Adrian Roesner1, Isabella Zerritsch2, Axel Schäfer3. 1. Institut für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Studiengang Physiotherapie, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland. adrian.roesner@uni-luebeck.de. 2. Institut für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Studiengang Physiotherapie, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland. 3. Studiengänge Ergotherapie, Logopädie und Physiotherapie, Fakultät Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit, Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst (HAWK) Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Deutschland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the review is to map the content of intervention education in people with acute nonspecific lumbar low back pain (LBP) to make it available in a synopsis. BACKGROUND: In the care of people with acute non-specific LBP, education is recommended as an elementary treatment component. However, the proposed content is proving to be heterogenic and the question arises as to how education should be designed in the future. METHOD: A systematic literature search and content analysis of studies with content on pain education was conducted as part of a scoping review. Inclusion criteria were: provision of relevant information on the content of pain education, patients with acute nonspecific low back pain, 18 years or older, publication in English or German. The search was conducted in the Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases and supplemented by a hand search. The search was completed in February 2021. RESULTS: A total of 4239 hits were identified, of which 90 studies were included. A wide range of content was found and clustered into ten categories. The most frequent statements were in the categories "recommendations for dealing with LRS," "education, reassuring aspects, and relieving basic messages," and "information and recommendations about medications." CONCLUSION: The teaching of pathoanatomical information can potentially trigger or increase anxiety and worry, whereas information on neurophysiological mechanisms of pain development and processing is more likely to have an anxiety-reducing effect. The results can contribute to the design of the intervention in different settings.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the review is to map the content of intervention education in people with acute nonspecific lumbar low back pain (LBP) to make it available in a synopsis. BACKGROUND: In the care of people with acute non-specific LBP, education is recommended as an elementary treatment component. However, the proposed content is proving to be heterogenic and the question arises as to how education should be designed in the future. METHOD: A systematic literature search and content analysis of studies with content on pain education was conducted as part of a scoping review. Inclusion criteria were: provision of relevant information on the content of pain education, patients with acute nonspecific low back pain, 18 years or older, publication in English or German. The search was conducted in the Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases and supplemented by a hand search. The search was completed in February 2021. RESULTS: A total of 4239 hits were identified, of which 90 studies were included. A wide range of content was found and clustered into ten categories. The most frequent statements were in the categories "recommendations for dealing with LRS," "education, reassuring aspects, and relieving basic messages," and "information and recommendations about medications." CONCLUSION: The teaching of pathoanatomical information can potentially trigger or increase anxiety and worry, whereas information on neurophysiological mechanisms of pain development and processing is more likely to have an anxiety-reducing effect. The results can contribute to the design of the intervention in different settings.
Authors: Simon D French; Mandy Nielsen; Leanne Hall; Philippa J A Nicolson; Maurits van Tulder; Kim L Bennell; Rana S Hinman; Chris G Maher; Gwendolen Jull; Paul W Hodges Journal: Pain Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: W Brinjikji; P H Luetmer; B Comstock; B W Bresnahan; L E Chen; R A Deyo; S Halabi; J A Turner; A L Avins; K James; J T Wald; D F Kallmes; J G Jarvik Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Anthony Delitto; Steven Z George; Linda Van Dillen; Julie M Whitman; Gwendolyn Sowa; Paul Shekelle; Thomas R Denninger; Joseph J Godges Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Pernille Frederiksen; Aage Indahl; Lars L Andersen; Kim Burton; Rasmus Hertzum-Larsen; Tom Bendix Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240