| Literature DB >> 35134705 |
Tracy Ssali1, Lucas Narciso2, Justin Hicks2, Linshan Liu2, Sarah Jesso3, Lauryn Richardson3, Matthias Günther4, Simon Konstandin5, Klaus Eickel6, Frank Prato2, Udunna C Anazodo2, Elizabeth Finger7, Keith St Lawrence2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains a challenge due to the overlap of symptoms among FTD subtypes and with other psychiatric disorders. Perfusion imaging by arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a promising non-invasive alternative to established PET techniques; however, its sensitivity to imaging parameters can hinder its ability to detect perfusion abnormalities.Entities:
Keywords: Arterial spin labeling (ASL); Cerebral blood flow (CBF); Frontotemporal dementia (FTD); PET/MRI; Radiolabeled water PET ((15)O-water); sensitivity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35134705 PMCID: PMC8829802 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Summary of demographics and scores from standardized psychometric assessments.
| Demographics | Patients | Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (M:F) | 3:6 | 8:5 | ||
| Age (years) | 68.9 ± 8.2 | 64.1 ± 9.9 | ||
| Diagnosis | 2 bvFTD | – | ||
| Cognitive Measures | ||||
| N | Score | N | Score | |
| 9 | 60 ± 16.6 | 13 | 92.2 ± 3.7 | |
| Attention (18) | 9 | 15 ± 2.2 | 13 | 16.7 ± 2 |
| Memory (26) | 9 | 12.6 ± 7.6 | 13 | 23.5 ± 2.8 |
| Fluency (14) | 9 | 4.3 ± 3.2 | 13 | 11.8 ± 2.2 |
| Language (26) | 9 | 15.8 ± 7.8 | 13 | 25.4 ± 1.1 |
| Visuospatial (16) | 9 | 12.3 ± 2.2 | 13 | 14.8 ± 1.1 |
| 9 | 15 ± 6.9 | 13 | 27.7 ± 2.5 | |
| 9 | 5.9 ± 5.9 | 10 | 13.7 ± 1.6 | |
| 9 | 5.1 ± 2.7 | 10 | 1.9 ± 3.7 | |
| Cognitive Measures | ||||
| 8 | 14.3 ± 14.7 | – | – | |
| 9 | 24.3 ± 12.9 | – | – | |
| 8 | 8.5 ± 5.4 | – | – | |
| 9 | 49.6 ± 19.7 | – | – | |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Values in parenthesis represent the maximum score for each test.
T-tests were conducted to test for differences in cognitive measures between patients and controls.
Statistical significance (p < 0.05) is indicated by §
Fig. 1Perfusion maps generated by FL_TE-pCASL, SD-pCASL, and 15O-water from one patient participant (svFTD 2, top) and the average of all control participants (bottom). Perfusion maps are presented in radiological orientation.
Fig. 2Regional hypoperfusion detected by FL_TE-pCASL, SD-pCASL, and 15O-water for one patient from each of the FTD subtypes/PSP. Images are in radiological orientation.
Summary of overlap analysis (expressed as a percent) and Jaccard similarity index of hypoperfusion detected by FL_TE-pCASL and SD-pCASL 15O-water PET. Comparison was conducted using absolute and relative CBF.
| FL_TE-pCASL | SD-pCASL | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overlap | Adjacent | Isolated | Jaccard | Overlap | Adjacent | Isolated | Jaccard | |
| bvFTD1 | ||||||||
| bvFTD2 | ||||||||
| nfPPA1 | ||||||||
| nfPPA2 | ||||||||
| PSP1 | ||||||||
| PSP2 | ||||||||
| svFTD1 | ||||||||
| svFTD2 | ||||||||
| svFTD3 | ||||||||
| FL_TE-pCASL | SD-pCASL | |||||||
| Overlap | Adjacent | Isolated | Jaccard | Overlap | Adjacent | Isolated | Jaccard | |
| bvFTD1 | ||||||||
| bvFTD2 | ||||||||
| nfPPA1 | ||||||||
| nfPPA2 | ||||||||
| PSP1 | ||||||||
| PSP2 | ||||||||
| svFTD1 | ||||||||
| svFTD2 | ||||||||
| svFTD3 | ||||||||
Fig. 3Perfusion measured by FL_TE-pCASL, SD-pCASL, and 15O-water in 12 FTD-specific ROIs and 1 reference ROI. Boxplots are grouped as patients (green) and controls (orange), and the colored points represent the diagnosis. Significance levels are denoted by: * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.001), *** (p < 0.0001).
Fig. 4Comparison of ROI-averaged perfusion estimates from 15O-water and SD-pCASL (blue) and 15O-water and FL_TE-pCASL (red). Symbol shapes listed in the legend indicate FTD subtype. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Linear regression intercept, slope and correlation coefficient for perfusion comparisons between (1) FL_TE-pCASL and 15O-water and (2) SD-pCASL and 15O-water in FTD-related ROIs and the occipital gyrus as a reference region.
| FL_TE-pCASL | SD-pCASL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Intercept | Slope | R | Intercept | Slope | R |
| Amygdala | 28 | 0.43 | 0.66 | 13 | 0.53 | 0.84 |
| Anterior Cingulate | 23 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 18 | 0.54 | 0.91 |
| Inferior Frontal Gyrus | 12 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 15 | 0.86 | 0.88 |
| Insula | 20 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 18 | 0.55 | 0.86 |
| Midbrain | −0.47 | 0.81 | 0.88 | −5.4 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
| Middle Temporal Gyrus | 16 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 16 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
| Orbitofrontal Gyrus | 8.3 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 10 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| Precuneus | −1.3 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 2.2 | 1 | 0.93 |
| Superior Frontal Gyrus | 21 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 14 | 0.72 | 0.90 |
| Superior Temporal Gyrus | 7.3 | 1.1 | 0.90 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0.93 |
| Supplementary Motor Area | 14 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 13 | 0.71 | 0.55 |
| Temporal Pole | 30 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 12 | 0.88 | 0.89 |
| Occipital Gyrus | −4.6 | 1.2 | 0.82 | −3.5 | 1.3 | 0.85 |
Fig. 5Bland-Altman plots show agreement between perfusion measured by SD-pCASL and 15O-water in ROIs common to FTD. Solid black line represents the average difference, and dashed black lines represent the 95% confidence interval.