Literature DB >> 35132585

The paired A-Not A design within signal detection theory: Description, differentiation, power analysis and application.

Nina Düvel1, Reinhard Kopiez2.   

Abstract

Signal detection theory gives a framework for determining how well participants can discriminate between two types of stimuli. This article first examines similarities and differences of forced-choice and A-Not A designs (also known as the yes-no or one-interval). Then it focuses on the latter, in which participants have to classify stimuli, presented to them one at a time, as belonging to one of two possible response categories. The A-Not A task can be, on a first level, replicated or non-replicated, and the sub-design for each can be, on a second level, either a monadic, a mixed, or a paired design. These combinations are explained, and the present article then focuses on the both the non-replicated and replicated paired A-Not A task. Data structure, descriptive statistics, inference statistics, and effect sizes are explained in general and based on example data (Düvel et al., 2020). Documents for the data analysis are given in an extensive online supplement. Furthermore, the important question of statistical power and required sample size is addressed, and several means for the calculation are explained. The authors suggest a standardized procedure for planning, conducting, and evaluating a study employing an A-Not A design.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  A-Not A design; Auditory perception; Music; Signal detection theory; Statistical power; Yes-no task

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35132585      PMCID: PMC9579092          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01728-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  23 in total

1.  Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory.

Authors:  Neal E A Kroll; Andrew P Yonelinas; Ian G Dobbins; Christina M Frederick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Valentin Wyart; Anna Christina Nobre; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

4.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.

Authors:  Q McNEMAR
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1947-06       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The sampling distribution of d'.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

6.  The matched pairs design in the case of all-or-none responses.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Infants' perception of timbre: classification of complex tones by spectral structure.

Authors:  S E Trehub; M W Endman; L A Thorpe
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1990-04

8.  A Quantitative Relationship between Signal Detection in Attention and Approach/Avoidance Behavior.

Authors:  Vijay Viswanathan; John P Sheppard; Byoung W Kim; Christopher L Plantz; Hao Ying; Myung J Lee; Kalyan Raman; Frank J Mulhern; Martin P Block; Bobby Calder; Sang Lee; Dale T Mortensen; Anne J Blood; Hans C Breiter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Replacing the Orchestra? - The Discernibility of Sample Library and Live Orchestra Sounds.

Authors:  Reinhard Kopiez; Anna Wolf; Friedrich Platz; Jan Mons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect sizes for 2×2 contingency tables.

Authors:  Jake Olivier; Melanie L Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.