| Literature DB >> 35134562 |
Bourahima Kone1, Anou M Somboro2, Mahamadou Kone3, Jane L Holl4, Bocar Baya3, Djeneba Dabitao3, Dramane Diallo3, Bassirou Diarra3, Amadou Kone3, Yeya Dit Sadio Sarro3, Moumine Sanogo3, Antieme Cg Togo3, Robert L Murphy5, Souleymane Diallo3, Nadie Coulibaly3, Fatoumata Camara3, Seydou Samake3, Mahamadou Diakite3, Seydou Doumbia3, Mamoudou Maiga6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tuberculosis (TB) remains an important global health issue worldwide. Despite this scourge threatening many human lives, especially in developing countries, thus far, no advanced molecular epidemiology study using recent and more accurate tools has been conducted in Mali. Therefore, this study aimed to use variable-number tandem repeats of mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units (MIRU-VNTR) technology coupled with the spoligotyping method to accurately determine the hot spots and establish the epidemiological transmission links of TB in Bamako, Mali.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; MIRU-VNTR; Mali; Spoligotyping; TB
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35134562 PMCID: PMC9055845 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Infect Dis ISSN: 1201-9712 Impact factor: 12.074
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics (n = 245) | All participants n (%) | Modern lineages[ | Ancestral lineages[ | Animal strains[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 18–30 | 128 (52.2) | 106 (54.9) | 21 (44.7) | 1 (20.0) | 0.394 |
| 31–45 | 83 (33.9) | 62 (32.1) | 17 (36.2) | 4 (80.0) | 0.751 | |
| 46–60 | 25 (10.2) | 17 (8.8) | 8 (17.0) | 0 (0) | 0.555 | |
| > 60 | 9 (3.7) | 8 (4.2) | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0) | 0.923 | |
| Sex | Male | 171 (69.8) | 139 (72.0) | 28 (59.6) | 4 (80.0) | 0.193 |
| Female | 74 (30.2) | 54 (28.0) | 19 (40.4) | 1 (20.0) | 0.319 | |
| HIV status | Positive | 16 (6.5) | 11 (5.7) | 4 (8.5) | 1 (20.0) | 0.850 |
| Negative | 196 (80.0) | 157 (81.4) | 36 (76.6) | 3 (60.0) | 0.513 | |
| Not done | 33 (13.5) | 25 (12.9) | 7 (14.9) | 1 (20.0) | 0.892 | |
| Sputum microscopy | Grade 1 (Few AFB) | 30 (12.2) | 18 (9.3) | 11 (23.4) | 1 (20.0) | 0.305 |
| Grade 2 (Moderate AFB) | 35 (14.3) | 22 (11.4) | 10 (21.3) | 3 (60.0) | 0.455 | |
| Grade 3 (Many AFB) | 180 (73.5) | 153 (79.3) | 26 (55.3) | 1 (20.0) | 0.008 | |
| Patient TB status | Newly Diagnosed | 211 (86.1) | 165 (85.5) | 41 (87.2) | 5 (100.0) | 0.780 |
| Retreatment | 34 (13.9) | 28 (14.5) | 6 (12.8) | 0 (0) | 0.915 | |
| Drug susceptibility profile | Pan Sensitive | 185 (75.5) | 143 (72.6) | 38 (80.8) | 4 (80) | 0.305 |
| Other resistance | 51 (20.8) | 43 (22.3) | 7 (14.9) | 1 (20) | 0.660 | |
| MDR | 9 (3.7) | 7 (3.6) | 2 (4.3) | 0 (0) | 0.965 |
Abbreviations: AFB, acid-fast bacillus; MDR, multidrug resistant; TB, tuberculosis.
Modern lineage: L2, L3, L4.
Ancestral lineage: L1, L5/L6.
Animal strains = M. bovis.
Distribution of TB strains and their classification into various TB lineages across the 6 referral health centers (RHCs) in Bamako, based on the MIRU-24 identification method.
| Strain (N = 184 | TB Lineage | Effective n (%) | RHC-I N = 21 n (%) | RHC-II N = 16 n (%) | RHC-III N = 22 n (%) | RHC-IV N = 6 n (%) | RHC-V N = 37 n (%) | RHC-VI N = 82 n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bovis | Animal strain | 3 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (33.3 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) |
| EAI | Lineage 1 | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (33.3) |
| Beijing | Lineage 2 | 7 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (57.1) |
| Delhi/CAS | Lineage 3 | 3 (1.6) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
| Cameroon | Lineage 4 | 83 (45.1) | 7 (8.4) | 4 (4.7) | 10 (12.0) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (14.5) | 50 (60.2) |
| Ghana | 27 (14.7) | 5 (18.5) | 5 (18.5) | 10 (37.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (7.4) | 5 (18.5) | |
| H37Rv | 8 (4.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | |
| Haarlem | 13 (7.1) | 2 (15.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (15.4) | 9 (69.2) | |
| LAM | 8 (4.3) | 1 (12.5) | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (25.0) | 3 (37.5) | 1 (12.5) | |
| S | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| TUR | 1 (0.5) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Uganda I | 5 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Uganda II | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| West African 2 | Lineage 6 | 22 (12.0) | 3 (13.6) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (45.5) | 7 (31.8) |
Abbreviations: CAS, Central Asian Strain; EAI, East African-Indian; LAM, Latin American Mediterranean; MIRU, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit; TB, tuberculosis; TUR, Turkish; RHC, Referral Health Center.
Figure 1.Structure of the urban district of Bamako with the distribution of lineages based on the combination of MIRU and spoligityping methods. (a) Describes the distribution of population density per tuberculosis and the localization of the health center; (b) describes the distribution of the most population by strain; and (c) describes the distribution of TB cases recruited by lineage. MIRU, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit.
TB isolates classification based on spoligotyping solely and in combination with 24-MIRU-VNTR
| Strain assignment using spoligotyping solely N = 184 | Strain assignments using 24 MIRU-VNTR loci and spoligotyping N = 184 |
|---|---|
| LAM-10 (n = 64) | Cameroon (n = 83) |
| T1 (n = 10) | |
| X3 (n = 1) | |
| Family 33 (n = 1) | |
| X5 (n = 1) | |
| X7 (n = 1) | |
| LAM-10 (n = 3) | |
| T1 (n = 18) | Ghana (n = 27) |
| Harlem 3 (n = 1) | |
| Family 33 (n = 1) | |
| T1 (n = 7) | |
| West African 2 (n = 22) | |
| T1 (n = 1) | |
| Family 33 (n = 1) | |
| T1 (n = 5) | Haarlem (n = 13) |
| Haarlem 3 (n = 2) | |
| Family 33 (n = 1) | |
| T1 (n = 3) | |
| Haarlem3 (n = 1) | |
| T1 (n = 6) | H37Rv (n = 8) |
| Family 33 (n = 1) | |
| X1 (n = 1) | |
| LAM-9 (n = 3) | LAM (n = 8) |
| LAM-7 (n = 3) | |
| LAM-3 (n = 1) | |
| T1 (n = 1) | |
| Beijing (n = 4) | Beijing (n = 7) |
| Beijing (n = 2) | |
| T1 (n = 4) | Uganda I (n = 5) |
| Haarlem 3 (n = 1) | |
| Bovis (n = 3) | |
| T1 (n = 2) | Delhi/CAS (n = 3) |
| T1 (n = 1) | |
| EAI5 (n = 2) | EAI (n = 2) |
| T1 (n = 1) | S (n = 1) |
| T1 (n = 1) | TUR (n = 1) |
| T1 (n = 1) | Uganda II (n = 1) |
Abbreviations: CAS, Central Asian Strain; EAI, East African-Indian; LAM, Latin American Mediterranean; MIRU, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit; TB, tuberculosis; TUR, Turkish; VNTR, variable-number tandem repeat.
Comparison of the distribution of the most represented lineage 4 vs to the nonlineages 4 (animal strain, lineage 1, lineage 2, lineage 3, lineage 6) across the 6 referral health centers in Bamako, Mali.
| Referral health centers (RHC) | Lineage 4 | Nonlineage 4a | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHC I | 16 (76.2) | 5 (23.8) | 0.037 |
| RHC II | 13 (81.3) | 3 (18.7) | 0.039 |
| RHC III | 21 (95.5) | 1 (4.54) | 0.002 |
| RHC IV | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0.478 |
| RHC V | 25 (67.6) | 12 (32.4) | 0.046 |
| RHC VI | 68 (82.9) | 14 (17.1) | 0.0001 |
Main clusters according to MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping within the «Cameroon» (CAM) and West African (2) clade.
| SITclusters | Cases in the cluster | MIRU02 (0154) | Mtub04 (0424) | ETRC (0577) | ETRD (0580) | MIRU40 (0802) | MIRU10 (0960) | MIRU16 (1644) | Mtub21 (1955) | MIRU20 (2059) | QUB11b (2163) | ETR A (2165) | Mtub29 (2347) | Mtub30 (2401) | ETR B (2461) | MIRU23 (2531) | MIRU24 (2687) | MIRU26 (2996) | MIRU27 (3007) | Mtub34 (3171) | ETR E (3192) | Mtub39 (3690) | QUB26 (4052) | QUB4156 (4156) | MIRU39 (4348) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61-Grp 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 61-Grp 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 61-Grp 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 61-Grp 4 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| 61-Grp 5 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 61-Grp 6 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 115-Grp 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 852-Grp 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
Abbreviations: Grp, group; MIRU, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit; SIT, Spoligo-International type; VNTR, variable-number tandem repeat.