in the control group: end-diastolic dimension 38.8 ± 3.3 mm vs. 43.9 ± 3.7 mm (n = 10, p = 0.0089). Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the EDTA group (45.3 ± 10.3 vs. 34.4 ± 11.8, n = 10, respectively, p = 0.031). In a swine model, intracoronary administration of an EDTA chelating agent reduced infarct size, mitochondrial damage, and post-infarct remodeling. This result warrants further clinical study evaluating the efficacy of the EDTA chelating agent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35136090 PMCID: PMC8825805 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05479-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effect of EDTA on acute reperfusion injury. (A) Baseline and post-reperfusion echocardiography in the EDTA and control groups. Arrows indicate myocardial edema after reperfusion in the EDTA group. (B) Area at risk (AAR) was delineated in the area without a blue tinge (yellow line). Infarct size (IFS) was measured in the area with a whitish color within the AAR (arrows). (C–E) IFS was smaller in the EDTA group than in the control group. Salvage percentage was higher in the EDTA group. (F) Myocardial tissues sections were stained with WGA(red), heavy chain cardiac myosin(green), DAPI(blue) and observed by confocal microscopy. Compared to the compact cardiomyocytes in the non-ischemic zone, interstitial space in the area at risk zone was increased due to myocardial edema and destroyed cardiomyocytes in the infarct core zone were observed. (G) Myocardial tissues using electron microscopy. Compared to the compact and dense mitochondria in the non-ischemic zone, mitochondria were swollen and edematous in areas at risk or burst and left as empty spaces in the infarct core zone. (H–J) Percentage of mitochondria in three different morphologies (normal/edema/burst) in the AAR zone. and infarct core zone. (K) Myocardial tissues were stained using MitoSOX to demonstrate the ROS status during reperfusion. The intensity of MitoSOX staining was more preserved in the EDTA group than in the control group. (L) Compared to calcium and magnesium concentrations between the two groups. The level of calcium was significantly lower in the EDTA group; otherwise, the level of magnesium was not significantly different.
Figure 2Effect of EDTA on LV remodeling. (A) representative echocardiographic view of the infarcted heart on day 28. Arrows, infarcted segments (B) The difference between left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by volumetry at baseline and on day 28. (C) Representative heart slices for the pathologic evaluation of post-infarct remodeling. Arrows indicate infarcted segments and thickness of segments. (D) Percentage of infarcted area in the slices. (E) Representative images of Masson’s trichrome staining of the infarcted segment in each group. Rectangles in the upper panel coincide with the lower panel.
Echocardiographic parameters of the EDTA and control groups.
| EDTA (n = 10) | Control (n = 10) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | LVEDD (mm) | 34 ± 3.1 | 33.0 ± 2.9 | 0.6532 |
| LVESD (mm) | 22.6 ± 3.2 | 22.9 ± 2.2 | 0.9023 | |
| LVEDV (mL) | 40.0 ± 11.2 | 36.8 ± 9.0 | 0.683 | |
| LVESV (mL) | 16.2 ± 7.3 | 15.0 ± 5.7 | 0.8061 | |
| LV EF (%) | 61.9 ± 10.7 | 59.2 ± 10.7 | 0.5675 | |
| Day 28 | LVEDD (mm) | 38.8 ± 3.3 | 43.9 ± 3.7 | 0.0089 |
| LVESD (mm) | 27.5 ± 4.0 | 35.2 ± 4.1 | 0.0028 | |
| LVEDV (mL) | 52.1 ± 11.4 | 70.2 ± 14.3 | 0.0101 | |
| LVESV (mL) | 28.3 ± 7.9 | 46.5 ± 14.3 | 0.0057 | |
| LV EF (%) | 45.3 ± 10.3 | 34.4 ± 11.8 | 0.031 | |
| Thinning (mm) | 44.2 ± 1.3 | 86.8 ± 10.5 | 0.003 | |
| Total length (mm) | 139.0 ± 5.4 | 141.2 ± 14.5 | 0.76 | |
| Thinning ratio (%) | 31.8 ± 0.6 | 61.5 ± 5.9 | 0.002 | |
LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVESD left ventricular end-systolic diameter, LVEDV LV end-diastolic volume, LVESV left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction by volumetric calculation.
Figure 3Schematic study flow.