| Literature DB >> 35130948 |
Matthew J Cummings1,2, Barnabas Bakamutumaho3,4, Adam Price5, Nicholas Owor3, John Kayiwa3, Joyce Namulondo3, Timothy Byaruhanga3, Moses Muwanga6, Christopher Nsereko6, Stephen Sameroff5, Rafal Tokarz5, Wai Wong5, Shivang S Shah7, Michelle H Larsen8, W Ian Lipkin5,9,10, Julius J Lutwama3, Max R O'Donnell11,5,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The global burden of sepsis is concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, where severe infections disproportionately affect young, HIV-infected adults and high-burden pathogens are unique. In this context, poor understanding of sepsis immunopathology represents a crucial barrier to development of locally-effective treatment strategies. We sought to determine inter-individual immunologic heterogeneity among adults hospitalized with sepsis in a sub-Saharan African setting, and characterize associations between immune subtypes, infecting pathogens, and clinical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Biomarkers; High-throughput nucleotide sequencing; Sepsis; Tuberculosis; Uganda
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35130948 PMCID: PMC8822787 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03907-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Patient characteristics stratified by discovery and internal validation cohorts
| Patient characteristic | All patients (N = 288) | Discovery cohort (N = 201) | Internal validation cohort (N = 87) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex, n (%) | 171/288 (59.4) | 116/201 (57.7) | 55/87 (63.2) |
| Age, years, median [IQR] | 32 [ | 32 [ | 32 [ |
| Duration of illness prior to admission, days, median [IQR]a | 4 [ | 4 [ | 4 [ |
| History of fever, n (%) | 288/288 (100.0) | 201/201 (100.0) | 87/87 (100.0) |
| Night sweats | 225/288 (78.1) | 161/201 (80.1) | 64/87 (73.6) |
| Headache | 227/288 (78.8) | 158/201 (78.6) | 69/87 (79.3) |
| Cough | 178/288 (61.8) | 125/201 (62.2) | 53/87 (60.9) |
| Diarrhea | 100/288 (34.7) | 70/201 (34.8) | 30/87 (34.5) |
| Shortness of breath | 66/288 (22.9) | 47/201 (23.4) | 19/87 (21.8) |
| Dysuria | 39/288 (13.5) | 31/201 (15.4) | 8/87 (9.2) |
| Received antibiotic or antimalarial agent prior to admission, n (%) | 102/288 (35.4) | 70/201 (34.8) | 32/87 (36.8) |
| Temperature ≥ 38 °C, n (%) | 104/288 (36.1) | 76/201 (37.8) | 28/87 (32.2) |
| Temperature < 36 °C, n (%) | 84/288 (29.2) | 58/201 (28.9) | 26/87 (29.9) |
| Heart rate, beats/min, median [IQR] | 98 [87,109] | 98 [86,108] | 98 [90,111] |
| Respiratory rate, beats/min, median [IQR] | 22 [ | 22 [ | 22 [ |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg, median [IQR] | 103 [91,117] | 104 [91,118] | 100 [92,113] |
| Oxygen saturation, %, median [IQR] | 97 [95,98] | 97 [96,98] | 97 [95,98] |
| Encephalopathy, n (%)b | 57/288 (19.8) | 40/201 (19.9) | 17/87 (19.5) |
| qSOFA score ≥ 2, n (%)c | 129/288 (44.8) | 88/201 (43.8) | 41/87 (47.1) |
| qSOFA score ≥ 1, n (%)c | 253/288 (87.8) | 174/201 (86.6) | 79/87 (90.8) |
| Modified SIRS score ≥ 2, n (%)d | 247/288 (85.8) | 173/201 (86.1) | 74/87 (85.1) |
| MEWS, median [IQR] | 3 [ | 3 [ | 3 [ |
| UVA score, median [IQ R] | 3 [ | 3 [ | 2 [ |
| Shock, n (%)e | 41/288 (14.2) | 28/201 (13.9) | 13/87 (14.9) |
| Acute respiratory failure, n (%)f | 61/288 (21.2) | 39/201 (19.4) | 22/87 (25.3) |
| Severe anemia, n (%)g | 56/288 (19.4) | 39/201 (19.4) | 17/87 (19.5) |
| HIV-infected, n (%) | 154/286 (53.8) | 106/199 (53.2) | 48/87 (55.2) |
| WHO clinical stage 3 or 4, n (%) | 125/154 (81.2) | 91/106 (85.8) | 34/48 (71.0) |
| Newly diagnosed HIV-infection, n (%) | 20/154 (13.0) | 12/106 (11.3) | 8/48 (16.7) |
| On ART prior to admission, n (%)h | 91/134 (67.9) | 63/94 (67.0) | 28/40 (70.0) |
| On TMP-SMX prior to admission, n (%)h | 94/134 (70.1) | 65/94 (69.1) | 29/40 (72.5) |
| Malaria RDT positive, n (%) | 59/283 (20.8) | 38/197 (19.3) | 21/86 (24.4) |
| Microbiological TB positive, n (%)i | 51/288 (17.7) | 35/201 (17.4) | 16/87 (18.4) |
| Urine TB-LAM positive | 40/122 (32.8) | 27/83 (32.5) | 13/39 (33.3) |
| Influenza PCR positive, n (%) | 17/262 (6.5) | 14/184 (7.6) | 3/78 (3.8) |
| Death in-hospital or transfer, n (%) | 40/288 (13.9) | 28/201 (13.9) | 12/87 (13.8) |
| Duration of hospitalization, days, median [IQR]j | 5 [ | 5 [ | 5 [ |
| KPS ≤ 70 at alive discharge, n (%) | 20/246 (8.1) | 12/173 (6.9) | 8/73 (11.0) |
| Death at 30-days post-discharge, n (%) | 62/260 (23.8) | 44/179 (24.6) | 18/81 (22.2) |
IQR: interquartile range, qSOFA: quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment, SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome, MEWS: modified early warning score, UVA: universal vital assessment, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, WHO: World Health Organization, ART: anti-retroviral therapy, RDT: rapid diagnostic test, TB: tuberculosis, LAM: lipoarabinomannan, PCR: polymerase chain reaction
aUnknown for 1 patient
bAnything other than “Alert” on AVPU (alert, responsive to voice, responsive to pain, unresponsive) mental status assessment
cSystolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, and encephalopathy, latter defined using AVPU scale
dTemperature ≥ 38 °C or < 36 °C, heart rate ≥ 90 beats/min, respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths/min
eSystolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg despite administration of ≥ 1 L of intravenous fluid
fOxygen saturation ≤ 90% or respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/min
gHemoglobin < 9 g/dl or administration of blood transfusion
hDenominator is number with known HIV-infection prior to admission
iPositive result by sputum Xpert Ultra or smear or urine TB-LAM
jUnknown for 11 patients
Fig. 1Soluble mediator-derived immune subtypes in discovery cohort. a Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 14 serum mediators reflecting innate and adaptive immune activation, endothelial dysfunction, and fibrinolysis; dendrogram indicates cluster partition prior to k-means consolidation (N = 201). b Optimal cluster partitions suggested by cluster stability and validation indices as per NbClust package. c First two principal components plotted with the proportion of variance explained by each component; individuals stratified by cluster (subtype) assignment (N = 201). d Heatmap of z-score standardized soluble mediator concentrations, stratified by cluster (subtype) (N = 201). e Squared factor loadings for all serum mediators across the first two principal components in the discovery cohort; higher loading value indicates greater importance for each variable in explaining variance across each principal component (N = 201). f Importance of serum mediator variables in construction of gradient-boosted decision tree algorithm designed to predict cluster (subtype) assignment in discovery cohort (N = 201); 10 most important variables presented. Force-directed correlation networks based on the Fruchterman-Reingold method in discovery cohort subtype 1 g and subtype 2 h; each mediator variable was set as a network node with between-mediator correlations significant at p-value ≤ 0.05 indicated by weighted edges (blue and green edges indicate positive correlation, red edges indicate negative correlation, edge width indicates strength of correlation) (N = 201). Nodes with blue and green shading indicate those mediators considered central in the subtype 1 and 2 networks, respectively, defined as those with ≥ 1 centrality metric (strength, closeness, or betweenness) above the standardized cluster mean (z-score > 0)
Fig. 2Serum mediator concentrations over the reported course of illness in the discovery cohort, stratified by immune subtype. a–f Concentrations of soluble mediators over the reported course of illness, with robust regression lines and 95% confidence intervals, stratified by immune subtype (N = 198; 1 patient with unknown illness duration, 2 patients with extreme outliers in illness duration excluded). For example, an individual data point corresponding to “day 0” represents the serum mediator concentration for a patient who was admitted to hospital on the day of illness onset, while that corresponding to “day 5” represents a patient who was admitted to hospital on day 5 of illness
Fig. 3Illness severity scores, distributions of organ failures and pathogens, and outcomes stratified by immune subtypes. a–c Modified Early Warning Score, Universal Vital Assessment score, modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome [mSIRS], and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure assessment [qSOFA] scores stratified by immune subtype in the discovery cohort; p-values in 3C represent Chi-squared test with continuity correction (N = 201). d Chord plot indicating proportion of patients with specific organ failures across each subtype in the discovery cohort; a wider chord band indicates a greater proportion of patients with each corresponding organ failure (N = 201, proportions in subtype 2 vs. 1 as follows: shock: 17.7% vs. 10.5%; acute respiratory failure: 21.9% vs. 17.1%; severe anemia: 26.0% vs. 13.3%; encephalopathy: 25.0% vs. 15.2%). e Chord plot indicating proportion of patients with specific infections across each subtype in the discovery cohort; a wider chord band indicates a greater proportion of patients with each corresponding infection (N = 201, proportions in subtype 2 vs. 1 as follows: HIV: 65.6% vs. 42.0%, tuberculosis: 27.1% vs. 8.6%, malaria: 24.5% vs. 14.6%, influenza: 4.5% vs. 10.5%). f Proportions of patients with known HIV-infection status (N = 199), HIV-associated TB (N = 199), and positive urine TB-LAM results (among those tested, N = 83) across each immune subtype in the discovery cohort. g In-hospital outcome (N = 288), impaired functional status [Karnofsky Performance Status; KPS] among hospital survivors (N = 246), and 30-day vital status (N = 260) across each subtype in a pooled cohort of patients from the discovery and internal validation cohorts; p-values in 3F and 3G represent Chi-squared test with continuity correction. h Forest plot indicating univariable (unadjusted) odds ratios for in-hospital outcome and 30-day mortality among patients in subtype 2 vs. subtype 1, stratified by key pathogen groups in pooled discovery and internal validation cohort [patients with influenza omitted given small number of events in that pathogen group; for visualization, upper limit of 95% confidence interval for 30-day mortality truncated at 15 for patients with malaria (upper limit 27.57)
Fig. 4Biological pathway analysis and immune cell-type deconvolution of transcriptional subtypes. a–d Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of canonical signaling gene sets differentially enriched across transcriptional subtypes based on log-fold change ≥|1| and Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value ≤ 0.01; Z-score indicates up- versus down-regulation of signaling gene sets in subtype 2 vs. 1 (N = 128). e Relative quantities of immune cell-types inferred across subtypes based on ImmQuant digital cell quantification deconvolution; red shading indicates a higher inferred quantity of cell-type in subtype 2 vs. 1 based on log-fold change; blue shading indicates a lower inferred quantity of cell-type in subtype 2 vs. 1 based on log-fold change (N = 128). f Hematopoietic lineage plot with relative quantities of immune cell-types inferred across subtypes based on ImmQuant digital cell quantification deconvolution (N = 128); intensity of red shading indicates a higher inferred quantity of cell-type in subtype 2 vs. 1 based on log-fold change; intensity of blue shading indicates a lower inferred quantity of cell-type in subtype 2 vs. 1 based on log-fold change
Fig. 5Illness severity scores, distributions of organ failures and pathogens, and outcomes stratified by transcriptional subtypes. a–c Modified Early Warning Score, Universal Vital Assessment score, modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome [mSIRS], and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure assessment [qSOFA] scores stratified by transcriptional subtype; p-values in 5C represent Chi-squared test with continuity correction (N = 128). d Chord plot indicating proportion of patients with specific organ failures across each transcriptional subtype; a wider chord band indicates a greater proportion of patients with each corresponding organ failure (N = 128, proportions in subtype 2 vs. 1 as follows: shock: 21.4% vs. 11.0%; acute respiratory failure: 35.7% vs. 20.0%; severe anemia: 28.6% vs. 21.0%; encephalopathy: 25.0% vs. 12.0%). e Chord plot indicating proportion of patients with specific infections across each transcriptional subtype; a wider chord band indicates a greater proportion of patients with each corresponding infection (N = 128, proportions in subtype 2 vs. 1 as follows: HIV: 75.0% vs. 48.5%; tuberculosis: 35.7% vs. 10.0%; malaria: 11.5% vs. 24.5%; influenza: 0.0% vs. 2.4%). f Proportions of patients with HIV-infection (N = 127), HIV-associated TB (N = 127), and positive urine TB-LAM results (among those tested, N = 55) across each transcriptional subtype. g In-hospital outcome (N = 128), impaired functional status [Karnofsky Performance Status; KPS] (N = 108) among hospital survivors, and 30-day vital status across each transcriptional subtype (N = 117); p-values in 5F and 5G represent Chi-squared test with continuity correction. h Forest plot indicating univariable (unadjusted) odds ratios for in-hospital outcome and 30-day mortality among patients in transcriptional subtype 2 vs. subtype 1, stratified by key pathogen groups [patients with influenza omitted given small number of events in that pathogen group, odds ratio for in-hospital outcome omitted for patients with no pathogen detected as all events in transcriptional subtype 1; for visualization, upper limit of 95% confidence interval for in-hospital outcome truncated at 15 for patients with HIV-associated TB (upper limit 29.76) and malaria (upper limit 51.46), as well as for 30-day outcome for patients with no pathogen identified (upper limit 38.39) and malaria (upper limit 34.67)