Literature DB >> 35132833

High Prevalence of blaCTX-M in Fecal Commensal Escherichia coli from Healthy Children.

Katherine Alcedo1, Joaquim Ruiz2, Theresa J Ochoa1,3,4, Maribel Riveros1,3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli can colonize the intestinal tract of healthy children, causing concern when antibiotic resistance is related to the presence of transferable mechanisms, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fecal samples from 41 healthy children from two villages of rural Peru were cultured on ceftriaxone-disks. ESBL production was confirmed with double disk synergy. In all ESBL-produced isolates, antibiotic susceptibility to 12 antibacterial agents was established by disk diffusion, while clonal relationships were determined by repetitive extragenic palindromic-polymerase chain reaction (REP-PCR). Presence of ST131 was determined using PCR.
RESULTS: Ceftriaxone-resistant microorganisms were recovered from 39 samples belonging to 22 out of 41 children (53.7%). Of these, 80 ceftriaxone-resistant and two ceftriaxone-intermediate E. coli from inside ceftriaxone-halos were confirmed as ESBL-producers. All isolates were multidrug-resistant. In 79/80 (98.8%) ceftriaxone-resistant isolates, the presence of blaCTX-M was detected alone (58 isolates, or together with other β-lactamase (blaTEM, 17 isolates; blaOXA-1-like, 3 isolates; blaTEM + blaOXA-1-like, 1 isolate), while in one isolate no such ESBL was identified. The two ceftriaxone-intermediate isolates recovered from the same sample, carried a blaTEM and blaSHV respectively. Thirty-four different clones were identified, with 4 clones being recovered from different samples from the same child. Twelve clones were disseminated among different children, including 5 clones disseminated between both villages. Two clones, accounting for 3 isolates and both recovered from the same children, belonged to E. coli ST131.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates high prevalence of ESBL-carriers among healthy children living in a rural area of Peru, stressing the need for continuous surveillance and search for public health control measures.
Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, Korean Society for Antimicrobial Therapy, and The Korean Society for AIDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic-resistance; Commensal; Escherichia coli; Extended-spectrum β-lactamases; Healthy carriers

Year:  2021        PMID: 35132833      PMCID: PMC8987167          DOI: 10.3947/ic.2021.0102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1598-8112


Introduction

The increasing levels of antibacterial resistance are one of the most relevant human health challenges of the present century. This phenomenon affects pathogenic microorganisms leading to human and/or animal infections, and also is extended to commensal inhabitants of human/animal microbiotas and environmental microorganisms [12345]. This finding has been related to a series of factors such as the widespread use of antibacterial agents which are often misused and abused, as well as to the fragile sanitary conditions present in different geographical areas [678]. The gastrointestinal microbiota plays a crucial role as reservoir of antibiotic-resistant genes. Escherichia coli is a relevant member of this microbiota, often exhibiting resistance to antibiotics, mostly related to the induction of chromosomal mutations leading to antibiotic resistance or the acquisition of transferable antibiotic-resistant genetic determinants [491011], this later may be transferred to pathogenic bacteria in the course of infections or transient asymptomatic colonization [1213]. Among transferable antibiotic-resistant determinants, the current widespread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) is involved in the acquisition of resistance to 3th and 4th generation cephalosporins, such as ceftazidime and cefepime. These enzymes are often encoded in genetic structures carrying other antibiotic-resistant determinants producing multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extended-resistant phenotypes (XDR) [1415]. Currently, a great variety of ESBL encoding genes have been described, but only a few ESBL families account for the majority of the descriptions, with bla CTX-M being the most prevalent in recent years and bla CTX-M-15 being the most disseminated worldwide [161718]. In Peru, a high frequency of ESBL-carrying pathogens have been reported in patients admitted to hospitals [23] but data about the ESBL prevalence among healthy people is scarce, underreported and mostly outdated [1920]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the presence of ESBL-carriers among healthy children from a rural area of Peru.

Materials and Methods

1. Samples

Fecal samples from 41 healthy children 10 - 20 months of age were collected in Calzada (19 children) and Yantalo (22 children), 2 rural districts from Moyobamba (Jungle area of Peru), between April and June 2015. The sampling was performed every 15 days.

2. Ethic statement

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (HSC-SPH-14-0261) and Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH) (63407). Written informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each child.

3. Microorganisms

The feces were directly cultured in McConkey agar No 3 (Oxoid, Thermo Scientific, Basingstone, United Kingdom) in the presence of a ceftriaxone disk (CRO, 30 µg), in accordance with Bartoloni et al [21]. A maximum of 3 colonies presumptive for E. coli were collected from inside ceftriaxone halos. Thereafter, selected microorganisms were preliminary identified by biochemical tools [22], and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the uidA gene [23]. For PCR controls, the E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the positive, an Enterobacter spp. from the internal UPCH collection was used as the negative, and distilled water was used as the blank control.

4. Antibiotic susceptibility

In all selected microorganisms, the antibiotic susceptibility to CRO was confirmed by disk diffusion test. In those isolates confirmed as CRO-intermediate/resistant, the susceptibility to ampicillin (AMP, 10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC, 30 µg), aztreonam (ATM, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), cefepime (FEP, 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 µg), cefoxitin (FOX, 30 µg), meropenem (MEM, 10 µg), chloramphenicol (CHL, 30 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX, 25 µg), nalidixic acid (NAL, 30 µg) and ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg) was also assessed following the same methodology and in accordance with Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [24].

5. Phenotypic detection of production of ESBL

In all isolates, when resistance to ceftriaxone was confirmed, the presence of ESBL was determined by the double disk methodology. A subset of 21 ESBL-positive isolates was confirmed by measuring the differences in the halos of CAZ and CAZ/CAZ-AMC, CTX and CTX/CTX-CLA pairs [25].

6. Detection of β-lactamases

The presence of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM and blaOXA-1-like was determined by PCR using primers and conditions previously described [26]. The E. coli JP27 (bla) and Klebsiella pneumoniae Sb108 (blaOXA-1, blaTEM and blaSHV) from internal UPCH bacterial collection were used as positive controls, while E. coli ATCC25922 was used as negative control.

7. REP-PCR (Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic - PCR)

Clonal relationships of ESBL-producing E. coli were determined by REP-PCR using the primer (5'-GCG CCG ICA TGC GGC ATT- 3') and conditions described by Riveros et al [27]. The PCR products were resolved in 1.5% agarose gel and stained with 2% ethidium bromide. The band patterns were analyzed through the GelJv2.0 software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/gelj/) [28]. Clonal relationships were established using the DICE coefficient, while clustering was based on the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) with a 1.2% tolerance in band position differences. The isolates were considered to belong to the same epidemiological group when the profiles showed ≥80% of identity [15]. The clones were arbitrarily named using Roman numbers.

8. Detection of ST131 clone

The presence of E. coli ST131 was sought in one isolate representative for each one of the different ESBL genotypes belonging to each REP-PCR pattern. Thus, a PCR using the primers (5'-AGCAACGATATTTGCCCATT-3' and 5'-AGCAACGATATTTGCCCATT -3'), and following the methodology previously described by Matsumura et al, was performed [29]. The ST131 uropathogenic E. coli U255, isolated in a previous study was used as positive control [30], while E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as negative control.

Results

A total of 167 samples of feces were collected, of these 17 were discharged because lack of grown. The presence of microorganisms presumptive for E. coli being detected inside CRO halos in 26.0% cases (39/150) belonging to 53.66% (22/41) children. Overall, 112 bacteria isolates were collected. Of these, 82.1% (92/112) were confirmed to be E. coli by both phenotypic and molecular methods. These E. coli were recovered from 38 of the selected samples, Meanwhile 16% (18/112) were identified as K. pneumoniae, and 1 non-fermenter bacteria remained unidentified. The remaining microorganism was unable to grown after pick-up. The 86.9% (80/92) of the E. coli were confirmed as CRO-resistant and 2.2% (2/92) were CRO-intermediate. The remaining 10.9% (10/92) E. coli, despite being isolated from inside CRO disk halos, were susceptible to CRO. These CRO-resistant/intermediate isolates were detected in 92.3% (36/39) of the selected samples. Thus, in 17 samples were recovered, 51 CRO-resistant E. coli isolates (3 E. coli/sample), while 22 CRO-resistant E. coli were recovered from 11 samples (2 E. coli/sample) and for each of the remaining seven samples were recovered one CRO-resistant E. coli. Furthermore, two CRO-intermediate isolates were recovered from the same sample. At least one CRO-resistant/intermediate isolate was recovered from the feces of 95.4% (21/22) children included in the study. Phenotypically, all CRO-resistant and intermediate isolates were ESBL-producers. When the ESBLs were determined by molecular tools, all CRO-resistant isolates carried a blaCTX-M alone (59 isolates) or together other β-lactamase (blaTEM, 17 isolates; blaOXA-1-like, 3 isolates; blaTEM + blaOXA-1-like, 1 isolate). Regarding the two intermediate isolates, one of them carried a blaTEM, and another carried a blaSHV. Regarding antibiotic resistance, the ESBL-producing isolates showed high levels of resistance to AMP (82 isolates, 100%), CTX (80 isolates, 97.6%), ATM (54 isolates, 65.9%), FEP (36 isolates, 43.9%), and CAZ (33 isolates, 40.2%). In addition, a high number of cephalosporin and AMC intermediate isolates was also observed. In addition to β-lactam related antibiotics, the isolates showed high levels of resistance to NAL (67 isolates, 81.7%), TMP/SMX (55 isolates, 67.1%) and CIP (41 isolates, 50%). The isolates only were susceptible to MEM (Table 1). Of note, all ESBL isolates showed MDR.
Table 1

Antibiotic resistance patterns in 82 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli from healthy children living in a rural area of Peru

ATBESBL-producing E. coli (N = 82)
RIS
N (%)N (%)N (%)
AMP82 (100.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
CRO80 (97.6)2 (2.4)0 (0.0)
CTX80 (97.6)2 (2.4)0 (0.0)
NAL67 (81.7)0 (0.0)15 (18.3)
TMP/SMX55 (67.1)2 (2.4)25 (30.5)
ATM54 (65.9)14 (17.1)14 (17.1)
CIP41 (50.0)3 (3.7)38 (46.3)
FEP36 (43.9)43 (52.4)3 (3.7)
CAZ33 (40.2)23 (28.0)26 (31.7)
CHL20 (24.4)0 (0.0)62 (75.6)
AMC4 (4.9)22 (26.8)56 (68.0)
FOX1 (1.2)5 (6.1)76 (92.7)
MEM0 (0.0)0 (0.0)82 (100.0)

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; ATB, antibiotic; R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible; AMP, ampicillin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; NAL, nalidixic acid; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; ATM, aztreonam; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FEP, cefepime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CHL, chloramphenicol; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; FOX, cefoxitin; MEM, meropenem.

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; ATB, antibiotic; R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible; AMP, ampicillin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; NAL, nalidixic acid; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; ATM, aztreonam; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FEP, cefepime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CHL, chloramphenicol; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; FOX, cefoxitin; MEM, meropenem. The clonal analysis of ESBL-producing E. coli showed a total of 34 different REP-PCR patterns. In 13 out of 21 children (61.9%) with ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, two or more different clones were observed, either in the same or in different samples. On the other side, four out of ten (40.0%) patients from which two or more samples were available, had the same E. coli clone recovered at different sampling times. While several clones were only recovered from the feces of one child, 12 clones were recovered from at feces of at least two children, with clones IX and III being recovered from the feces of five and four of the children respectively. Of note, while most of the clones seems to be specific for each village, five of them, the clones II, III, IX, XII and XVIII were recovered from feces of children of both villages (Tables 2, 3). Finally, the results showed the presence of isolates belonging to the same REP-PCR pattern with different β-lactamase patterns.
Table 2

Clonal relationships among ESBL-producing Escherichia coli from healthy children living in a rural area of Peru

ChildrenAreaaDatebColony 1cColony 2Colony 3
ESBLREPdESBLREPESBLREP
1CApril 10, 2015CTX-M + TEMVI
1CMay 22, 2015CTX-MXIXCTX-MIIICTX-MXX
2CApril 10, 2015CTX-MXXICTX-MXVIII
2CApril 24, 2015CTX-M+OXA-1XIVCTX-M+OXA-1XIVCTX-M+OXA-1XII
3YApril 17, 2015CTX-M + TEMXIICTX-MXIICTX-MXII
4CApril 17,2015CTX-MXIIICTX-MXIIICTX-MIX
4CJune 09, 2015CTX-MIICTX-MXXII
5YApril 24, 2015CTX-MXVIIICTX-MXVIIICTX-MXVIII
5YMay 08, 2015CTX-MXVIIICTX-MXVIIICTX-MXVIII
5YMay 22, 2015CTX-MXVCTX-MXVCTX-MXVII
5YJune 05, 2015CTX-MXVIICTX-MXVIICTX-MXVI
6YApril 24, 2015CTX-M+TEMXVICTX-M+TEMXVIICTX-M+TEMXVII
6YJune 05, 2015CTX-M+TEMXVIICTX-M+TEMVCTX-M+TEMV
7YApril 24, 2015CTX-M+TEMVCTX-M+TEMXXIII
7YMay 08, 2015CTX-M+TEMIVCTX-MIV
7YMay 22, 2015CTX-MIVCTX-MIVCTX-MIV
7YJune 05, 2015CTX-MIVCTX-MIII
8YApril 24, 2015CTX-M+TEMVIICTX-MIXCTX-MXXIV
8YMay 22, 2015CTX-M+TEM+OXA-1XXVCTX-M+TEMXXVICTX-MXXVII
8YJune 05, 2015CTX-MXXXIV
9YApril 24, 2015CTX-MIIICTX-MXVIIICTX-MVII
9YMay 08, 2015CTX-MVIICTX-MVII
10YMay 08, 2015CTX-MI
10YMay 22, 2015CTX-M+ TEMIXCTX-M+TEMIICTX-MVIII
11YMay 22, 2015CTX-M+TEMXXVIIICTX-MI
11YJune 05, 2015CTX-MXXIXCTX-MXXX
12YJune 05, 2015CTX-MIIICTX-M+TEMIII
13YJune 05, 2015CTX-MIXCTX-MXXXICTX-MIX
14YJune 09, 2015CTX-MXICTX-MXICTX-MVIII
15YJune 09, 2015CTX-MXXXIIICTX-MIX
16CJune 09, 2015CTX-MXCTX-MX
17CJune 13, 2015TEMVISHVVI
18YApril 24, 2015CTX-MXXXII
19YMay 08, 2015CTX-MND
20YMay 08, 2015CTX-MND
21CJune 09, 2015CTX-MND

aTown in which was collected the sample (C: Calzada; Y: Yantalo).

bDay in which the sample was taken.

cSamples with at least one colony displaying the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases.

dThe REP-PCR patterns were arbitrarily named following Roman numbers.

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamases; REP, repetitive extragenic palindromic; CTX-M, cefotaxime-hydrolyzing; OXA, oxacillin-hydrolyzing; SHV, sulfhydryl reagent variable; TEM, temoneira; ND, no determined; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Table 3

Distribution of ESBL-clones

REP-PCRChildren
123456789101112131415161718
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
XXVI
XXVII
XXVIII
XXIX
XXX
XXXI
XXXII
XXXIII
XXXIV

Highlighted in orange patients from Calzada, in blue patients from Yantalo.

ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamases; REP, repetitive extragenic palindromic; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

aTown in which was collected the sample (C: Calzada; Y: Yantalo). bDay in which the sample was taken. cSamples with at least one colony displaying the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases. dThe REP-PCR patterns were arbitrarily named following Roman numbers. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamases; REP, repetitive extragenic palindromic; CTX-M, cefotaxime-hydrolyzing; OXA, oxacillin-hydrolyzing; SHV, sulfhydryl reagent variable; TEM, temoneira; ND, no determined; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. Highlighted in orange patients from Calzada, in blue patients from Yantalo. ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamases; REP, repetitive extragenic palindromic; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. The presence of E. coli ST131 was established, with the isolates representative for the clones XIV and XXI showing a positive result, both recovered from the same children at different times.

Discussion

In hospital admitted patients, the asymptomatic carriage of ESBL-producing microorganisms has been related to increased number of acquired antibiotic-resistant infections, longer hospitalizations, and worse outcomes [313233]. Further, the presence of ESBL-carriers may become the hospital entry backdoor of ESBL microorganism, or ESBL-carrying genetic structure, which may be disseminate throughout the hospital on medical and personal devices, eventually colonizing different hospital wards [32]. These introduced ESBL-producing microorganisms may cause nosocomial infections or transfer the ESBL-carrying genetic structure to local nosocomial pathogens, which therefore will increase their antibiotic resistance armamentarium, exacerbating treatment difficulties. Most of these microorganisms belong to Enterobacteriales such as E. coli or K. pneumoniae, which are usual inhabitants of gut tract [16]. This scenario highlights the importance to establish community rates of gut colonization by ESBL-producing microorganisms. In this scenario we have analyzed the carriage of ESBL in healthy children living in a rural area of the Peruvian jungle. Two previous studies designed to evaluate the fecal carriage of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in children were conducted in the early 2000's in the same geographical area of Moyobamba, both using the same methodology followed in the present analysis [1819]. Thus, a 2002 sampling showed a very low prevalence (1 isolate, 0.1%) of ESBL in the area [119], and a posterior study of samples collected in 2005 showed an increase in the fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli, determined to be 1.5% [20]. In contrast, present results have shown extremely worrisome high prevalence of ESBL in this rural area of the Peruvian jungle. Despite the young age of the enrolled children (10 - 20 months of age), ESBL-producing E. coli were isolated from feces of >50% children included in the study. Most concerning was how all ESBL-producing isolates presented MDR, showing levels of non-susceptibility (resistance plus intermediate isolates) higher than 20% for all tested antibacterial agents excepting FOX and MEM. These findings, which highlights the exponential increase in the prevalence of ESBL in the area, are in agreement with the overall current high rates of antibiotic resistance, including cephalosporins, which has been described in recent studies performed in Peru focused on E. coli or other microorganisms [263435]. In this regard, in Peru it has been observed rates of 73.3% of ESBL among K. pneumoniae causing neonatal sepsis and of 52.3% among E. coli causing bacteremia in children <5 years of age [334]. Further, ESBL-producing E. coli dissemination though marketed food has also been shown. Thus, 59.4% of E. coli isolates recovered from marketed chicken meat was positive for ESBL in Peru [36]. From its first description in 1990 [37], blaCTX-M has become the most widely disseminated ESBL encoding genes, with blaCTX-M-15 being the most frequently described worldwide, superseding other genes such as blaTEM or blaSHV [161718]. In Peru, including the Moyobamba province, a high diversity of blaCTX-M has been reported with the presence of pathogenic, commensal, or environmental E. coli carrying blaCTX-M-2, blaCTX-M-3, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-24, or blaCTX-M-65 among others [202638]. While in the present study no specific blaCTX-M were determined, in agreement with above-mentioned wide dissemination, all CRO-resistant E. coli isolated in the present study carried blaCTX-M. Retrospective analysis has shown the presence of E. coli ST131 in Peru as early as 1968, and it has been associated with fluoroquinolone resistance and presence of CTX-M [3940]. Nevertheless, while the presence of E. coli ST131 is confirmed in the present series, only two clones accounting for three out of 82 isolates belong to this ST pattern. In addition, two other β-lactamases were detected (blaTEM and blaSHV respectively) from CRO-intermediate isolates, which might underly this phenotype. While in the present study the most relevant ESBL families were sought, the number of unrelated β-lactamase encoding genes either ESBL or not is enormous [16]. Thereby, the presence of few unidentified ESBL should not be ruled out. Meanwhile, the presence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible or intermediate to cephalosporins has been observed [31]. While 40% of the 22 children from which ESBL-producing E. coli were recove red at different times become stably colonized by specific ESBL-producing E. coli clones, as shown by the isolation of the same clone at different sampling times, a high number of different ESBL-producing E. coli clones have been identified, demonstrating a high heterogeneity of ESBL-producing E. coli populations. This finding, together with the continuous increase and current high prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli clones among healthy young children from the Moyobamba province, reflects a heavy external ESBL-selective pressure. This may be explained by several factors such as direct pressure exerted by an high use of cephalosporins in pediatric populations, although unlikely, or it could be related to the use of other antibiotics in pediatric populations, which might select specific genetic structures concomitantly carrying a mechanism of resistance for the antibiotic used but also a blaCTX-M gene or other ESBL encoding gene [1415]. Nonetheless, the most probable scenario is an acquisition of the ESBL in the family environment as previously suggested [20]. This possibility is supported by the fact that a few clones were recovered from the feces of different children, including children from both villages. It is possible these common clones were disseminated by adults traveling between both villages. The main limitation of the study is the sample size. Despite this fact, the obtained results clearly highlight the magnitude of the problem, with ESBL-producing E. coli being detected in the feces of >50% of healthy children. Further, in those isolates carrying an identified ESBL, more than one ESBL may be present either co-amplifying with used primers (e.g. 2 different blaCTX-M genes) or remaining hidden (i.e. presence of an ESBL unable to be amplified with used primers). In this sense it is worth mentioning the presence of different isolates co-carrying blaCTX-M with other β-lactamases such as blaTEM, blaOXA-1-like or both concomitantly. In summary, present results showed a worrisome prevalence of ESBL in feces of healthy children living in a rural area of Peru. These commensal E. coli, while non-pathogenic, are a severe health-risk because they may act as a hidden reservoirs of antibiotic resistant genes, such as ESBL. Further, if children need to be admitted to a health facility, these apparent innocent gut dwellers would contribute to the ESBL background of nosocomial pathogens by transferring the resistance determinants to hospital-resident microorganisms or cause nosocomial infections.
  35 in total

1.  [Comparison of four phenotypic methods to detect extended-spectrum betalactamases].

Authors:  Lizet Lezameta; Edgar Gonzáles-Escalante; Jesús H Tamariz
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Past and Present Perspectives on β-Lactamases.

Authors:  Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Transferable Mechanisms of Quinolone Resistance from 1998 Onward.

Authors:  Joaquim Ruiz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Resistance to quinolones, cephalosporins and macrolides in Escherichia coli causing bacteraemia in Peruvian children.

Authors:  Noemí Palma; Maria J Pons; Cláudia Gomes; Judit Mateu; Maribel Riveros; Wilfredo García; Jan Jacobs; Coralith García; Theresa J Ochoa; Joaquim Ruiz
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Cryptic lineages of the genus Escherichia.

Authors:  Seth T Walk; Elizabeth W Alm; David M Gordon; Jeffrey L Ram; Gary A Toranzos; James M Tiedje; Thomas S Whittam
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Temporal trends in antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated traits within the Escherichia coli sequence type 131 clonal group and its H30 and H30-Rx subclones, 1968 to 2012.

Authors:  Bente Olesen; Jakob Frimodt-Møller; Rikke Fleron Leihof; Carsten Struve; Brian Johnston; Dennis S Hansen; Flemming Scheutz; Karen A Krogfelt; Michael A Kuskowski; Connie Clabots; James R Johnson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Bacteremic Children.

Authors:  Maribel Riveros; Wilfredo García; Coralith García; David Durand; Erik Mercado; Joaquim Ruiz; Theresa J Ochoa
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Multidrug-resistant commensal Escherichia coli in children, Peru and Bolivia.

Authors:  Alessandro Bartoloni; Lucia Pallecchi; Marta Benedetti; Connie Fernandez; Yolanda Vallejos; Elisa Guzman; Ana Liz Villagran; Antonia Mantella; Chiara Lucchetti; Filippo Bartalesi; Marianne Strohmeyer; Angela Bechini; Herlan Gamboa; Hugo Rodríguez; Torkel Falkenberg; Göran Kronvall; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Franco Paradisi; Gian Maria Rossolini
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in commensal Escherichia coli among the children in rural hill communities of Northeast India.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar Singh; Saurav Das; Samer Singh; Varsha Rani Gajamer; Nilu Pradhan; Yangchen Doma Lepcha; Hare Krishna Tiwari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Escherichia coli β-Lactamases: What Really Matters.

Authors:  Priyanka Bajaj; Nambram S Singh; Jugsharan S Virdi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.