Literature DB >> 35135752

Delivery of remote otology care: a UK pilot feasibility study.

Cillian T Forde1, Lilia Dimitrov1,2,3, Suneal Doal4, Jay Patel4, Dawn Clare4, Michael Burslem1, Nishchay Mehta1,2,3, Joseph G Manjaly5,2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has catalysed the need to implement the National Health Service Long-Term Plan to deliver more care in the community and to reduce face-to-face hospital appointments by up to 33%. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a remote otology service from triage through to delivery.
METHODS: New adult otology referrals at a tertiary ear, nose and throat (ENT) hospital aged between 18 and 70 with hearing loss or tinnitus were included. Patients attended an audiology-led community clinic where they underwent a focused history, audiometric testing, and a smartphone-based application and otoscope (Tympa System) was used to capture still and video images of their eardrums. The information was reviewed by ENT clinicians using a remote review platform with a subset of patients subsequently undergoing an in-person review to measure concordance between the two assessments.
RESULTS: 58 patients participated. 75% of patients had their pathways shortened by one hospital visit with 65% avoiding any hospital attendances. 24% required an additional face-to-face appointment due to incomplete views of the tympanic membrane or need for additional examinations. Electronic validation by a blinded consultant otologist demonstrated a diagnosis concordance of 95%, and concordance between remote-review and in-person consultations in the 12 patients who agreed to attend for an in-person review was 83.3%. 98% of patients were satisfied with the pathway.
CONCLUSION: This pilot service is feasible, safe and non-inferior to the traditional outpatient model in the included patient group. There is potential for the development of a community audiology-led service or use for general practioner advice and guidance. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; outpatients; quality improvement; telemedicine; waiting lists

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35135752      PMCID: PMC8830265          DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open Qual        ISSN: 2399-6641


  10 in total

1.  Tele-otology: planning, design, development and implementation.

Authors:  Robert H Eikelboom; Marcus D Atlas; Mathew N Mbao; Mark Gallop
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.184

2.  Preoperative planning for ear surgery using store-and-forward telemedicine.

Authors:  John Kokesh; A Stewart Ferguson; Chris Patricoski
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  The feasibility of a community-based mobile telehealth screening service for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in Australia.

Authors:  Galen Elliott; Anthony C Smith; Mark E Bensink; Cecil Brown; Christine Stewart; Chris Perry; Paul Scuffham
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Smartphone otoscopy by non-specialist health workers in rural Greenland: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Malene Nøhr Demant; Ramon Gordon Jensen; Mahmood F Bhutta; Gunnar Hellmund Laier; Jørgen Lous; Preben Homøe
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.675

5.  The impact of telehealth on wait time for ENT specialty care.

Authors:  Philip J Hofstetter; John Kokesh; A Stewart Ferguson; Linda J Hood
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.536

6.  Cholesteatoma: a disease of the poor (socially deprived)?

Authors:  Mamoona Khalid-Raja; Theofano Tikka; Chris Coulson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  A cross-sectional evaluation of the validity of a smartphone otoscopy device in screening for ear disease in Nepal.

Authors:  R Mandavia; T Lapa; M Smith; M F Bhutta
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Smartphone-enabled wireless otoscope-assisted online telemedicine during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Xiangming Meng; Zhiyong Dai; Chao Hang; Yangyang Wang
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Telemedicine in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review of Image Quality, Diagnostic Concordance, and Patient and Provider Satisfaction.

Authors:  Anne Y Ning; Claudia I Cabrera; Brian D'Anza
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Telescopic otology referrals: Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cottrell; Ajith George; Chris Coulson; Ruth Chambers
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-03
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A retrospective cohort study of telephone versus face-to-face clinics for the management of new otology referrals.

Authors:  Christopher Metcalfe; Peter Gaskell; Thomas McLelland; Sanjay Patel; Jameel Muzaffar; Lucy Dalton; Chris Coulson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.