| Literature DB >> 35132297 |
Marcin Koniorczyk1, Dalia Bednarska1, Anna Masek2, Stefan Cichosz2.
Abstract
After the coronavirus outbreak, a tremendous amount of personal protective equipment has been produced and used by the health service and every human. Proper medical waste management becomes an important problem, which must be solved with a minimal environmental impact. The presented manuscript introduces the recycling process, during which personal protection masks are transformed into polypropylene fibers being an addition to a concrete mixture. The designed recycling procedure provides the entire disinfection of probably contaminated medical wastes, is straightforward, and potentially enables one to modify the properties of the final product. The applied dosage referred to 1 mask per 1 L of concrete. The final product of face masks processing was studied using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, surface free energy, contact angle measurements, and melt flow index. The analysis indicated that polypropylene is its main component. Two concrete mixtures were composed, i.e., with the addition of processed masks and the reference one. The following properties were determined to compare the modified concrete with the reference one: compressive and tensile strength, frost resistance, water transport properties, resistance to high temperature. The obtained results indicated that the addition of processed masks slightly increased the compressive strength (by about 5%) and decreased the tensile strength (by about 3%). Simultaneously, it was reported that the addition did not affect material properties related to concrete durability as frost resistance, water permeability, and fire performance. The results evinced, that the addition of processed facemasks into concrete did not deteriorate its properties. Therefore, it is a possible way of the protective masks processing and reusing with the high recycling capacity. Further study should be conducted to optimize the dosing and to modify the properties of PP strings to improve hardened concrete properties.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Maskcrete; Modified concrete; Pandemic wastes; Polypropylene fibers; Protection masks
Year: 2022 PMID: 35132297 PMCID: PMC8810376 DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Constr Build Mater ISSN: 0950-0618 Impact factor: 6.141
Fig. 1Scheme of the extrusion process.
Fig. 2Unprocessed mask and fibers obtained during the recycling process.
Fig. 3Fourier-transform infrared spectra for unprocessed/processed material.
Tabularized values of shifts between the selected peaks visible in FT-IR spectra of samples with the assignment to some chemical moieties.
| Sample | Wavenumber assigned to the certain peak [cm−1] | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2950 | 2917 | 2866 | 2838 | 1450 | 1375 | 1167 | 1102 | 997 | 972 | 841 | 806 | |
| Assignment | CH3 nonsymmetric stretching | CH2 nonsymmetric stretching | CH symmetric stretching | CH symmetric stretching | CH3 nonsymmetric changing angle vibrations | CH3 symmetry changing angle vibrations | CH3 rocking vibration | C–C stretching (isotactic) | CH3 rocking vibration | CH3 rocking vibration | C-CH3 stretching | C–C chain vibrations |
| Ref. | ||||||||||||
Fig. 4Thermal degradation detected for processed material. The red line refers to differential mass and the blue line to cumulative mass.
Fig. 5Exemplary contact angles for droplets of water, diiodomethane, and ethylene glycol for the processed material.
Properties of the processed material: total surface free energy (E) with its dispersive (Ed) and polar (Ep) components, average values of measured contact angles for distilled water, diiodomethane, and ethylene glycol, as well as mass (MFI) and volume (MVR) flow indexes.
| 30 ± 1 | 30 ± 1 | 0.01 ± 0.03 | 107 ± 1 | 62 ± 1 | 78 ± 1 | 26.5 ± 0.8 | 22.4 ± 0.7 |
Concrete composition.
| Mix ingredients | CR[kg/m3] | CF[kg/m3] |
|---|---|---|
| Cement CEM I 42.5R | 425 | 425 |
| Water | 157 | 157 |
| Coarse aggregate, 8–16 mm | 524 | 524 |
| Medium aggregate, 2–8 mm | 648 | 648 |
| Sand, 0–2 mm | 576 | 576 |
| Superplasticizer | 2,97 | 2,97 |
| Processed masks | – | 2 |
| w/c | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| Workability, slump test | 155 | 159 |
Chemical composition of OPC CEM I 42,5R.
| Chemical composition (%mass) | |
|---|---|
| Ignition loss | 2.8 |
| Insoluble residue | 0.46 |
| SO3 | 2.76 |
| chloride content (Cl−) | 0.066 |
| Na2O | 0.18 |
| MgO | 1.45 |
| CaO | 63.89 |
| SiO2 | 19.96 |
| Al2O3 | 5.21 |
| Fe2O3 | 2.68 |
| CaO free | 1.87 |
Compressive strength of investigated materials.
| CR | CF | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample No. | Crushing force[kN] | Compressive strength [MPa] | Crushing force[kN] | Compressive strength [MPa] |
| 1 | 651.28 | 65.13 | 687.53 | 68.75 |
| 2 | 672.48 | 67.25 | 702.35 | 70.24 |
| 3 | 651.06 | 65.11 | 727.43 | 72.74 |
| 4 | 661.53 | 66.15 | 695.48 | 69.55 |
| 5 | 700.58 | 70.06 | 713.68 | 71.37 |
| 6 | 697.88 | 69.79 | 722.59 | 72.26 |
| Mean value | 672.47 | 67.25 | 708.18 | 70.82 |
| Standard deviation | 22.19 | 2.22 | 15.69 | 1.57 |
Compressive strength of samples subjected to 100 freezing-thawing cycles and for reference material.
| CR | CF | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample No. | subjected to frost action | reference | subjected to frost action | reference |
| Compressive strength [MPa] | ||||
| 1 | 74.53 | 69.15 | 77.71 | 72.71 |
| 2 | 73.88 | 72.43 | 75.31 | 69.93 |
| 3 | 73.72 | 73.17 | 80.44 | 72.39 |
| 4 | 64.07 | 70.27 | 75.05 | 72.82 |
| 5 | 72.92 | 69.99 | 71.73 | 71.97 |
| 6 | 75.77 | 73.3 | 75.16 | 73.24 |
| Mean value | 72.48 | 71.39 | 75.90 | 72.18 |
| Standard deviation | 4.23 | 1.80 | 2.93 | 1.18 |
Tensile strength of investigated materials.
| CR | CF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sample No. | Tensile strength[MPa] | Tensile strength[MPa] |
| 1 | 7.66 | 8.19 |
| 2 | 7.64 | 7.6 |
| 3 | 8.19 | 7.37 |
| 4 | 8.79 | 7.51 |
| 5 | 8.07 | 8.32 |
| 6 | 8.07 | 7.8 |
| Mean value | 8.07 | 7.80 |
| Standard deviation | 0.42 | 0.38 |
Fig. 6Results of capillary rise test for CR and CF concrete.
The results of the water permeability test for CR and CF concrete.
| CR | CF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sample No. | Depth of waterfront penetration[mm] | Depth of waterfront penetration[mm] |
| 1 | 13 | 12 |
| 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 3 | 11 | 9 |
| 4 | 14 | 13 |
| Mean value | 12.00 | 12.25 |
Fig. 7Exemplary samples after the water permeability test.
The results of the spalling test for CR and CF concrete.
| Sample No. | initial mass,[g] | exfoliated material, [g] | exfoliatedmaterial, [%] | exfoliated materal - mean value, [%] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | 1 | 367.68 | 0.97 | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| 2 | 371.98 | 1.17 | 0.31 | ||
| 3 | 358.15 | 0.46 | 0.13 | ||
| 4 | 348.91 | 0.88 | 0.25 | ||
| CF | 1 | 356.65 | 0.59 | 0.17 | 0.21 |
| 2 | 372.98 | 0.99 | 0.27 | ||
| 3 | 385.14 | 1.13 | 0.29 | ||
| 4 | 353.78 | 0.46 | 0.13 |
Fig. 8Exemplary samples after water the spalling test.