Melissa A Pender1, Timothy Smith1, Ben J Brintz1, Prativa Pandey2, Sanjaya K Shrestha3, Sinn Anuras4, Samandra Demons5, Siriporn Sornsakrin5, Ladaporn Bodhidatta5, James A Platts-Mills6, Daniel T Leung1. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA. 2. CIWEC Hospital Director, CIWEC Hospital, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal. 3. Department of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, Walter Reed/Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences Research Unit Nepal (WARUN), Kathmandu 44600, Nepal. 4. Department of Medicine, MedPark Hospital, Bangkok 10110, Thailand. 5. Department of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok 10400, Thailand. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinicians and travellers often have limited tools to differentiate bacterial from non-bacterial causes of travellers' diarrhoea (TD). Development of a clinical prediction rule assessing the aetiology of TD may help identify episodes of bacterial diarrhoea and limit inappropriate antibiotic use. We aimed to identify predictors of bacterial diarrhoea among clinical, demographic and weather variables, as well as to develop and cross-validate a parsimonious predictive model. METHODS: We collected de-identified clinical data from 457 international travellers with acute diarrhoea presenting to two healthcare centres in Nepal and Thailand. We used conventional microbiologic and multiplex molecular methods to identify diarrheal aetiology from stool samples. We used random forest and logistic regression to determine predictors of bacterial diarrhoea. RESULTS: We identified 195 cases of bacterial aetiology, 63 viral, 125 mixed pathogens, 6 protozoal/parasite and 68 cases without a detected pathogen. Random forest regression indicated that the strongest predictors of bacterial over viral or non-detected aetiologies were average location-specific environmental temperature and red blood cell on stool microscopy. In 5-fold cross-validation, the parsimonious model with the highest discriminative performance had an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.73 using 3 variables with calibration intercept -0.01 (standard deviation, SD 0.31) and slope 0.95 (SD 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: We identified environmental temperature, a location-specific parameter, as an important predictor of bacterial TD, among traditional patient-specific parameters predictive of aetiology. Future work includes further validation and the development of a clinical decision-support tool to inform appropriate use of antibiotics in TD.
BACKGROUND: Clinicians and travellers often have limited tools to differentiate bacterial from non-bacterial causes of travellers' diarrhoea (TD). Development of a clinical prediction rule assessing the aetiology of TD may help identify episodes of bacterial diarrhoea and limit inappropriate antibiotic use. We aimed to identify predictors of bacterial diarrhoea among clinical, demographic and weather variables, as well as to develop and cross-validate a parsimonious predictive model. METHODS: We collected de-identified clinical data from 457 international travellers with acute diarrhoea presenting to two healthcare centres in Nepal and Thailand. We used conventional microbiologic and multiplex molecular methods to identify diarrheal aetiology from stool samples. We used random forest and logistic regression to determine predictors of bacterial diarrhoea. RESULTS: We identified 195 cases of bacterial aetiology, 63 viral, 125 mixed pathogens, 6 protozoal/parasite and 68 cases without a detected pathogen. Random forest regression indicated that the strongest predictors of bacterial over viral or non-detected aetiologies were average location-specific environmental temperature and red blood cell on stool microscopy. In 5-fold cross-validation, the parsimonious model with the highest discriminative performance had an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.73 using 3 variables with calibration intercept -0.01 (standard deviation, SD 0.31) and slope 0.95 (SD 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: We identified environmental temperature, a location-specific parameter, as an important predictor of bacterial TD, among traditional patient-specific parameters predictive of aetiology. Future work includes further validation and the development of a clinical decision-support tool to inform appropriate use of antibiotics in TD.
Authors: Eileen J Klein; Daniel R Boster; Jennifer R Stapp; Joy G Wells; Xuan Qin; Carla R Clausen; David L Swerdlow; Christopher R Braden; Phillip I Tarr Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Donna M Denno; Jennifer R Stapp; Daniel R Boster; Xuan Qin; Carla R Clausen; Kathryn H Del Beccaro; David L Swerdlow; Christopher R Braden; Phillip I Tarr Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Andi L Shane; Rajal K Mody; John A Crump; Phillip I Tarr; Theodore S Steiner; Karen Kotloff; Joanne M Langley; Christine Wanke; Cirle Alcantara Warren; Allen C Cheng; Joseph Cantey; Larry K Pickering Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Ben J Brintz; Joel I Howard; Benjamin Haaland; James A Platts-Mills; Tom Greene; Adam C Levine; Eric J Nelson; Andrew T Pavia; Karen L Kotloff; Daniel T Leung Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-10-09
Authors: Louis Tapper; Sophie Skarbek; Robert A Lever; Peter L Chiodini; Margaret Armstrong; Robin L Bailey Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.090