Literature DB >> 35134948

The 'beating-heart butterfly technique' for repair of basal post-infarction ventricle septum defect.

Maks Mihalj1, Miralem Pasic1,2, Thierry Carrel1,3.   

Abstract

Ischaemic ventricular septal defect is a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction with poor outcome. We present the 'beating-heart butterfly' technique to close the ventricular septal defect with a double-layered pericardial patch sewn to the intact septum under beating-heart cardiopulmonary bypass in 4 highest-risk patients. This technique combined with a liberal postoperative mechanical circulatory support and open-chest treatment allowed excellent results with 12 months of survival in all patients.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beating heart; Butterfly technique; Infarction; Surgical repair; Ventricular septal defect

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35134948      PMCID: PMC9070524          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


INTRODUCTION

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a serious condition associated with poor outcome [1]. While surgical repair using hypothermic cardioplegic cardiac arrest remains treatment of choice, the ideal timing remains uncertain due to fragilized tissue immediately post-infarction [2, 3]. Postponement of the procedure using circulatory support (veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump) may be associated with better outcomes [4]. We present 4 patients with post-infarction basal VSD who received a novel ‘beating-heart butterfly technique’ to close the defect under normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

CASE PRESENTATION AND OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

Surgical repair of a large basal post-infarction VSD was performed under normothermic bypass in 4 male patients (mean age 68 years): all received intra-aortic balloon pump and 1 veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The reconstruction of the septum is performed using a double-layered bovine xenopericardial patch in a modified ‘butterfly’ technique. The left ventricle is opened parallel to the posterior descending branch (Fig. 1A). The folded pericardial patch is first sutured close to the annular level using U-stitches of Prolene 2.0 (SH needle) with the pledgets on the right side of the septum (Fig. 1B). Attention is paid to the atrioventricular valve and the subvalvular structures which are pulled aside by the assisting surgeon. The sutures are placed as deep as possible in the intact myocardium, whilst necrotic tissue is parsimoniously resected. After anchoring the patch at the basal level, continuous suturing is used to close both ventricles. Each layer of the pericardial patch is used to close the corresponding ventricle (Fig. 1C). The double-layered pericardial patch opens up ‘as a butterfly’, with one side used for the reconstruction of the left ventricle and the other for the right ventricle (Fig. 1D). The heart is repositioned in the pericardial cavity (Fig. 1E) and careful de-airing is performed through the aortic root cannula. The main steps are summarized in the intraoperative pictures (Fig. 2). In 3 patients, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed prior to VSD-repair and 1 patient received percutaneous coronary intervention prior to surgery. One patient received a bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement.
Figure 1:

(A) The basal ventricular septum defect is approached through the left ventricle (incision parallel to the posterior descending artery). (B) A folded xenopericardial patch is attached on the left side of the septum with interrupted sutures that are reinforced with Teflon pledgets placed on the right side. (C) Each layer of the patch is used to reconstruct and close the corresponding ventricle. (D) Schematic representation of the double-layered ‘butterfly patch’. (E) Repositioning of the heart in the pericardial cavity after closing both ventricles.

Figure 2:

Intraoperative pictures of basal ventricular septal defect repair using a modified ‘beating-heart butterfly technique’ as a step-by-step approach (A–F). (A) Prior coronary revascularization with bypass grafting. (B) Opening the left ventricle parallel to the posterior descending artery through the infarcted tissue to access the basal ventricular septal defect. (C) Deep Teflon-armed U-stitches into the residual healthy septum. (D) These stitches are passed through a folded xenopericardial patch. (E) Continuous suturing to close each ventricle using one side of the patch. The patch opens up as a ‘butterfly’. (F) Final view after closure of both ventricles.

(A) The basal ventricular septum defect is approached through the left ventricle (incision parallel to the posterior descending artery). (B) A folded xenopericardial patch is attached on the left side of the septum with interrupted sutures that are reinforced with Teflon pledgets placed on the right side. (C) Each layer of the patch is used to reconstruct and close the corresponding ventricle. (D) Schematic representation of the double-layered ‘butterfly patch’. (E) Repositioning of the heart in the pericardial cavity after closing both ventricles. Intraoperative pictures of basal ventricular septal defect repair using a modified ‘beating-heart butterfly technique’ as a step-by-step approach (A–F). (A) Prior coronary revascularization with bypass grafting. (B) Opening the left ventricle parallel to the posterior descending artery through the infarcted tissue to access the basal ventricular septal defect. (C) Deep Teflon-armed U-stitches into the residual healthy septum. (D) These stitches are passed through a folded xenopericardial patch. (E) Continuous suturing to close each ventricle using one side of the patch. The patch opens up as a ‘butterfly’. (F) Final view after closure of both ventricles. All patients were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass with low catecholamine support while the preoperative mechanical support was continued. The chest was left open but the skin closed in all patients (mean duration of 3.5 days). Intra-aortic balloon pump-support could be removed between 2 and 5 days after surgery (median 3.5 days). Postoperative intensive care unit-stay was 3, 7, 8 and 21 days (median 9.7 days), and median hospital stay was 23 days. All patients were discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Postoperative echocardiography showed a small residual VSD in 1 patient, which was closed with an Amplatzer occluder device (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) 9 months after surgery. All patients were alive at 12 months of follow-up. Left ventricular function recovered in 3 patients and no patient had a residual shunt at 1 year of follow-up.

COMMENT

The ‘beating-heart butterfly technique’, avoiding additional ischaemia, is a promising technique to repair basal post-infarction VSD. All additional procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral, tricuspid valve repair/replacement) can be performed on beating heart as well. Optimized postoperative management including liberal use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and open-chest treatment was associated with 1 year of survival in all patients.
  4 in total

1.  Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Defect - Findings From a Japanese National Database.

Authors:  Genichi Sakaguchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Noboru Motomura; Chikara Ueki; Eriko Fukuchi; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Shinichi Takamoto; Akira Marui
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  Post infarction ventricular septal defect - can we do better?

Authors:  M A Deja; J Szostek; K Widenka; B Szafron; T J Spyt; M S Hickey; A W Sosnowski
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Two-patch technique for postinfarction inferoposterior ventricular septal defect.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imagawa; Shinnji Takano; Takahiro Shiozaki; Masahiro Ryugou; Fumiaki Shikata; Kanji Kawachi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Veno-Arterial ECMO in the Setting of Post-Infarct Ventricular Septal Defect: A Bridge to Surgical Repair.

Authors:  Aden McLaughlin; David McGiffin; James Winearls; Peter Tesar; Christopher Cole; Michael Vallely; Andrew Clarke; John Fraser
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.975

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.