Literature DB >> 35130141

Presence of optrA-mediated linezolid resistance in multiple lineages and plasmids of Enterococcus faecalis revealed by long read sequencing.

Martin P McHugh1,2, Benjamin J Parcell1,3,4, Kerry A Pettigrew1,5, Geoff Toner2, Elham Khatamzas2,6, Noha El Sakka3, Anne Marie Karcher3,4, Joanna Walker3, Robert Weir7, Danièle Meunier8, Katie L Hopkins8, Neil Woodford8, Kate E Templeton2, Stephen H Gillespie1, Matthew T G Holden1.   

Abstract

Transferable linezolid resistance due to optrA, poxtA, cfr and cfr-like genes is increasingly detected in enterococci associated with animals and humans globally. We aimed to characterize the genetic environment of optrA in linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis isolates from Scotland. Six linezolid-resistant E. faecalis isolated from urogenital samples were confirmed to carry the optrA gene by PCR. Short read (Illumina) sequencing showed the isolates were genetically distinct (>13900 core SNPs) and belonged to different MLST sequence types. Plasmid contents were examined using hybrid assembly of short and long read (Oxford Nanopore MinION) sequencing technologies. The optrA gene was located on distinct plasmids in each isolate, suggesting that transfer of a single plasmid did not contribute to optrA dissemination in this collection. pTM6294-2, BX5936-1 and pWE0438-1 were similar to optrA-positive plasmids from China and Japan, while the remaining three plasmids had limited similarity to other published examples. We identified the novel Tn6993 transposon in pWE0254-1 carrying linezolid (optrA), macrolide (ermB) and spectinomycin [ANT(9)-Ia] resistance genes. OptrA amino acid sequences differed by 0-20 residues. We report multiple variants of optrA on distinct plasmids in diverse strains of E. faecalis. It is important to identify the selection pressures driving the emergence and maintenance of resistance against linezolid to retain the clinical utility of this antibiotic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus faecalis; Tn6993; antimicrobial resistance; linezolid; optrA; plasmid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35130141      PMCID: PMC8941993          DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


Introduction

and are carried in the intestinal tract and are important opportunistic pathogens in humans [1]. Treatment of enterococcal infections is challenging due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to multiple antimicrobials including aminoglycosides, benzylpenicillin, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines and trimethoprim. Among the remaining treatment options, clinical isolates are usually resistant to amoxicillin, and resistance to vancomycin is increasingly common [2]. In contrast, typically remains susceptible to amoxicillin and resistance to vancomycin is uncommon. Where vancomycin cannot be used, treatment options against severe enterococcal infections are largely limited to daptomycin, linezolid or combination therapy and are further complicated by issues with efficacy, susceptibility or toxicity [1]. Oxazolidinones such as linezolid block protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit and inhibit formation of the initiation complex [3]. Linezolid resistance is reported in ≤1 % of bloodstream enterococcal isolates in the UK and is an important antimicrobial for the treatment of multi-drug-resistant Gram-positive infections, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci [4, 5]. The G2576T mutation in the chromosomal 23S rRNA genes can arise de novo during extended linezolid therapy [6], although antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control measures appear to be successful in limiting the generation and spread of mutational linezolid resistance in clinical practice [7]. The methyltransferases Cfr, Cfr(B) and Cfr(D), and the ABC-F ribosomal protection proteins OptrA and PoxtA also confer resistance to linezolid in enterococci but are carried on mobile genetic elements, which can spread across genetically distinct lineages in the absence of antimicrobial selection [8-14]. Recent international surveillance confirmed that linezolid resistance remains rare, but optrA has recently spread to every continent and is the dominant mechanism of linezolid resistance in [15]. Surveillance has also detected optrA in the UK [16]. Studies into the genetic context of optrA have identified the gene on both the chromosome and plasmids, often associated with insertion sequences such as IS1216, a possible vehicle for the rapid spread of optrA [17, 18]. We used whole genome sequencing to determine whether Scottish optrA-positive isolates represent transmission of a single clonal lineage. We hypothesized that spread of optrA is driven by a single mobile genetic element, and to investigate this we made hybrid assemblies of short and long read sequencing data to generate complete genomes and to reconstruct the genetic environment of optrA.

Methods

Bacterial strains

Study isolates were a convenience sample from three regional hospital laboratories during 2014–17; as such they may not reflect the entire Scottish population of optrA-positive E. faecalis. E. faecalis were identified from clinical samples using MALDI-TOF MS or the Vitek-2 GP-ID card (bioMérieux). Initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with the Vitek-2 AST-607 card; where linezolid resistance was detected the full MIC was determined by agar dilution methodology at the AMRHAI reference laboratory, and susceptibility testing was interpreted with EUCAST breakpoints [19]. Linezolid-resistant isolates were then screened for the genetic determinant of resistance at AMRHAI. Detection of the G2576T mutation ( numbering) in the 23S rRNA genes was investigated by PCR-RFLP or by a real-time PCR-based allelic discrimination assay [20, 21]. The cfr and optrA genes were sought by a multiplex PCR using primers for the detection of cfr (cfr-fw: 5′-TGAAGTATAAAGCAGGTTGGGAGTCA-3′ and cfr-rev: 5′-ACCATATAATTGACCACAAGCAGC-3′) [22] and optrA (optrA-F: 5′-GACCGGTGTCCTCTTTGTCA-3′ and optrA-R: 5′-TCAATGGAGTTACGATCGCCT-3′) (AMRHAI, unpublished). Access to isolates and clinical data was approved by the NHS Scotland Biorepository Network (Ref. TR000126).

Whole genome sequencing and genomic analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from pelleted overnight broth cultures using the MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Cambio), or QiaSymphony DSP DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). Short read barcoded libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina) and sequenced with a MiSeq instrument (Illumina) using 250 bp paired-end reads on a 500-cycle v2 kit. Short reads were quality trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.36 and the settings [LEADING:5 TRAILING:5 SLIDINGWINDOW:4 : 15 MINLEN:100] [23]. Barcoded long read libraries were generated with the 1D Ligation Sequencing Kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and sequenced with an R9.4 flow cell on a MinION sequencer (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Base-calling and barcode de-multiplexing was performed with Albacore v2.1.3 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and the resulting fast5 files were converted to fastq with Poretools v0.6.0 [24], or basecalled and de-multiplexed with Albacore v2.3.3 with direct fastq output. Porechop v0.2.3 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop) was used to remove chimeric reads and trim adapter sequences. Sequencing reads and annotated assemblies for this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive at EMBL-EBI under accession number PRJEB36950 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJEB36950). Short reads were mapped to the reference genome V583 (accession number AE016830) using SMALT v0.7.4 [25]. Mapped assemblies were aligned, and regions annotated as mobile genetic elements in the V583 genome (transposons, integrases, plasmids, phages, insertion sequences, resolvases and recombinases) were removed from the assembly (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/remove_blocks_from_aln). All sites in the alignment with SNPs were extracted using SNP-sites v2.4.0 [26] and pairwise SNP counts were calculated (https://github.com/simonrharris/pairwise_difference_count). MLST profiling was performed using SRST2 v0.2.0 [27] and the MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/efaecalis/) sited at the University of Oxford [28, 29]. Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms were detected using ARIBA v2.12.1 [30] and the ResFinder database v3.0 [31] with the addition of linezolid resistance mutations in the 23S rRNA (G2505A and G2576T based on numbering) and rplC, rplD, and rplV ribosomal protein genes. Hybrid assembly was performed with Illumina short reads and Nanopore long reads using Unicycler v0.4.7 [32] in standard mode. The resulting assemblies were annotated with Prokka v1.5.1 using a genus-specific RefSeq database [33]. Hybrid assemblies were checked for indel errors using Ideel (https://github.com/mw55309/ideel) and UniProtKB TrEMBL database v2019_1. Plasmid comparisons were generated and visualized with EasyFig v2.2.2 [34].

Results

Detection of optrA in distinct strains

There were 14133 isolates of during the study period from all sample types: 14 (0.1 %) were identified as linezolid-resistant, and eight (57.1%) were confirmed as optrA-positive at the AMRHAI reference laboratory. Six optrA-positive were available for further characterization (Table 1). The earliest isolates in this collection were from the Grampian region in the northeast of Scotland in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Three more isolates were identified in 2017 from the Lothian and Forth Valley regions in east and central Scotland (Table 1), with no clear epidemiological links between the patients. Only one patient had known exposure to linezolid prior to the isolation of an optrA-positive , two patients were hospitalized at the time of sample collection while the remaining four were from general practice. Samples were collected for symptomatic urinary tract infection or orchitis.
Table 1.

Details of the optrA-positive characterized in this study

Isolate

Year

Region

Clinical sample

Patient source

MLST

Acquired linezolid resistance genes

Mutations in 23S rRNA

Mutations in ribosomal proteins*

MIC (mg l–1)

cfr

cfr(B)

cfr(D)

optrA

poxtA

G2505A

G2576T

L3

L4

L22

CHL

LZD

WE0851

2014

Grampian

Urine

GP

480

+

T150A

F101L

≥64

8

WE0254

2015

Grampian

Urine

GP

19

+

T150A

F101L

≥64

8

WE0438

2016

Grampian

Urine

Hospital

330

+

T150A

F101L

≥64

8

TM6294

2017

Forth Valley

Urine

Hospital

585

+

T150A

F101L

≥64

8

BX5936

2017

Lothian

Semen

GP

894

+

T150A

F101L

≥64

8

BX8117

2017

Lothian

Urine

GP

16

+

+

T150A

F101L

≥64

8

GP, general practice.

*The mutations identified here have never been detected in the absence of other resistance mechanisms in linezolid-resistant isolates, and have been detected in linezolid-susceptible isolates. Their role in linezolid resistance is unclear [54].

Details of the optrA-positive characterized in this study Isolate Year Region Clinical sample Patient source MLST Acquired linezolid resistance genes Mutations in 23S rRNA Mutations in ribosomal proteins* MIC (mg l–1) cfr cfr(B) cfr(D) optrA poxtA G2505A G2576T L3 L4 L22 CHL LZD WE0851 2014 Grampian Urine GP 480 + T150A F101L ≥64 8 WE0254 2015 Grampian Urine GP 19 + T150A F101L ≥64 8 WE0438 2016 Grampian Urine Hospital 330 + T150A F101L ≥64 8 TM6294 2017 Forth Valley Urine Hospital 585 + T150A F101L ≥64 8 BX5936 2017 Lothian Semen GP 894 + T150A F101L ≥64 8 BX8117 2017 Lothian Urine GP 16 + + T150A F101L ≥64 8 GP, general practice. *The mutations identified here have never been detected in the absence of other resistance mechanisms in linezolid-resistant isolates, and have been detected in linezolid-susceptible isolates. Their role in linezolid resistance is unclear [54]. Whole genome sequencing was performed to investigate the genetic relationship between the isolates. In silico MLST showed the six isolates belonged to different STs, suggesting they were genetically distinct (Table 1). To further confirm this, we analysed SNPs in the core genomes of the optrA-positive isolates and found the isolates differed by a median 18806 SNPs (range 13 909–22 272). Previous estimates suggest a genetic diversification rate of 2.5–3.4 SNPs/year for , highlighting the optrA-positive isolates share a very distant common ancestor [35].

optrA is carried on diverse genetic platforms

Hybrid assembly produced complete or near-complete genomes with <3 % putative coding sequences shorter than the closest reference match. This indicated the hybrid assembly process removed most indel errors, with 1–5 % of coding sequences expected to represent true truncated pseudogenes [36]. The hybrid assemblies contained between one and three plasmids ranging in size from 11 to 80 kb, with optrA present on a single complete plasmid in each isolate (pBX5936-1, pBX8117-2, pTM6294-2, pWE0254-1, pWE0438, pWE0851-1; Table S1, available in the online version of this article). The optrA-positive plasmids shared limited sequence similarity to the first described optrA plasmid (pE394, accession KP399637), with only the 5–10 kb region surrounding optrA and fexA (a chloramphenicol/florfenicol exporter) showing >70 % nucleotide identity. In all six Scottish optrA-positive plasmids, optrA and fexA were located within 550–750 nt of each other intervened by a single coding sequence (hypothetical function in all but pBX8117-2 which was annotated as a putative NADH reductase). Within the Scottish optrA-positive plasmids, pBX5936-1 (69 kb) and pTM6294-2 (53 kb) were most similar, sharing 97 % average nucleotide identity over 40 kb of aligned sequence (Fig. 1). pTM6294-2 shared 99.8 % identity with a 53 kb optrA-positive pheromone responsive plasmid detected in from a clinical sample in China (pEF10748), clinical samples in Spain (IsoBar1, IsoBar2 and IsoBar3) and raw dog food in Portugal (pAPT110) [37, 38]. pWE0438 shared 92.3 % nucleotide identity over 52 kb with pS7316 from an isolated from a hospitalized patient in Japan [39]. In pWE0438, the optrA and fexA genes were ~3.8 kb upstream of Tn917 carrying ermB, and ~1.8 kb downstream of another Tn3-family transposase (Fig. 1). pBX8117-2 carried optrA and the novel cfr(D) gene (encoding a 23S rRNA methylase that confers phenicol, oxazolidinone, pleuromutilin and streprogramin A resistance) but apart from these genes showed no similarity to another E. faecium optrA/cfr(D)-positive plasmid identified in a clinical sample in Ireland (M17-0314) [40]. The other Scottish optrA-positive plasmids showed limited similarity to other published examples outside of the optrA/fexA region.
Fig. 1.

Alignment of full optrA-positive plasmid sequences. While some sequence similarity is seen between pTM6294-2 and pBX5936-1, in general identity is low between the optrA-positive plasmids, indicating optrA has mobilized to multiple plasmid backbones. Arrows indicate coding sequences, coloured blocks between each sequence indicate regions with blastn sequence identity ≥90 % and length >680 bp. Blue identity blocks indicate inverted sequence.

Alignment of full optrA-positive plasmid sequences. While some sequence similarity is seen between pTM6294-2 and pBX5936-1, in general identity is low between the optrA-positive plasmids, indicating optrA has mobilized to multiple plasmid backbones. Arrows indicate coding sequences, coloured blocks between each sequence indicate regions with blastn sequence identity ≥90 % and length >680 bp. Blue identity blocks indicate inverted sequence. IS1216 is often associated with optrA and other antimicrobial resistance genes in enterococci. pBX5936-1 and pBX8117-2 had IS1216 flanking the optrA and fexA region as a putative transposable cassette (Figs 1 and S1). However, IS1216 can mobilize from a single insertion sequence copy [41] and single copies were found close to optrA in pTM6294-2 and pWE0851-1 (Figs 1 and S1). blastn comparison of pWE0254-1 with the other optrA-positive plasmids highlighted a partial IS1216 transposase that was not identified by automated annotation. Immediately upstream of the partial IS1216 was an IS3-family transposase, the insertion of which probably disrupted IS1216. In pWE0254-1 optrA and fexA were found on a Tn6674-like element carrying macrolide (ermA) and spectinomycin (APH(9)-Ia) resistance genes. The element was 98.9 % identical to Tn6674 but had a 1.2 kb insertion containing IS3-family transposases (Fig. S1), and was classified as Tn6993 by the Transposon Registry (accession GCA_906464915) [42]. Tn6993 was not inserted into the chromosomal radC gene as described for most Tn6674-like elements [43, 44]. A similar element was present in a plasmid from in Chinese swine (TBCP-4814-p1, accession MH830363) but this element lacked the tnpA gene and the 1.2 kb insertion of Tn6993 (Fig. S1) [45]. pWE0438 had a single copy of IS1216 located ~35 kb from optrA, although Tn917 and Tn3-like transposases were detected closer to optrA as described above.

optrA sequences vary between isolates

Comparison of the optrA sequence from each isolate to the first identified optrA from pE394 revealed different variants at the nucleotide and amino acid levels: WE0254 and TM6294 had one synonymous nucleotide substitution, BX5936 had a single non-synonymous nucleotide substitution, WE0851 had two non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions, WE0348 had three non-synonymous and one synonymous substitution, and BX8117 had 20 non-synonymous and a further 17 synonymous substitutions (Table S1, Fig. S2). The degree of sequence variation between the six FexA proteins was less than that seen in OptrA. Comparison with the first reported FexA sequence (AJ549214) showed four common non-synonymous variants in all strains (amino acid changes A34S, L39S, I131V and V305I), with all but BX8117 having an additional D50A variant.

Discussion

This study found optrA present in diverse genetic lineages of and carried on largely unrelated plasmids in six isolates from Scotland. pTM6294-2, pBX5936-1 and pWE0438 shared homology with plasmids identified in China or Japan, highlighting the wide dispersal of optrA. However, the other Scottish plasmids had limited similarity to other published examples, suggesting a diverse reservoir of optrA-carrying genetic elements. We identified optrA often carried with a number of other resistance genes, including in a novel multiresistance transposon Tn6993 in pWE0254-1, and the recently described cfr(D) in pBX8117-2. Despite differences in optrA sequences and carriage of other linezolid determinants such as cfr(D), all isolates showed low-level linezolid resistance of 8 mg l−1 (Table 1). Freitas et al. [44] recently analysed all publicly available optrA-positive genome sequences and categorized the genetic environment of optrA. Group 1 includes Tn6674-like platforms, of which WE0254 is a representative (Fig. S1). However, in the original scheme all Group 1 elements were integrated into the chromosome, while in WE0254 the optrA element Tn6993 is inserted into a plasmid. Group 2 includes optrA-fexA-impB platforms, represented in the Scottish isolates by TM6294 and WE0438 (Fig. S1). Group 3 includes platforms containing the araC regulatory element and is not represented in the Scottish optrA-positive isolates characterized here. The three remaining Scottish isolates could not be grouped based on the Freitas scheme, highlighting the need for further studies and public access to complete genome sequences to determine the true diversity of optrA-positive platforms. Many studies of optrA to date are from China and tend to show a higher prevalence of optrA in isolates from animals rather than humans [11, 46, 47]. Additionally, florfenicol use in agriculture is linked to optrA detection in farm animals [48, 49]. However, increasing reports describe rapid increases in optrA detection from human samples in many countries [15, 50, 51]. optrA-positive isolates are often resistant to multiple antibiotic classes used in animal and human health, allowing significant opportunity for co-selection of optrA-positive strains both in animal and in human settings. More recently, optrA has been identified in clinical vancomycin-resistant isolates, with very limited treatment options [50, 52, 53]. Our study is limited in scale as we only include isolates from three regional clinical laboratories, and therefore larger studies are required to infer national patterns. However, our finding that optrA is present as different gene variants, carried on different mobile genetic elements, in unrelated strains of suggest a diverse optrA reservoir that is only partly investigated in this study. As well as optrA, the cfr and poxtA genes are emerging transferable linezolid resistance mechanisms. Further studies from a One Health perspective are warranted to understand the selection pressures driving transferable linezolid resistance, and the transmission dynamics of these strains to avoid further spread of oxazolidinone resistance within and other Gram-positive bacteria. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  48 in total

1.  Rapid emergence of highly variable and transferable oxazolidinone and phenicol resistance gene optrA in German Enterococcus spp. clinical isolates.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bender; Carola Fleige; Dominik Lange; Ingo Klare; Guido Werner
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Identification of a multiresistant mosaic plasmid carrying a new segment of IS1216E-flanked optrA with integrated Tn551-ermB element in linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis human isolate.

Authors:  Masaki Iimura; Wataru Hayashi; Eriko Arai; Tatsuya Natori; Kazuki Horiuchi; Go Matsumoto; Hayato Tanaka; Eiji Soga; Yukiko Nagano; Yoshichika Arakawa; Noriyuki Nagano
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Abundance and diversity of the faecal resistome in slaughter pigs and broilers in nine European countries.

Authors:  Patrick Munk; Berith Elkær Knudsen; Oksana Lukjancenko; Ana Sofia Ribeiro Duarte; Liese Van Gompel; Roosmarijn E C Luiken; Lidwien A M Smit; Heike Schmitt; Alejandro Dorado Garcia; Rasmus Borup Hansen; Thomas Nordahl Petersen; Alex Bossers; Etienne Ruppé; Ole Lund; Tine Hald; Sünje Johanna Pamp; Håkan Vigre; Dick Heederik; Jaap A Wagenaar; Dik Mevius; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 4.  The Enterococcus: a Model of Adaptability to Its Environment.

Authors:  Mónica García-Solache; Louis B Rice
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Characterization of poxtA, a novel phenicol-oxazolidinone-tetracycline resistance gene from an MRSA of clinical origin.

Authors:  Alberto Antonelli; Marco Maria D'Andrea; Andrea Brenciani; Cesira L Galeotti; Gianluca Morroni; Simona Pollini; Pietro Emanuele Varaldo; Gian Maria Rossolini
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Linezolid- and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Using Whole Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Lilian Abbo; Bhavarth S Shukla; Amber Giles; Laura Aragon; Adriana Jimenez; Jose F Camargo; Jacques Simkins; Kathleen Sposato; Truc T Tran; Lorena Diaz; Jinnethe Reyes; Rafael Rios; Lina P Carvajal; Javier Cardozo; Maribel Ruiz; Gemma Rosello; Armando Perez Cardona; Octavio Martinez; Giselle Guerra; Thiago Beduschi; Rodrigo Vianna; Cesar A Arias
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data.

Authors:  Nicholas J Loman; Aaron R Quinlan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs.

Authors:  Michael Inouye; Harriet Dashnow; Lesley-Ann Raven; Mark B Schultz; Bernard J Pope; Takehiro Tomita; Justin Zobel; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Novel multiresistance cfr plasmids in linezolid-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) from a hospital outbreak: co-location of cfr and optrA in VRE.

Authors:  Alexandros Lazaris; David C Coleman; Angela M Kearns; Bruno Pichon; Peter M Kinnevey; Megan R Earls; Breida Boyle; Brian O'Connell; Gráinne I Brennan; Anna C Shore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterococcus Isolates from Cattle and Pigs in Portugal: Linezolid Resistance Genes optrA and poxtA.

Authors:  Joana Gião; Célia Leão; Teresa Albuquerque; Lurdes Clemente; Ana Amaro
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.