Literature DB >> 35131805

Youth should decide: the principle of subsidiarity in paediatric transgender healthcare.

Florence Ashley1.   

Abstract

Drawing on the principle of subsidiarity, this article develops a framework for allocating medical decision-making authority in the absence of capacity to consent and argues that decisional authority in paediatric transgender healthcare should generally lie in the patient. Regardless of patients' capacity, there is usually nobody better positioned to make medical decisions that go to the heart of a patient's identity than the patients themselves. Under the principle of subsidiarity, decisional authority should only be held by a higher level decision-maker, such as parents or judges, if lower level decision-makers are incapable of satisfactorily addressing the issue even with support and the higher level decision-maker is better positioned to satisfactorily address the issue than all lower level decision-makers. Because gender uniquely pertains to personal identity and self-realisation, parents and judges are rarely better positioned to make complex medical decisions. Instead of taking away trans youth's authority over their healthcare decisions, we should focus on supporting their ability to take the best possible decision for themselves. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; gender identity; informed consent

Year:  2022        PMID: 35131805     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  How to deal with moral challenges around the decision-making competence in transgender adolescent care? Development of an ethics support tool.

Authors:  Bert Molewijk; Irma Hein; Janine de Snoo-Trimp; Annelou de Vries
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.834

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.