Literature DB >> 35134969

Counting Advanced Precancerous Lesions as True Positives When Determining Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Specificity.

Uri Ladabaum1, Timothy R Church2, Ziding Feng3, David F Ransohoff4, Robert E Schoen5.   

Abstract

The landmark Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decision memo on blood-based biomarkers to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) sets thresholds of 74% or higher for sensitivity and 90% or higher for specificity for CRC. This approach does not consider detection of advanced precancerous lesions as true positives. We contrasted the impact of counting advanced precancerous lesions as true vs false positives and projected CRC outcomes under contrasting tests in a validated model. A test with the threshold performance set by CMS decreased CRC incidence by 30% and CRC mortality by 48% in individuals aged 45 years. If this test also detected advanced precancerous lesions with 30% sensitivity, CRC incidence decreased by 45% and mortality by 58%, but the CRC specificity of the test of only 88% would not satisfy the CMS threshold. CMS should reconsider its definition of threshold specificity for CRC screening biomarkers. Future coverage determinations on biomarkers to screen for cancer should consider detection of relevant precursor lesions and projected outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35134969      PMCID: PMC9275773          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   11.816


  5 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Reinier G S Meester; Samir Gupta; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.

Authors:  Ravi N Sharaf; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Theodore R Levin; Philip Lavin; Graham P Lidgard; David A Ahlquist; Barry M Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henriette C Jodal; Lise M Helsingen; Joseph C Anderson; Lyubov Lytvyn; Per Olav Vandvik; Louise Emilsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.